Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM03205
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Fire notes: Separate permits are required for tanks. |
| 10/14/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET CA-1; CANOPY PLAN: NOTE 2 INDICATES TO SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THE CONCRETE PAVING. WHERE IS THAT LOCATED ON THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED? 2. SHEET CA-2; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 2 INDICATES A SOIL BEARING CAPACITY OF 3250 PSF, WHILE THE REFERENCED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TABLE ON PAGE 17 ALLOWS A SMALLER CAPACITY. VERIFY AND REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED. 3. SHEET CA-4; SECTION C: A NOTE INDICATES TO SEE SHEET E1 FOR THE TUBE COLUMN SIZE. REVISE THE NOTE (NO SHEET E1). 4. SHEET CA-4.1; SECTION E: A NOTE INDICATES TO SEE SHEET E1 FOR THE TUBE COLUMN SIZE. REVISE THE NOTE (NO SHEET E1). 5. SHEET CA-7; PLAN 1: ARE ANY OF THE CMU CORES FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND/OR REINFORCING? VERIFY. 6. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 7. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/27/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | ASee comments for T11CM03197. Ray T Majuta 10/29/11 |
| 10/27/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/28/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 10/28/2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/02/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |