Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM02917
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/18/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/20/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS ARE SHOW IN ALL CAPS 1. OK 2. OK 3. OK 4. OK SHEET A6.0 5. Please provide all required accessible code requirements on the actual toilet plans and elevations. THE NEW MEN'S TOILET ROOM DOES NOT MEET ACCESSIBLE CODE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE SHOW ALL ACCESSIBLE REQUIREMENTS AS PER 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND ICC ANSI 117.1, 2003 EDITION ON THE DESIGNED TOILET ELEVATIONS. 6. The accessible toilet stall in toilet 101 is not compliant as per ICC/ANSI 11.7, Section 1109.1, 604.8 and your detail 14/A7. THE MEN'S ACCESSIBLE TOILET STAL DOES NOT MEET CODE. THE TOILET CLEARANCE MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 59" X 60". YOUR DESIGN AT DETAIL 3/A6.0 SCALES (NO DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN) 38" WIDE. ALSO, REFERENCE YOUR DETAIL 14/A7. 7. The urinal clearance is not compliant as per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 1109.1, 605 and 305. THE URINAL ACCESSIBLE CLEARANCE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE. THE URNIAL STALL CLEARANCE WIDTH MUST BE 3'-0" WITH A 2' DEEP URINAL SCREEN. YOUR DETAIL 3/A6.0 SCALES (AGAIN BECAUSE NO DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED) 30". 8. Verify clearance to the accessible stall in front of the standard stall. Section 604.8.3 calls for a 42" clearance. THE ACCESSIBLE CLEARANCE TO THE ACCESSIBLE TOILET STALL MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 42". YOUR DETAIL 3/A6.O SCALES (DITTO ABOVE) 39". SHEET S1.0 9. OK 10. Please provide structural details and calculations for: a. Heat Pump Fan Coil Unit -OK b. Wall mounted EC Cooler units-NON-COMPLIANT c. Energy Recovery Ventilator-OK d. Water heater-OK NO DETAILS NOR STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY INCONSISTANCIES: A. DETAIL 1/A4.0 NOTE 4 AND DETAILS 2, 3 AND 4/A5.0, NOTE 17, CALLS FOR WALL MOUNTED EC UNITS. B. DETAIL 1/M1.1 NOTE 1 CALLS FOR ROOF MOUNTED EC UNITS AND REFERENCES THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT. IT FURTHER STATES TO REFERENCE DETAIL 14, SHEET M/2.1 (WHICH IS INCLUDED IN ONLY ONE SET OF THE RESUBMITTED DRAWING SETS) WHICH SHOWS A ROOF TOP MOUNTED EC UNIT. THERE ARE NO DETAILS SHOWN FOR THESE UNITS ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND RESUBMIT. 11. OK 12. OK 13. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 14. PLEASE RECONCILE DETAIL NUMBERS 21/A7.0 AND ELEVATION 8/A6.0 SO THEY ARE THE SAME. 15. PLEASE PROVIDE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STAIR AS REQUIRED BY 2006 IBC, ICC-ANSI 117.1, SECTION 505.2 END OF RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| 10/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the envelope energy calculations to correspond to the existing and proposed structures. The building does not have an "attic roof with steel joists", it appears to be a metal building with either lock-seam metal panel or screwed-down metal panels. The building does not appear to have continuous insulation for either the roof or the walls, and cavity insulation is shown only for the walls. No energy calculations are needed for the new office area if the entire building is being shown in the energy calculations. The energy calculation shall be sealed. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the conditioned portion of the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] |
| 10/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/21/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need addressing review- building addition extends north on 2026 E Bilby. plumbing plan does not agree with floor plan |
| 10/21/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Coordinate the drawings with respect to the backwater valve; sheets A1.0 and P1.2 all for the installation of the valve. [Original comment: Provide maintenance access for the backwater valve. Reference: Section 710.6, UPC 2006.] |
| 10/24/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/26/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |