Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM02898
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewed the building plans to ensure compliance with the approved development plan D11-0005. While the building plans are in compliance with approved development plan as it relates to zoning purview, zoning cannot approve the plans at this time. Once the plans have been reviewed approved by commercial plans reviewers zoning will also approve and stamp the building plans. |
| 09/20/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide structural calculations for the wall mounted water heater bracket shown on details 1/A6 and 9/A9. a. Please provide plumbing specifications for this water heater. It is not shown in the plumbing drawings. T11CM02898 STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW 2. SHEETS S1 AND S3: PROVIDE A NORTH ARROW ON THE PLANS. 3. SHEET S2; DETAIL 10: PROVIDE A NOTE FOR THE LOCATION OF TWO ROWS OF HSA'S ON THE MC12X10.6. 4. SHEETS S2 AND S2.2: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE CMU WALL REINFORCEMENT DIAGRAM. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE (3/S4 FOR THE REINFORCEMENT DIAGRAM, 6/S4 FOR THE REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE) FOR THESE ON THE DETAILS. 5. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: AT SEVERAL LOCATIONS, MECHANICAL UNITS AND THEIR SIZES (10 TON, 30 TON, ETC.) ARE LOCATED ON THE PLAN. FOR STRUCTURAL PURPOSES, LIST THE ACTUAL OPERATING WEIGHTS OF THE UNITS ON THE PLAN, OR REFERENCE THE NOTE THAT APPLIES TO THIS (3/S4.1). 6. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID G.4 FOR THE 54 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 7. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID 7 FOR THE 24 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 8. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID C.7 FOR THE 21 KIP OR 17 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 9. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID 3 FOR THE 112 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 10. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID D.2 FOR THE 14 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 11. SHEET S3; FRAMING PLAN: PROVIDE A NOTE ALONG GRID C.9 FOR THE 3 KIP COMPRESSIVE/TENSILE FORCE (SIMILAR TO THE BOXED NOTE ON GRID C). 12. SHEET S3; SHEET NOTES: SHOULD A NOTE BE ADDED INDICATING A CONCENTRATED LOAD ON THE JOISTS AT THE EXHAUSE HOODS EFH1 AND EFH2? VERIFY. 13. SHEETS S5 AND S5.1: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE EMBED SCHEDULE, DIAPHRAGM DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE, AND THE CMU WALL REINFORCEMENT DIAGRAM. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE FOR THESE ON THE DETAILS. 14. SHEET S5.2: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE EMBED SCHEDULE AND THE DIAPHRAGM DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE FOR THESE ON THE DETAILS. 15. SHEET S6.1: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE DIAPHRAGM DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE FOR THESE ON THE DETAILS. 16. SHEETS S6.2 AND S6.3: SEVERAL DETAILS INDICATE TO REFERENCE THE EMBED SCHEDULE, DIAPHRAGM DIAGRAM AND SCHEDULE, AND THE CMU WALL REINFORCEMENT DIAGRAM. PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC SHEET REFERENCE FOR THESE ON THE DETAILS. 17. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGES 88 THROUGH 98: IS THIS THE EXTENT OF THE BEAM, JOIST, AND GIRDER DESIGNS? PROVIDE A KEY PLAN IN THE CALCULATIONS TO LOCATE THE ROOF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. 18. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/20/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02898 3435 E Broadway Walmart 1. Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget Calculations as required per City of Tucson Commercial Submittals. 2. Provide information sheets on EDC1 and EDC2 Electrical units. 3. Provide information sheets on Hybrid House Units DTA and DTB .( Electrical Spec's) Ray T Majuta, PDSD, City of Tucson, 9/28/2011, Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/27/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The architectural detail 1/A6 (Office Plan) calls for a water heater mounted over the service sink; coordinate with the plumbing drawings. 2. Slope the restroom floors toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Provide the basis for sizing the drainage system for the evaporative condensers and show that the size of the indirect waste receptor (SS1) is adequate to accommodate the expected flow without splashing, flooding, or overloading the drain from the indirect waste receptor. Reference: Sections 702.0 and 703.0, UPC 2006. 5. Provide upper terminal cleanouts on horizontal drainage pipes exceeding 5 feet in length (horizontal drain lines serving sinks and urinals require cleanouts regardless of length). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 6. Provide additional cleanouts in drainage pipe exceeding 100-feet in developed length. Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006. 7. An approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings as shown in detail 3/GP-1. Reference: Sections 707.4 and 707.6, UPC 2006. 8. Provide direct waste connections for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sinks, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartments only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 9. Provide an accessible cleanout in each vent of a combination waste and vent system. Reference: Section 910.6, UPC 2006. 10. Siphonic roof drainage is an engineered system that requires the submission of an Appeal to the Building Official under Section 301.2, UPC 2006, Alternate Materials and Methods of Construction Equivalency. Submit the calculations, upon which the design is based, for review by the Building Official. Include in the calculations the structural requirements for the effect of the roof ponding. 11. Provide a cleanout at the base of each roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. 12. Provide natural gas pipe sizing calculations. Include gas pressures and developed pipe lengths on plans. Reference: Section 1217.0, UPC 2006. 13. Clarify the total connected load for the natural gas system; sheet P1 indicates a total load of 7399 CFH but only 7269 CFH is identified on sheet M1. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 14. Clarify why gas piping is shown being delivered to RTU-16 on sheet M1 when it has no gas heating capability. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 15. Verify the size of the gas main running up the side of the building from the gas meter; it is shown as 2" on sheet M1 and 3" on sheet P1. In addition, on sheet M1, the 2" gas line appears to increase in size from 2" to 2-1/2" once the line penetrates the side of the building just below the roof. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 09/27/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Revise the size of the condensate drains in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Show all the pipe sizes on the drawing. Note that the minimum pipe size for a condensate drain is ¾" or the size of the drain pan connection, whichever is larger. 3. Clarify the information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans, EF2 and EF3. Ensure that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted while the building is occupied. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. 4. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 5. Provide structural details to show how the kitchen hoods are to be supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006 (includes the weight of one person working on each hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 6. Revise the size of the grease ducts to provide a minimum velocity of 1500 feet per minute (Type I hood). Reference: Section 506.3.4, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 7. Provide justification for the use of a Type II hood over the gas-fired bakery oven. Reference: Section 507.2, IMC 2006. 8. Clarify the notes for the deli rotisserie hood, EH-1, in the Exhaust Hood System Schedule on sheet GM1. The schedule calls out notes E and F as being applicable but they appear to be mutually exclusive. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
| 09/27/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/03/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need PCRWRD reivew of location/method of connection to public sewer- Chad Amateau- 740-6547 need copy of on-site private sewer plan U-1 & u-2 for base map update need PCRWRD capacity evaluation- Kurt Stemm- 740-6607 need WW/IWC reivew of grease interceptor- Tom Tomchak- 443-6200 - 5025 W Ina rd need wastewater 5th floor credit evaluation for demo of Macy's - 740-6602 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/08/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |