Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM02917
Parcel: 14028008A

Address:
2001 E GANLEY RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM02917
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/19/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/21/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. On sheet A0.0, General Building Summary (Existing Building) enumerated under the BUILDING column is "Addition to Exist Manfu Building" and the actual size is 53,940 s.f. This is confusing as it presents the new addition is this size when in fact on sheet A1.0, the addition is stated as 24,000 s.f. In an effort to confirm the actual size of the addition, building dimensions were researched through out all the sheets of the submitted construction document "Permit Set" and no building dimensions were found.
a. Please provide actual building dimensions on the architectural and structural drawings.
b. Dimensions are shown on the Metal Building Shop Drawings that when calculated provides a total new addition s.f. of 28,800 including the covered loading dock. This is 800 s.f. more than indicated on sheet A1.0. Please provide an accurate square footage summary showing existing building, new addition and covered loading dock. Permit fees and impact fees are based upon the size of the addition.
2. Additionally, the Occupancy Load has been calculated using the 53,940 s.f. number which includes the loading dock. Please recalculate the occupancy load and recalculate your toilet fixture count.
3. Please show the existing building toilet fixtures.
4. Please provide a copy of the last approved site plan.
SHEET A6.0
5. Please provide all required accessible code requirements on the actual toilet plans and elevations.
6. The accessible toilet stall in toilet 101 is not compliant as per ICC/ANSI 11.7, Section 1109.1, 604.8 and your detail 14/A7.
7. The urinal clearance is not compliant as per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Sections 1109.1, 605 and 305.
8. Verify clearance to the accessible stall in front of the standard stall. Section 604.8.3 calls for a 42" clearance
SHEET S1.0
9. Please provide special inspection certifications as S1.0 and S2.0.
10. Please provide structural details and calculations for:
a. Heat Pump Fan Coil Unit
b. Wall mounted EC Cooler units
c. Energy Recovery Ventilator
d. Water heater
11. On Sheet S2.0 there is a detail for a Mezzanine Floor Framing with concrete deck that is not show on the architectural drawings.
a. Please provide structural calculations for this framing plan.
b. Please show floor plan on architectural drawings along with guards (Section 1013) and posted maxium weight signs. A wall section might be nice.
12. Please provide a written rensponse.
13. Depending on how the above comments are addressed addition comments may be forth coming.
END OF REVIEW
09/21/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Building plan will be approved after final CDRC approval of the related Development Plan Package (D11-0020).

Building plan can be approved at the counter as a walk thru once the Final DP Package is available either online or as a hard copy from the applicant.
09/28/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the submitted water pressure calculations using the minimum daily water pressure. Reference: Section A3.3, UPC 2006.
2. The branch piping sizes called out for the urinal flush valves will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS (1 GPF in 4 seconds is approximately 15 GPM). Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
3. Provide maintenance access for the backwater valve. Reference: Section 710.6, UPC 2006.
09/28/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the conditioned portion of the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Provide specifications for the louvers identified by keynote 7 on sheet M1.2. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
3. Clarify the mechanical floor plan on sheet M1.2; both louvers appear to be used as intakes for the A/C system. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.
4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
09/28/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Provide the total water demand that is to be served by the existing water meter. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
09/30/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM02917, 2001 E GanleyRd,
Caid Industries,
Addition of Metal Bldg, Manufacturing

1. Sheet E4.0 describes the Fault Current calculations
conserning the new SES and the feeder to new Panel DP1, however there is no mention regarding the existing Panel feeders being re-fed from the new SES. Describe type of Fault Current protection to be used at overcurrent location at SES for existing Panels.
2. Sheet E4.0 concerning the equipment grounding conductors routed from the 150 kva transformers to the 120/208v panels, 2005 NEC 250.102 (C),the size should be 1/0 cu, since they are on the supply side of overcurrent protection.

Ray Majuta,
Elect Pln Review,
PDSD, City of Tucson,
10/3/2011
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
10/04/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need addressing review- building addition extends north on 2026 E Bilby.
need to show location/method of connection to public sewer
10/06/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied Provide a dimensioned set of plans in order to complete review. Zoning cannot approve until all other reviewers have approved this set of plans.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/11/2011 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed