Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM03166
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/07/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/08/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/09/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | From: David Rivera Principal Planner - Zoning Review Section Development Services Department December 9, 2011 Zoning has reviewed the building plans and compared them t o the approved development plan. While the design is similar to the approved DP, the square footage listed on the DP is smaller than what is calculated while using the dimensions and comparing them to the dimensions on the floor plan of the building plans set. The square footage on the building plans appears to be greater than what has been approved on the DP. This would require that the DP be revised to match the proposed construction building plans. At this time zoning cannot approve the building plans until the square footage difference is clarified and the DP is revised to match the building plans or visa versa. |
| 12/12/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED 5TH FLOOR WW CREDIT EVALUATION IF APPLICABLE- 740-6602 OR 740-6606 |
| 12/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved; the 11"x17" copy of an unsealed, unapproved drawing is insufficient. Provide a full-size copy of the private utility drawing approved by the City of Tucson that shows the requested information for reference. [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.] |
| 12/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. See the City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 IMC for the minimum condensate drain size requirements. Note that when two or more units are tied together, the minimum drain size shall be 1". 2. The envelope energy compliance certificate (COMcheck) has been changed to increase the size of the building from 10,600 square feet to 11,988 square feet but the building data on sheet A0.0 shows a building area of 12,737 square feet. Verify the data used to determine the envelope energy compliance. Note also that the town of Pima, Arizona, is located in Graham County and is in climate zone 3b. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope using "Pima County, Arizona: 2006 IECC for locations < 4,000 feet", which is in climate zone 2b. You can find "Pima County, Arizona" in the drop-down menu under the tool bar heading of "Code" in COMcheck. |
| 12/20/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Door 8 lacks the accessible strike clearance required by ANSI 117.1, Section 404.3.2.1, 12" with a lock and a closer. END OF VIEW |
| 12/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved; the 11"x17" copy of an unsealed, unapproved drawing is insufficient. Provide a full-size copy of the private utility drawing approved by the City of Tucson that shows the requested information for reference. [Initial comment: Provide site drawing showing the size, route, cleanouts, and slope of the building sewer. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.] 2. The temperature limit stop provided with the specified lavatory faucet appears to limit only the proportion of the hot and cold water delivered by the faucet, not the temperature of the water. Given the temperature range of the water supply in Tucson (as high as 90.3 degrees Fahrenheit); specify how the temperature limit stop on the lavatory faucet is to be adjusted seasonally to guarantee a maximum delivery temperature of 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. [Initial comment: Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006.] 3. The minimum residual water pressure is 15 PSI unless it can be shown that no specified fixtures or appliances require minimum residual pressures greater than 8 PSI. Note that the specified drinking fountain requires a minimum residual pressure of 20 PSI. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. [Initial comment: Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/27/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/27/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |