Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T11CM03587
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2012 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 01/27/2012 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Item #2 , "provide fault current analysis" not addressed per last review. Please include one line diagram,complete with feeder and riser conductor sizes, grounding electrode system. Dan Santa Cruz Elect.Plan Review. |
| 01/27/2012 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. For additional fee assessment, please provide a written summary of all deferred submittal items to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Please submit on an 8 1/2" x 11" piece of paper with your letterhead, the deferred submittal summary provided on sheet A1 and address it to the building official, Mr. Ron Booth so he may assess additional review fees. 2. OK 3. OK 4. Please provide a Fire Exit Plan including locations of all fire rated partitions required. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Please show the number of occupants through each exit. SHEET A1 5. Please provide occupancy load calculations and total occupancy load. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Please recalculate as per Table 104.1.1 using Residence, Kitchen and Assembly (table and chairs). 6. Please show the accessible parking detail plan layout on the Site Plan. a. The one accessible parking space must be "Van Accessible as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1106.5 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Detectable warnings are not required for access to an accessible parking aisle. 7. OK 8. Please provide a large scale detail of the parking sign including "Van Accessible" sign. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Please reference me to the large scale parking sign. SHEET A2 9. Bath #9 is a public toilet and must meet accessible requirements of ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENT: Where are your drinking fountains? 10. OK ONLY ON SHEET A1 NOT A2 11. OK 12. Please show how the laundry room complies with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 1004.10. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: Section 1004.10 requires a horizontal approach to the washer and dryer units. 13. Please provide large scale details of both ramps showing compliance with ICC/ANSI, Section 405 including all dimensions, slopes, handrails, landings and grade elevations. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: Please insure that the existing ramp is code compliant as it is an emergency exit. 14. OK 15. OK 16. Provide large scale plans and interior elevations of all the different of toilet rooms showing all accessibility requirements. Include all dimensions, clearances and accessories. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: Provide large scale plans and interior elevations of all the different of toilet rooms showing all accessibility requirements. Include all dimensions, clearances and accessories. 17. OK 18. OK SHEET A5 19. OK 20. OK 21. OK 22. OK 23. Provide call outs on plans for lintels as called out in calculations, DH-1, DH-2, DH-3, and DH-4. RESUBMITTAL RESPONSE COMMENTS: Comment response is ok but where are the structural calculations? They are not included with this resubmittal. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHEET A4 24. All black plactic roof insulation membraine to be class "C" per table 803.5 of 2006 IBC. END OF RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| 01/27/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/27/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/03/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/08/2012 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GROUP HOME 2. LIVING QUATERS @ SFR RATE 64FU'S - COMMON AREAS @ COMMERCIAL RATE - 17FU'S 3. RECOUNTED ALL WASTEWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES - 32FU (SFR) CREDIT GIVEN PER PERMIT #2611 DATED 02/7/77 AND PROPERTY CARD PER WW/ES 4. NEED TO SHOW EXISTING LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER |
| 02/09/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. General Note 4 on sheet a6 is not from the IMC - see Section 504.6, IMC 2006. (A 5" dryer duct can only be used if the manufacturer of the dryer specifically allows that size to be used.) General Note 6 on sheet a6 is not part of the IMC - see Section 309, IMC 2006. [Original comment: The 2006 International Mechanical Code with Local Amendments is the relevant code for this project.] 2. Comment not resolved. The specified rooftop units will not function in hot weather when the air moving across the evaporator coil is above 95 degrees Fahrenheit due to the excessive amount of outside air being used. The submitted ventilation calculations do not appear to have been done per ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004. (See Chapter 4, IMC 2006 and the City of Tucson amendments for guidance with the ventilation requirements.) Clarify the air balancing for the AC units (e.g. AC-2, a 3-ton unit having a nominal supply of 1200 CFM, shows 1390 CFM of supply air but has 2080 CFM of return air). [Original comment: Show that the new rooftop equipment is being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements (e.g. outside air quantity for the rooftop units). Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; show the termination of the condensate drain. [Original comment: Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.] 4. Comment not resolved. The proposal to use a motion detector to control the exhaust fan will result in air supplied to the bathroom not being exhausted when there is no detectable motion. [Original comment: Provide information on the sequence of operation for the bathroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the bathrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006.] 5. Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using the corridors as return air ducts. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2006. |
| 02/10/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; the waste and vent plumbing floor plan, and the water pressure and pipe sizing calculations have not been submitted. [Original comment: Provide a complete plumbing plan, including a plumbing floor plan, water pressure and pipe sizing calculations, and plumbing specifications. (Included on sheet a8 as noted on the drawing index?). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; provide a letter from the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department stating that a grease interceptor is not required. [Original comment: Provide a letter from the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (520-443-6202) that indicates that a grease interceptor is not required for this activity. Reference: Sections 306.1 and 1014.1, UPC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; show how the water temperature is to be controlled. [Original comment: Provide information to show how the outlet temperature of the hot water is to be limited to 110 degrees at the lavatory. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.] 4. Comment not resolved; revise the water heater detail to coordinate with the plumbing plan (e.g. the detail shows a hot water recirculation system but the plumbing plans do not, and the pipe sizes are different). [Original comment: Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, recirculating pump (if equipped), and valves. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, and 608.3, UPC 2006.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Original comment: Calculate the water demand using the fixture units shown in Tables 6-5 or A-2. Reference: Section 610.3, UPC 2006.] 6. Comment not addressed. [Original comment: Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006. (See also Table 7-6, UPC 2006).] 7. Comment not resolved; the first floor elevation is required to determine the need for a backwater valve. [Original comment: Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 8. Comment not resolved; the returned (downward) vent is to connect to the top of the horizontal 2" drain with the horizontal section of the foot vent connected to the returned vent above the horizontal drain. [Original comment: Revise the design of the island venting for the kitchen sink per Section 909.0, UPC 2006. The connection of the downward vent shall be located downstream of the vertical fixture drain.] |
| 02/15/2012 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |