Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03563
Parcel: 12710017D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM03563
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/28/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Without fire sprinklers, all corridors must be 1 hour rated, including ceilings and 20 minute doors with closers.
Exit sign locations confusing. If required exit through room 111, seems like we need a exit sign outside that room.
11/28/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Without fire sprinklers, all corridors must be 1 hour rated, including ceilings and 20 minute doors with closers.
Exit sign locations confusing. If required exit through room 111, seems like we need a exit sign outside that room.
11/29/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Coordinate details 1/A4.0 and 2/A4.0. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Provide waste and vent isometrics; indicate the route of the existing building drains as they exit the building. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Provide the listing for the use of Wirsbo Aquapex PEX (PEXa) in recirculating hot domestic water systems. Reference: Section 301.1.1, UPC 2006.
5. Provide the structural design for the mounting shelf for the water heater referenced in detail 1/P2.0, along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006
6. Verify that the electrical grounding for the building complies with the requirements of Section 604.8, UPC 2006.
7. Provide CW shut off valves for each building entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006.
11/29/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/29/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied The R-value and SHGC data for the windows and entry door, shown on sheet A1.0, do not meet the requirements of the prescriptive portion of the 2006 IECC (Section 502). Revise the values or demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
12/08/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/12/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: EXIT 134 (LOCATED IN 'BEHAVIOR ROOM 111'), IS NOTED AS A REQUIRED EXIT. IBC SECTION 1014.2(3) PROHIBITS THIS EXIT. REVISE.
2. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: THE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY IS NOT ADEQUATE TO CONSIDER THE NORTH AND SOUTH PORTIONS AS SEPARATE BUILDINGS. THIS WILL REQUIRE A TWO HOUR FIRE WALL PER IBC SECTION 705, OR A TWO HOUR FIRE BARRIER PER IBC SECTION 706.
3. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: WHETHER THE INTERIOR SEPARATING WALL IS CONSIDERED A FIRE WALL OR A FIRE BARRIER, OPENINGS THROUGH THAT WALL ARE PROHIBITED PER IBC SECTIONS 705.8 AND 706.7.1. REFERENCE ALSO IBC SECTIONS 1020.1.2 AND 1021.5.
4. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR PLAN: WITHOUT THE SEPARATING WALL, AND NOT ALLOWING EXIT 134, THE EXITS 101 AND 123 DO NOT MEET THE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF IBC SECTION 1015.2.1 UNLESS THE BUILDING HAS AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM. THE SPRINKLERS WOULD RESOLVE THE PREVIOUS ISSUES.
5. SHEET A2.0; DETAILS 1 AND 2: THE WOOD BRACING IS NOTED TO BE 36" O.C. REVISE THE SPACING TO WORK WITH THE TRUSS JOIST SPACING.
6. SHEET A2.0; DETAILS 1 AND 2: PROVIDE A CONNECTION NOTE FOR THE BRACING TO THE TRUSS JOISTS AND TO THE TOP OF THE WALL.
7. SHEET A2.0; DETAIL: PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONDITION OF THE TRUSS JOISTS RUNNING PARALLEL TO THE WALL, AND HOW THE TOP OF THE WALL WILL BE BRACED. INDICATE ALL MEMBER SIZES AND CONNECTIONS.
8. SHEET A5.0; SECTION 1: THE DETAIL NOTED 5/S2.0 AT THE CENTER SECTION OF THE ROOF IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
9. SHEET A5.0; SECTION 2: THE DETAIL NOTED 4/S2.0 AT THE ENTRY IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
10. SHEET A5.0; SECTION 2: THE DETAIL NOTED 3/S1.0 AT THE WALL FOOTING IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
11. SHEET A6.1; ELEVATION 4: THE SINK HEIGHT IN THE BREAK ROOM IS REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE PER IBC SECTION 1109.3. REVISE.
12. SHEET A7.0; DOOR SCHEDULE: DOORS IN THIS SCHEDULE WILL CHANGE OR BE OMITTED DUE TO THE SEPARATING WALL REVISION.
13. SHEETS S1.0 AND S2.0: IS THIS A NEW BUILDING ENTIRELY, OR JUST FROM THE SLAB UP? NEW CALCULATIONS (OR CALCULATIONS THAT EXIST FROM A PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL) MUST BE INCLUDED FOR REVIEW (INCLUDING THE SOILS INVESTIGATION).
14. SHEET S1.0: A FOOTING SCHEDULE IS INDICATED ON THIS SHEET, BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT LOCATE THOSE FOOTINGS. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET S1.0; PLAN: A DETAIL IS INDICATED ON THE NORTH WALL (1/S1.1). REVISE (NO SHEET S1.1).
16. SHEET S1.0; DETAIL 1: ARE BOTH OF THE SLABS SHOWN EXISTING? IS THIS AN EXISTING DETAIL? CLARIFY.
17. SHEET S1.0; DETAILS 2 AND 3: ARE THE WALL ANCHOR BOLTS EXISTING? IF NOT, WILL EPOXY ANCHORS BE USED IN LIEU OF THE ANCHOR BOLTS? CLARIFY.
18. SHEET S1.0; DETAIL 4: ARE THE COLUMN ANCHOR BOLTS EXISTING? IF NOT, WILL EPOXY ANCHORS BE USED IN LIEU OF THE ANCHOR BOLTS? CLARIFY.
19. SHEET S2.0; PLAN: THE DETAIL NOTED 1/S2.0 AT THE WEST WALL IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
20. SHEET S2.0; PLAN: THE DETAIL NOTED 2/S2.0 AT THE NORTH WALL IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
21. SHEET S2.0; PLAN: ARE ALL OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE SW5 CONSTRUCTION? INDICATE THAT ON THE PLAN (A FEW WALLS ARE UNMARKED).
22. SHEET S2.0; DETAIL 5: THE DETAIL CUT ON THE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE DETAIL. REVISE.
23. SHEET P2.0; DETAIL 1: THE DETAIL INDICATES TO ANCHOR THE WATER HEATER PLATFORM IN "APPROVE MANNER-SEE STRUCTURAL". PROVIDE THAT ON A STRUCTURAL SHEET.
24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
12/16/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/03/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/03/2012 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed