Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM02883
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/08/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Repair facilities shall be calculated as Ordinary Hazard, Group II |
| 09/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | Reference building-commercial folder for ADAAG comments |
| 09/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. As per the 2006 IBC, Section 1018.2 and Table 1019.2, storage building are occupiable structures and require one exterior door that meets the requirements of Section 1008.1.1. T11CM02883 STREET CAR WASH BAY AND STORAGE BUILDING STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS 2. SHEET S2.1.5; ROOF FRAMING PLANS: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE WASH CANOPY OR MAINTENANCE SHED FRAMING PLANS. VERIFY AND PROVIDE. 3. SHEET S2.1.5 (FRAMING PLAN 3); SHEET S2.1.7 (FOUNDATION PLAN): THE FRAMING PLAN INDICATES COLUMNS TO THE EAST OF THE BUILDING TO BE PT #220 AND #221, WHILE THE FOUNDATION PLAN INDICATES THEY ARE PT #222 AND #223. CLARIFY. 4. SHEET S2.1.5; FRAMING PLAN 1: REVISE THE BUILDING SCALE. 5. SHEET S2.1.7; FOUNDATION PLAN: STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THE WASH CANOPY OR MAINTENANCE SHED FOUNDATION PLANS. VERIFY AND PROVIDE. 6. SHEET S2.1.7; FOUNDATION PLAN: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE COLUMN DESIGN AND THE GRADE BEAM DESIGN SUPPORTING C2. 7. SHEET S2.1.7 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.3 (DETAIL 2): THE DETAIL INDICATES TO SEE THE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR THE FOOTING WIDTH (EXISTING), BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THAT WIDTH. REMOVE THE NOTE OR CLARIFY. 8. SHEET S2.1.7; FOUNDATION PLAN: REVISE THE BUILDING SCALE. 9. SHEET S2.1.7 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.3 (DETAIL 4): THE DETAIL INDICATES THE PIER IS 2'-0" LONG, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A LONGER PIER (NOT DIMENSIONED). CLARIFY. 10. SHEET S5.3; DETAIL 20: GIVE THE SPECIFIC ARCHITECTURAL SHEET REFERENCE FOR THE TOP OF THE CURVED WALL IN THE NOTE. 11. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE (BUILDING OFFICIAL) BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 12. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/09/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/13/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SEE COMMENTS ON T11CM02699 |
| 09/13/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SEE COMMENTS ON T11CM02699 |
| 09/13/2011 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Floodplain use permit required. |
| 09/13/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | SEE COMMENTS ON T11CM02699 |
| 09/13/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | SEE COMMENTS ON T11CM02699 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/07/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/07/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |