Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T11CM03081
Parcel: 13331159T

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM03081
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/21/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied SHEETS A3.0 AND A4.0
1. As indicated on your drawings the structural details and calculations for the new Trellis System and the Canopy Sun Screen System are to be submitted at a later dater date by your contractor/supplier. These items are considered deferred submitalls and require an additional plan review fee. Please submit a letter to our building official, Mr. Ron Boose, listing these items as deferred submittals for additional fee assessment.
SHEETS A3.2 AND S4.0
2. On all wall sections and structural details where exterior signage is to be provided, please shown structural details and calculations for their support.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
SHEET CV
3. Noted in your building code list, you have indicated the 2010 ADA Standards as your accessibility code. The City of Tucson has adopted the 2006 IBC as the governing building code which utilizes Chapter 11 and ICC~ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition as the governing accessibility code. A 2010 ADA standards review is vailable upon submission and approval of an appeal to the building official. The appeal form is available on our web site. A fee of $132.50 is required. Once the appeal has been judicated, an accessible review of your project may be conducted.
SHEET A1.1
4. Please show the existing roof slope and drain system on the roof plan along with the location of the HVAC units and new roof walkways as specified in note 3.
SHEET S1.0
5. Please provide special inspection certifications for those items as listed by your structural engineer as required.
6. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO ALL COMMENTS.
END OF REVIEW
10/26/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 26, 2011
SUBJECT: 8800 E Broadway Blvd #101 Site Plan- Engineering Review
TO: MPE, Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: T14S R15E Sec15 Ward 2
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: T11CM03081 (Site Plan)


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Site Plan (T11CM03081) for the above referenced property. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the site plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN COMMENTS:

1) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.2: Revise the site plan to provide a property and/or legal description.

2) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Provide a copy of the last approved site plan so that the parking layout can be verified along with the correct required number of parking space. Refer to Zoning comments.

3) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to provide a dimension for the drive thru exit located at the "DO NOT ENTER" PAAL location.

4) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.8: Revise the site plan to label the wheel stop barriers to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to all landscape areas and/or the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path.

5) DS Sec.2-02.2.1.A.10: Revise the site plan to label and dimension both existing and future Sight Visibility Triangles (SVTs). Verify that the SVTs shown match the last approved site plan and that none of the existing structures fall within the clear line of sight.


BUILDING PLAN:

6) Engineering will re-review the building plan with the next site plan submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. A building plan can not be issued prior to all site plan comments being addressed.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised site plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Enclose "redlines" with the resubmittal package.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the site plan review.

For questions or to schedule an appointment I can be reached at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
COT Planning & Development Services
10/26/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: 8800 E. Broadway Blvd
T11CM03081
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 26, 2011

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
10/28/2011 RICK MYERS PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHOW SIZE, LOCATION, AND MODEL NUMBER OF HAMMER ARRESTORS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE COLD WATER SYSTEM. REFERENCE: 604.9 2006 IPC. 2. CLARIFY WASTE AND VENT PIPING ISOMETRIC ON SHEET P-1.0 WHICH DRAIN IS "SAN" AND WHICH IS "GREASE WASTE". 3. SHOW HOW THE HORIZONTALLY WET VENTED FIXTURES FOR THE TWO BATHROOMS, QUALIFIES AS A "BATHROOM GROUP". REFERENCE: CHAPTER TWO, DEFINITION OF "BATHROOM GROUP". REFERENCE 909.1 2006 IPC; HORIZONTAL WET VENT PERMITTED. ANY COMBINATION OF FIXTURES WITHIN TWO BATHROOM GROUPS.... AND A BATHROOM GROUP IS DEFINED AS A WATER CLOSET, LAVATORY, BATHTUB OR SHOWER, INCLUDING OR EXCLUDING A BIDET, AN EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN OR BOTH. WASTE AND VENT PIPING PLAN ON SHEET P1.0 SHOWS THREE WATER CLOSETS AND A URINAL.
11/03/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Provide energy code compliance calculations for the additions to the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the additions to the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4, 101.4.3, and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
11/04/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM03081
8800 E Broadway
TI Restaurant

1. Indicate if all or only some lighting fixtures are being changed out. If change out's are significant the loads in the panel schedules must be changed accordingly.
2. If all or majority of fixtures are being changed, provide a
Budget Lighting Calculation according to 2006 IECC.
3. Some fixtures show a fixture type and a circuit, however no panel designation ?
4. Following circuits are new on following panels ,cannot be found on electrical sheets, Panel LP, 3,15,17,19. If located on other sheets please print out on electrical sheets.Also
Panel AP 3,14,22.circuits not found on electrical sheets.
5. Show a size fuse or circuit breaker for the Main Disconnect.
6. Sheet E1.0 indicates new supply from Utility, per Riser Notes , also notes appear to indicate that contractor is to upgrade capacity of service if required. Please indicate on plan if service is to be upgraded or not, not to be left to contractor on site.Provide exact information if service to be upgraded or not. If upgraded ----- would require confirmation of grounding system and fault current changes at service.


Ray T Majuta
Elect Pln Review
PDSD, CoT,
11/8/11
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
11/08/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/15/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/15/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed