Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM03169
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/12/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/12/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/20/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET T1; BUILDING CODE: ADD THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO THIS SHEET (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003). 2. GENERAL; STRUCTURAL: NO CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOUNDATION DESIGN WERE INCLUDED FOR THIS REVIEW. PROVIDE. 3. GENERAL; STRUCTURAL: NO DRAWINGS OR CALCULATIONS FOR THE PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING WERE INCLUDED FOR THIS REVIEW. IS THIS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL? VERIFY. 4. SHEET S4; SECTION AT STEPPED FOOTING: THIS SECTION SHOULD BE 5/S4. VERIFY. 5. SHEET A1; GENERAL NOTES: NOTE C INDICATES TO SEE THE P.E.M.B. (PRE-ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING) DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. IS THIS TO BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. VERIFY. 6. SHEET A1; SECTION 2: THE BOXED NOTE INDICATES THE ALTERNATE CONDITION OF THE HEADER WALL RUNNING PERPENDICULAR TO THE ROOF PURLINS. IS THAT WHAT IS SHOWN IN THIS SECTION? PROVIDE VERBIAGE FOR THE HEADER WALL PARALLEL TO THE PURLINS. 7. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: THE SECTION CUT 5/A4 ON THE EAST WALL SHOULD BE 3/A4 (AND INDICATED IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION). VERIFY. 8. SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN); SECTION CUT 5/A4 SIM. ON THE SOUTH WALL: IS THIS SECTION SIMILAR? VERIFY. 9. SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN); SECTIONS 3 AND 4: SECTION 3 INDICATES INTERIOR WALLS EXTEND TO THE ROOF STRUCTURE, WHILE SECTION 4 INDICATES THE INTERIOR WALL AT THE RESTROOM STOPS AT THE CEILING. CLARIFY. 10. SHEET A1; FLOOR PLAN: AN ENLARGED PLAN 10/A4 IS INDICATED ALONG THE WEST WALL. THAT ENLARGED PLAN INCLUDES ONLY A SMALL AREA AROUND THE STRUCTURAL COLUMN, WHILE THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES A MUCH LARGER AREA. CLARIFY. 11. SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN); ENLARGED PLAN 6/A5: THE ENLARGED PLAN SHOULD BE ROTATED TO MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN. 12. SHEET A1 (KEY NOTES); SHEET S1 (KEYNOTES): NOTE 3 ON SHEET A1 INDICATES TO REFER TO THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR THE FLOOR SAFE LOCATION, WHILE NOTE 1 ON SHEET S1 INDICATES TO REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL FOR PLAN LOCATION. CLARIFY. 13. SHEET A4; WALL SECTION 1: THE DETAIL 5/A2 AT THE SILL IS NOT CORRECT. VERIFY. 14. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. RON.BOOSE@TUCSONAZ.GOV. 15. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/21/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 10/28/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide structural calculations to verify that the roof is capable of supporting the dead load due to the installation of the condensing units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Show how adequate access is being provided for the equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2006. 5. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted when the building is occupied. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. |
| 11/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is to be limited with the proposed tankless water heater (i.e. will it be factory set to a maximum temperature?). Note that the proposed tankless water heater will not turn on unless the flow exceeds 0.75 GPM: the maximum flow rate for the lavatories is 0.5 GPM. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 2. The maximum flow rates for plumbing fixtures shall be consistent with ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12, 45-313. (See text at: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp). In addition, accessible metering faucets shall remain open for a minimum of 10 seconds. Reference: Section 402.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 3. Provide water supply isometrics. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a shut off valve for the building water service entrance. Reference: Section 605.2, UPC 2006. 5. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 6. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 7. Provide protection of the trap seals for all floor drains subject to infrequent use. Reference: Sections 1007.0 and 1007.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 8. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. |
| 11/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies for the building water service are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf 2. Verify that a ¾" water meter is available through Tucson water. |
| 11/02/2011 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Provide available ground fault information and ground fault calculations to justify rating of equipment. 2) Provide IECC lighting code compliance certificate 3) Provide all exterior lighting information showing complinace with the Pima County / City of Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 11/08/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need 5th fl WW credit evaluation - 740-6602 or 740-6606 need to show location/method of connection to public sewer site DP CC2 does not match bldg pl plan P-1 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/10/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/10/2011 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |