Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM03202
Parcel: 10511061R

Address:
220 W WETMORE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM03202
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/11/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/12/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Engineering will re-review the building plan once the proposed development plan D11-0033 is approved. A building plan can not be issued prior to all development plan comments being addressed.

The proposed outside patios encroach into the required pedestrian side walk around the building. DP and building plan need to clearly show the required 5-foot width for the sidewalks and/or the required 84-inch height requirement from the sidewalk to the roof overhang per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.B
10/18/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEET A1.0
1. In the Building Code Summary Schedule, please indicate that the building has an existing sprinkler system.
2. In the Building Codes and Governing Agencies, please delete the ADAAG reference and reference the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
SHEET A3.0
3. At doors 102a and 102d, please insure accessible clearances on the strike side of the doors as required by ICC-ANSI 117.1, Section 404.
4. The accessible urinal stall needs to be 36" wide with a 24" deep screen as per ICC-ANSI 117.1, Sections 605.3 and 305.
5. Note needs proof reading: i.e. "plbing" and detail reference 19/A9.1 should be 19/A9.0.
6. Note 25 states that the doors to both toilets are to have a min of 32" clearance.
a. Please confirm the existing door clearance of 32" between face of open door and door stop as per Figure 404.2.2. A 32" wide door will not meet the opening requirement.
7. Note reference 27 located in the kitchen does not appear to be correct.
8. Correct note 36 to read "2006 IBC, ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
9. Correct note 40 to read "2006 IBC, ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
10. Add detail reference number to note 46.
SHEET A/3.1
11. Urinal stall with needs to be 3'-0"
SHEET A/8.2
12. Please show how the urinals deplicted meet ICC-ANSI 117.1, Section 605.
13. Ditto comment 11.
SHEET S2.0
14. Detail 203 shows 1'-6" to f.g. w/ 1#4 t&b while calcs, page 32, calls for 1'0" wide x 24" deep w/2#4s t & b. Please clarify.
15. Detail 201 shows 1'-6" to f.g. while calcs, page 32, calls for 24" deep. 2#4s t & b are correctly shown. Please clarify.
END OF REVIEW
10/19/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
10/21/2011 LEERAY HANLY ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/26/2011 LEERAY HANLY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/26/2011 CAGUILA1 ZONING REVIEW Needs Review
10/26/2011 LHANLY1 WATER REVIEW Approved
10/26/2011 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
10/26/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Needs Review