Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM03268
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE BUILDING CODES ARE INCORRECT. FOR THIS SHELL REVIEW, REVISE THE IBC TO 2006. 2. SHEET A1.0; CODE REVIEW: THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT AREA INDICATES 330 SF WITH 4 OCCUPANTS (OR 6 OCCUPANTS). THIS PERMIT IS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR SHELL ADDITION ONLY. INDICATE THE NEW SECOND FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE AND REMOVE THE REFERENCE TO THE T.I. AREA, OCCUPANT LOAD, EXITS REQUIRED, EXIT WIDTH, PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL, LENGTH OF TRAVEL, CORRIDOR DEAD ENDS, PLUMBING FIXTURES, AND PARKING CALCULATIONS. WHEN A TENANT MOVES INTO THIS SPACE (FIRST TENANT IN), THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD WILL CALCULATE THE NEW OCCUPANCY LOAD AND ADDRESS THE ADEQUACY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS. 3. SHEET S1.1; GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES: UNDER 'FOUNDATIONS', NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW. 4. SHEET S2.1; PLAN NOTES (NOTE 9): THE JOIST MANUFACTURER SHALL PROVIDE A LETTER AND/OR DETAILS TO MR. JAMES M. GALVIN CONCERNING THE ADEQUACY OF THE EXISTING STEEL JOIST PURLINS UNDER THE NEW MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WEIGHTS. PROVIDE THESE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW DURING THE NEXT SUBMITTAL. 5. SHEET S2.1 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 206): DETAIL 206 (CUT AT GRIDS 1.3 AND C.2, GRIDS 1.9 AND D.8, AND GRIDS 2.5 AND D.8) DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM B5 (OR B6) COMING INTO THE COLUMN. ADD A NOTE AND/OR SHOW THE BEAM. 6. SHEET S2.1 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 209): DETAIL 209 (CUT AT GRIDS 1.9 AND C.2) DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM B5 COMING INTO THE COLUMN. ADD A NOTE AND/OR SHOW THE BEAM. 7. SHEET S2.1 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 214): DETAIL 214 INDICATES A WOOD BEAM BELOW THE FLOOR FRAMING. THE DETAIL IS CUT ON THE PLAN AT A LOCATION THAT DOES NOT INDICATE A WOOD BEAM. CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S2.1 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 207A): DETAIL 207A (CUT AT GRIDS 2.5 AND C.9) DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM B8 COMING INTO THE COLUMN. ADD A NOTE AND/OR SHOW THE BEAM. 9. SHEET S2.1 (SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 207): DETAIL 207 (CUT AT GRIDS 1.3 AND C.9 AND GRIDS 1.9 AND C.9) DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM B5 (OR B6) COMING INTO THE COLUMN. ADD A NOTE AND/OR SHOW THE BEAM. 10. SHEET S3.1; PLAN 109: SECTION 110 DOES NOT INDICATE THE BEAM B3 COMING INTO THE STRINGER. SHOW THE BEAM. 11. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 213: INDICATE ON THE 4X4 BRACE ANGLE (ON THE LEFT) THE SPACING OF THAT ANGLE (EACH BEAM?). 12. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 213: INDICATE ON THE 4X4 BRACE ANGLE (ON THE RIGHT) THE SPACING OF THAT ANGLE. 13. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 213: INDICATE THE BENT PLATE SIZE AND CONNECTION AT THE TOP OF THE WOOD BEAM. PROVIDE A DIMENSION TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE BOLTS FROM THE TOP OF THE BEAM. 14. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 81); SHEET S4.1 (FLOOR DETAILS): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE 2-#4 CONTINUOUS AT THE PERIMETER OF THE CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB. THIS REINFORCING DOES NOT SHOW UP IN THE DETAILS. CLARIFY. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/25/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 10/26/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Additional floor area that is to be added must be parked based on the parking ratio for the use. The plan submitted does not provide any information related to parking. The development appears to be part of a larger complex where parking may not be an issue if there is excess parking and where there is a cross access/parking agreement in place. Provide a copy of the approved development or site plan with the next submittal. Zoning will re-review the plan on the next submittal to ensure that sufficient parking is available to cover the additional square footage that is to be added. |
| 10/28/2011 | RMYERS1 | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1.Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 10/28/2011 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SEE KEYNOTE NINE ON SHEET A1.0 SHOW HOW THE WASTE PIPING, AND OR WATER PIPING IS AFFECTED BY THE NEW COLUMN. INCLUDE ROUTING OF ALL REINSTALLED PIPING. INCLUDE ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL TYPES FOR REINSTALLATION. |
| 11/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/08/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/14/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/17/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |