Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM03041
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Sheet LS1 The fourth exit cannot go though the receiving area as shown. The path does not meet IFC Section 1014.2 and it is a higher hazard area due to the high rack storage. In addition there is no exit sign on Sheet E1. See IFC 1011. Sheet E3 A fire alarm system is required by IFC 907.2.7. A separate submittal is required. Sheet FP1 A separate submittal and permit is required for the fire sprinkler system. |
| 09/21/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Site plan approval is required. |
| 09/23/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | STRUCTURAL COMMENTS 1. SHEET S0; FOUNDATION SUBSURFACE PREPARATION: A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS REFERENCED, BUT WAS NOT FOUND IN THE PROJECT SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. PROVIDE. 2. SHEET S0; TRUCK ACCESS WALL REINFORCING ELEVATION: A NOTE INDICATES TO REFERENCE THE CMU WALL SCHEDULE FOR THE SIZE AND SPACING OF THE REINFORCING. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE. 3. SHEET S1; FOUNDATION PLAN: A NOTE 9 AT GRIDS E AND 2 REFERENCES CIVIL FOR A LIGHT POLE, IF REQUIRED. IS A LIGHT POLE REQUIRED? IF SO, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS AND A FOOTING, AND INCLUDE THESE ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. SHEETS S1 AND S3: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 5. SHEET S2: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE CMU WALL REINFORCING DIAGRAM. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE (3/S4 FOR THE REINFORCING DIAGRAM, 6/S4 FOR THE REINFORCING SCHEDULE). 6. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS, MECHANICAL UNITS AND THEIR SIZES (3 TON, 5 TON, ETC.) ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. FOR STRUCTURAL PURPOSES, LIST THE ACTUAL OPERATING WEIGHTS OF THE UNITS ON THE PLAN, OR LIST IN A PLAN NOTE (REFERENCE 3/S4.1). 7. SHEET S5: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE EMBED SCHEDULE, DIAPHRAGM DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE, AND THE CMU WALL REINFORCING DIAGRAM. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE FOR THESE. 8. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; BEAM SUMMARY: PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR JOIST LOCATIONS. 9. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. 11. Please provide special inspections as listed in the Conditions section of this permit application. 12. Please provide structural calculations for the following: a. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment b. Flag Pole foundations c. 10' RCMU fencing and gates d. Blowers mounted above the Pharmacy toilet room e. Pylon Sign support foundation 13. Please provide an approved site development plan. 14. Please coordinate sheet SP-1 with approved site plan and finish detailing the accessible parking and bollards. 15. At detail 3/A-5.2 the accessible urinal screen is to have 3'-0" clearance as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 606.2 and 305.7. 16. Please provide all required accessible dimensions on section 4/A-5.2 END OF REVIEW |
| 10/05/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the architectural details for the design of the mounting shelf for the thermal expansion tank noted in detail 5/P4. Reference: Sections 106.3.1 and 301.2, IPC 2006. 2. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2006. 3. Provide information on the heat exchanger and the heat exchanger medium used for the refrigeration heat recovery system and the heat exchanger construction. Reference: Section 608.16.3, IPC 2006. 4. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 2/P1. Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2006. 5. Revise details 1 and 2 on sheet P2 to provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sinks, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartments only; the sinks appear to be plumbed correctly on detail 1/P4. (If, however, all of the compartments of a 3-compartment sink are used for food preparation, all of the compartments shall be indirectly wasted.) Reference: Section 802.1, IPC 2006. 6. Provide the basis for sizing the drainage system for the evaporative condensers and show that the size of the indirect waste receptor (SS1) is adequate to accommodate the expected flow without splashing, flooding, or overloading the drain from the indirect waste receptor. Reference: Section 802.3.1, IPC 2006. 7. Show how the rain water on the roof over the receiving area will be drained. Reference: Sections 1101.2, 1101.7, and 1107.1, IPC 2006. 8. Verify that 5-PSIG natural gas is available from Southwest Gas. Reference: Section 402.3, IFGC 2006. |
| 10/05/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (Pima, Arizona is a small town in Graham County). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Verify the wall types used in the calculations; no solid-grouted walls appear on the drawings. Glass doors are not to be calculated as windows but as glass doors. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide structural details to show how the kitchen hoods are to be supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (includes the weight of one person working on each hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 4. Provide justification for the use of a Type II hood over the gas-fired bakery oven. Reference: Section 507.2, IMC 2006. |
| 10/05/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Walmart - 2530 S. Kolb Road T11CM03041 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 5, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/05/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the size of the water meter and the size of the reduced pressure backflow preventer serving this building. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006. |
| 10/12/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER. NEED PCRWRD REIVEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU- 740-6647 NEED PCRWRD 3RD FLOOR CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM 740-6200 NEED IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR - TOM TOMCHAK - 5025 W INA RD - 442-6200 NEED TO SUBMIT DEMO DRAWINGS SHOWING ALL WASTERWATER PLUMBING FIXTURES REMOVED FOR WASTEWATER CONNECTIO FEE CREDIT - NEED 5TH FLOOR MAPS & RECORDS CREDIT EVALUATION - 740-6602 |
| 10/19/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM03041 New Walmart 2530 S Kolb 1. Provide information on EDC1 unit such as specification sheet on electrical and a discription of the unit. 2. The electrical room appears to require panic hardware on egress doos as per 2005 NEC,110.26(C).2. 3. Provide electrical information sheets such as specification on electrical also a discription on Hybrid House Units DTA and MTB. 4. The Utility Service Requirement Book for Tucson Electric Co, indicates that for a 1200 amp 277/480 volt service fed from a pad mounted transformer the fault current is 32,600 amps. Where does the figure you use (69,126 amps) originate ? 5. The difference in fault current between Rack A and Rack B Disconnects is 16,296 amps, the difference in distance is 28', is this correct ? how was if figured? 6. Indicate on Sheet E-4, that the service will require a GFP Test per 2005 NEC 230.95.C Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, COT, 10/19/11 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/20/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |