Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03204
Parcel: 13225066A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T11CM03204
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/22/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF EXSISTING LOCATION /METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - SITE PLAN A100 - CHAD AMATEAU - 740-6547
11/28/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
11/28/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Comment not resolved; a backflow preventer has a pressure drop only when the water is flowing. The static pressure downstream of the backflow preventer will be the same as the upstream pressure under static conditions. Provide an approved pressure reducing valve to control the water pressure. [Original comment: Show how the water pressure supply will be limited to less than 80 PSI (water pressure range given as 73 - 85 PSI). Reference: Section 608.2, UPC 2006.]
2. Comment not resolved. Clarify the water pressure calculations; without a diagram of the water distribution piping, the calculations cannot be followed. In addition, the site plan shows one water meter on the site - does it also serve the south building? How can mechanical equipment, with their continuous demands, be compared to the demand of a drinking fountain that is sporadically used (see Section A2.2, UPC 2006)? If you are basing your calculations on demand flow in individual branch pipes, you must be sure to use the correct demand curve to determine the flow; e.g. 17 fixture units in a flush valve system has a demand equal to about 33 GPM, not 13 GPM. [Original comment: One of the specified fixtures (Haws emergency eye/face wash) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 25-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. (Note also, that eye/face wash units are required to deliver a minimum of 3 GPM according to ANSI Standard Z358.1-2009.)]
3. Clarify the lift used in the calculations. The shortest building (the south building) on site is 20 feet high, the west infill is 51.5 feet tall, and the remainder of the buildings range from 22 feet to 37 feet tall. [Original comment: Verify that the static lift used in the water pressure calculations will provide adequate water service to the evaporative coolers located at the top of the 51'- 6"-foot tall building. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.]
4. Comment not resolved; the fixture connection schedule still shows the wash fountains counted as only 1 fixture unit each. [Original comment: Clarify the water fixture unit calculations; if 92 existing fixture units are to remain and 19 water fixture units are to be added, how does the total amount of water fixture units equal 88? In addition, a hand wash fountain is not 1 water fixture unit; see Table A-2 for either "washup, each set of faucets" or "washfountain, circular spray" for the correct figure.]
12/05/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied REVIEW OF RESUBMITTAL COMPLETED BY RON BROWN FOR ORIGINAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB

1. COMMENT3: Add corridors to Fire Rating Menu with 0 rating required
NO CORRECTION MADE/NON-RESPONSIVE

2. Additional Comment: Your Building Code requirements have been changed to "2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. All private projects are to comply with the 2006 IBC which uses Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition for accessibility requirements. A 2010 ADASAD review may be conducted on an approved appeal from the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. If so desired, please submit a completed appeal form requesting an 2010 ADASAD review for your project. A fee of $132.50 is required for the appeal process.
END OF REVIEW
12/05/2011 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
12/08/2011 SREEVES1 ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/22/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/22/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed