Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM03011
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/19/2011 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Walmart @ 8640 E. Broadway Blvd T11CM03011 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 21, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and any changes to the site. Once a building square footage expansion calculation is provided that is cumulative to the last approved full code compliance site plan this comment may change. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with your next submittal. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 It appears that a land lease is proposed. Per LUC 4.1.2 a land lease is the same as a lot split. Per the Zoning Administrator, if the proposed land lease will not result in a new parcel number the lease would not be considered a lot split. If this is the case remove all dimensions and bears from the proposed lease area and call it out as "PROJECT AREA". If the lease area will result in a new parcel number, show the lease area lines as proposed and provide a note indicating that the lot split is to be recorded under separate instrument. Zoning acknowledges that we have no regulation that requires the public to process a lot split application when the property is over 2.5 acres. If the lease area results in a new parcel number provide the lot dimension and bearing for the northern most lease area line. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For the existing building provide the size, height, overhangs and canopies, on the site plan. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Provide dimension for the distances between buildings on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension from the 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a PAAL width dimension from the proposed striped island, located just east of the "EX. WATER STATION", to the parking located to the north. 8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 For the proposed vehicle parking shown along the west side of the proposed Walmart, provide an overhang dimension that shows that the minimum sidewalk width, 4'-0", is maintained or provide wheel stops to for the parking spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide typical parking space details for both handicapped and standard spaces. 10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Short Term Bike Rack detail shows 27 3/8" from center of rack to center of rack. Note B calls out 48" between racks. Per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 and 3.3.9.5.B revise the detail to show the correct 48" between racks. 11. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 It appears that there is some type of wall located north of the proposed short-term bicycle parking. Demonstrate on the detail that the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.7 met. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show the existing, and if applicable future, Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT's) on the plan. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk shown along the west side of the proposed Walmart. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.1.B for the proposed Walmart drive-thru on the plan. 15. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2 along the entire south side of the property as curbing is proposed. 16. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Demonstrate the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2 the south side of the proposed Walmart building and loading area wall. 17. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There are numerous power poles, light poles, and utility equipment that appear to encroach into the access lane shown along the south side of the proposed Walmart. Demonstrate on the plan how the minimum access lane width is maintained. See LUC Section 3.3.6.4. 18. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines. That said provide some type of barrier to prevent vehicle from overhanging the property line on the south side of the proposed west parking area. 19. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 There is an existing sign shown just northeast of the "EX. WATER STATION" shown to be relocated. Based on the most current aerial photos there is no sign in this location. 20. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label both Broadway and Camino Seco as "MS&R". 21. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show adjacent zoning all adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys. 22. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.6 Provide a percentage of building area expansion calculation on the site plan. If the building has been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 23. Provide a copy of the cross access/parking for this center. Provide a note on the plan stating "CROSS ACCESS/PARKING AGREEMENT WOULD BE RECORDED AT TIME OF LOT SPLIT RECORDATION." 24. Depending on how the above comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 09/23/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a large scale detail of the ramp/stair (?) access on the most Easterly end of the marked crossing from the North East corner of the Walmart store to the Existing Shops to Remain. 2. Please provide a marked crossing from the accessible parking group in front of Walmart, accross the PAAL, to the accessible route in front of Walmart. Insure the markings are distinctly different from those of the front entance paving warning markings already shown on the plan. 3. Detectable warning strips are not required by the 2006 IBC/ICC-ANSI 117.1 as shown at the front entrance of the building. 4. Please show a large scale detail of the accessible parking group showing all code requirements including dimensions, slopes, signage, markings, accessible routes, marked crossings, detectable warnings and etc. 5. On Sheet 3.0 a paving slope of 3.89% is shown heading directly to the most Northerly marked crossing shown at the North East corner of Walmart. Please indicate how the slopes transition to a maxium cross slope of 2% accross the marked crossing as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/03/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 10/03/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/13/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show sight visibility triangles at each driveway location and at the truck route into the shopping center. Show both existing and future SVTs. (DS 2-02.2.10) 2. Clearly label distances and bearing for all lot lines as well as for the Walmart lease area. Show the entire existing parcel on the overall site plan. (DS 2-02.2.5) 3. Clearly show all easements affecting the property along with recordation information. Clearly describe the drainage easement through which the existing storm drains pass. 4. The grading notes reference MAG STD DTlLs. Since they are not routinely used and available in Tucson, either provide copies of each referenced standard detail within the plan sheets or reference City of Tucson/ Pima County standard details. 5. Show conditions outside of the project site to a sufficient degree to demonstrate how the site will function with the neighboring properties. 6. Clarify the separation between the parking stalls and truck route to the west of the existing shops. |
| 10/14/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of all manholes and cleanouts Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/28/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/28/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |