Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T11CM03462
Parcel: 10408093B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG

Permit Number - T11CM03462
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/07/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/08/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET G1.02; BUILDING CODES: THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE IS LISTED AS THE 2009 EDITION. REVISE TO 2003.
2. SHEET G1.02; BUILDING CODE REVIEW: THE BUILDING CODE REVIEW INDICATES 832 SF, WHILE THE OCCUPANT LOAD SUMMARY INDICATES 771 SF. CLARIFY.
3. SHEET A2.01; FLOOR PLAN (A10): THE PLAN SHOULD INDICATE WALLS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH (WHERE A 21'-0" OPENING IS INDICATED). ON THE PLAN, IT APPEARS THERE IS NO WALL AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH. VERIFY.
4. SHEET A2.01; GENERAL RCP NOTES: NOTE A INDICATES INSTALLATION OF FIRE SPRINKLER LINES. REMOVE THAT NOTE.
5. SHEET A2.01; FLOOR PLAN (A10): PROVIDE THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION INDICATORS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS (J13 AND A13?).
6. SHEET A2.01; FLOOR PLAN (A10): REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN THE BOX OF THE ELEVATION INDICATORS AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS FOR THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS.
7. SHEET A4.01; SECTION J1: A NOTE ABOVE THE WALL INDICATES A 3/16" TUBE STEEL, WHILE A NOTE BELOW THE WALL INDICATES A 3-1/2 X 3-1/2 X 1/4 TUBE STEEL. VERIFY.
8. SHEET A4.01 (SECTION J1); SHEET A2.01 (FLOOR PLAN A10): SECTION J1 INDICATES THE TUBE STEEL AT 6'-0" MAXIMUM, WHILE THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A TUBE STEEL SUPPORT AT THE MIDDLE (WHICH IS GREATER THAN 6'-0"). CLARIFY.
9. SHEET S1.1; SEQUENCING CONSTRUCTION NOTE: THE NOTE INCLUDES VERBIAGE ON FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS. REMOVE.
10. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN (A13): THE PLAN SHOULD INDICATE WALLS ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH (WHERE A 21'-0" OPENING IS INDICATED). ON THE PLAN, IT APPEARS THERE IS NO WALL AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH. VERIFY.
11. SHEET S1.1 (LOADS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (DESIGN CRITERIA): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE WIND CRITERIA FOR EXPOSURE B, WHILE THE DRAWING NOTE INDICATES EXPOSURE C. CLARIFY AND REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED.
12. SHEET S1.1; FRAMING PLAN (A7): REVISE THE VERBIAGE IN THE BOX OF THE ELEVATION INDICATORS AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH WALLS.
13. SHEET S1.1; STRUCTURAL NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES SHRINKAGE CONTROL JOINTS. PROVIDE A DETAIL ON THE PLANS.
14. SHEET S1.1; ELEVATION J13: THE DETAIL INDICATED AT THE HEADER (N13/S1.1) IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
15. SHEET S1.2; LIGHT GAGE STEEL: NOTE 6 HAS AN ASTERISK AFTER THE STUD AND TRACK SIZE REFERENCES. EXPLAIN.
16. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE THE DESIGN OF THE 1/2" PLYWOOD ROOF.
17. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
11/22/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied A disconnecting means is required for building per
2005 NEC 225.31

Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Ck
PDSD, C of Tuc
11/22/2011
11/29/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 625 W. Auto Mall Drive
T11CM03462
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 29, 2011

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/06/2012 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/06/2012 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed