Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03204
Parcel: 13225066A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM03204
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/06/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/11/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 12, 2011
SUBJECT: 4798 S Julian Ave- Engineering Review
TO: Metro Permit Inc., Attn: Lisa Bower
LOCATION: T14S R14E Sec34 Ward 5
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T11CM03204 (Building Plan)

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the building plan set (T11CM03204) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:

BUILDING PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02: Provide a revised site plan application for the new proposed site plan that has been included with the proposed building plan set. The new site plan sheet differs from the last approved site plan (T11CM02529) which was also included in the set. It appears that a new handicap parking spot has been added to the parking lay out that was not included on the last approved site plan sheet.

2) Provide a grading plan application for review of the civil sheets provided within the building plan submittal set. Per the civil sheets there are other improvements proposed on site that are not clearly shown on the last approved or new proposed site plan. Specifically the proposed drainage swale located along the west property line (Section Z-Z on Sheet C-1).

3) Revise the civil sheets so that they match the proposed site plan in location of all PAALs, site layout, fencing (existing and/or proposed), employee parking area, etc.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise Sheet G-2 to correctly label the 2.5 foot over hang for the wheel stop barrier at the handicap parking space located south of the 11,964 GSF building. Per the sheet a handicap sign is located within the clear 2.5 foot overhang and must be relocated outside to meet requirements.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.11: Revise Sheet C-1 to clearly label and dimension the required 24-foot PAAL widths adjacent to existing loading zone on the east side of the 7,198 GSF building within the vehicular use area. Verify all 2-way PAALs meet the minimum 24 feet. Per the civil sheet there is now a drainage swale proposed that may reduce the minimum 24-foot width between the swale and the loading zone area.

6) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.12: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap and ANSI Standard requirements that may apply to this project.

7) Engineering will re-review the building plan with the next site plan submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. A building plan can not be issued prior to all site plan comments being addressed.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan application, grading plan application and civil sheets that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services
10/19/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET D100; DEMOLITION PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN.
2. SHEET A000: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
3. SHEET A100; CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: ADD CORRIDORS TO THIS LIST, WITH FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF 0 PER THE IBC TABLE 1017.1.
4. SHEET A201; TOILET ELEVATION 4: LOCATE THE PAPER DISPENSER.
5. SHEET A201; PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN: INDICATE THE SECTION CUT 1/A401 ON THE PLAN.
6. SHEET A202 (PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A302 (ELEVATION 3): SHOW THE ACCESS LADDER ON THE FLOOR PLAN.
7. SHEET A203; ROOF PLAN (EAST ADDITION): INDICATE THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF PLAN.
8. SHEET A203; ROOF PLAN (WEST ADDITION): ADD THE NUMBERED GRID LINES ON THIS PLAN.
9. SHEET A301; ELEVATIONS: ARE SECTION CUTS 9/A401 AND 10/A401 ON VARIOUS ELEVATIONS CORRECT? VERIFY.
10. SHEET A302; ELEVATIONS: ARE SECTION CUTS 9/A401, 10/A401, AND 11/A401 ON VARIOUS ELEVATIONS CORRECT? VERIFY.
11. SHEET S100; FOUNDATIONS: NOTE 1 INDICATES A SOIL REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW (IT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE WEST ADDITION FOUNDATION REVIEW).
12. SHEET S200: THIS SHEET SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THIS PERMIT SET SINCE IT WAS APPROVED UNDER PERMIT NUMBER T11CM02529, OR A NOTE SHOULD BE PLACED ON THIS SHEET STATING THAT INFORMATION.
13. SHEET S201; MID-LEVEL FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN.
14. SHEET S202; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE NOTE BELOW THE PLAN TITLE REFERENCES SHEET S103 FOR BEAM AND JOIST SCHEDULES. REVISE THE NOTE.
15. SHEET S202 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S500 (DETAIL 205): IS DETAIL 205 (AT GRIDS E AND 2) CORRECT FOR THE LOCATION SHOWN ON THE PLAN? VERIFY.
16. SHEET S202; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLAN.
17. SHEET S203; BRACED FRAME ELEVATION: IS THE DETAIL 209 SIM. INDICATED ON THE FRAME CORRECT? VERIFY.
18. SHEET S203; BRACED FRAME ELEVATION: WHAT IS THE C5 BELOW THE FRAME? VERIFY.
19. SHEET S203; MID-LEVEL FRAMING PLAN: THE ELEVATIONS NOTED 1, 2, AND 3 SHOULD BE TO SHEET S301. REVISE.
20. SHEET S203; ALL PLANS: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS.
21. SHEET S203; FOUNDATION PLAN: ON THE SOUTH WALL NEAR GRID J, THERE IS A DETAIL 112 INDICATED ON THE PLAN. REVISE (NO DETAIL 112 SHOWN).
22. SHEET S204; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE ELEVATIONS NOTED 1, 2, AND 3 SHOULD BE TO SHEET S301. REVISE.
23. SHEET S204; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS.
24. SHEET S400; DETAIL 103: ADD THE DETAIL NOTES.
25. SHEET S500; DETAIL 207: INDICATE THE BENT PLATE (NOTE 5) WIDTH AND LEG LENGTHS. PROVIDE BOLT SPACING.
26. SHEET S500; DETAIL 208: INDICATE THE BENT PLATE (NOTE 7) WIDTH AND LEG LENGTHS. PROVIDE BOLT SPACING.
27. SHEET S500; DETAIL 209 (PLAN A): SHOULD NOTE 4 ON PLAN A BE NOTE 7? INDICATE HOW THE 6X6 ANGLE IS CONNECTED TO THE COLUMN.
28. SHEET S500; DETAILS 207 AND 208: INDICATE IN NOTE 3 THAT THE BRACE OCCURS AT EACH PURLIN.
29. SHEET S501; DETAIL 213: ADD NOTE 6 TO THIS DETAIL.
30. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV.
31. GENERAL: PROVIDE KEY PLANS IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE FRAME AND FOOTING LOCATIONS, INDICATING EAST OR WEST ADDITIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE FRAME ON CALCULATION SHEET 35 INDICATES W10X33 AT MEMBERS M11 THROUGH M18, BUT NO W10X33'S ARE IN THE BEAM SCHEDULE.
32. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
10/24/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
10/25/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the envelope energy compliance calculations. Do the calculations cover just one of the additions or both the east and the west additions? Why are the doors omitted from the calculations?
2. If the pyramid deflectors for the make-up air units are 45-feet above the finished floor in the west addition, clarify how the make-up air units are capable of maintaining a minimum temperature of 68 F at 3-feet above the finished floor on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Sections 309.1 and 312.1, IMC 2006.
3. The east addition does not show any source of heating. If the space is intended for occupancy, show how the space will maintain a minimum temperature of 68 F at 3-feet above the finished floor on a design heating day (32 F). Reference: Sections 309.1 and 312.1, IMC 2006.
10/25/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide the operating weight for the relocated water heater along with structural calculations to show that the existing wall is capable of safely supporting the water heater. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
2. Provide a watertight pan of corrosion-resistant material under the relocated water heater with a drain to an approved location. Reference: Section 508.4, UPC 2006.
3. Show how the water pressure supply will be limited to less than 80 PSI (water pressure range given as 73 - 85 PSI). Reference: Section 608.2, UPC 2006.
4. One of the specified fixtures (Haws emergency eye/face wash) requires a minimum pressure greater than the 25-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. (Note also, that eye/face wash units are required to deliver a minimum of 3 GPM according to ANSI Standard Z358.1-2009.)
5. Verify that the static lift used in the water pressure calculations will provide adequate water service to the evaporative coolers located at the top of the 51'- 6"-foot tall building. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
6. Clarify the water fixture unit calculations; if 92 existing fixture units are to remain and 19 water fixture units are to be added, how does the total amount of water fixture units equal 88? In addition, a hand wash fountain is not 1 water fixture unit; see Table A-2 for either "washup, each set of faucets" or "washfountain, circular spray" for the correct figure.
11/01/2011 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied FOR QUESTIONS ABOUT CORRECTION COMMENTS PLEASE CONTACT DAN SANTA-CRUZ @ 520-909-5173

1) ERRATA-- PP E101 INDICATES TRAVEL CRANE IS ON CKT 8,10,12 WHILE PANEL SCHEDULE HAS IT ON 7,9,11.
[THIS CORRECTION MAY BE MADE AS A SIMPLE RED-LINE TO PLANS]

2) PLEASE PROVIDE IECC LIGHTING COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
11/03/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED PCRWRD REVIEW OF EXSISTING LOCATION /METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - SITE PLAN A100 - CHAD AMATEAU - 740-6547
NEED 5TH FLOOR WW CREDIT EVALUATION FOR REMOVAL OF 1 TOILET - 1 URINAL & 2 SHOWERS PER DRAWING P2.1

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/16/2011 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/16/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed