Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM02851
Parcel: 12809016D

Address:
4701 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM02851
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/24/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/27/2011 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied 10/27/2011

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
10/27/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM03342
4701 E 22nd ST
New Circle K

1. As per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements, minimum text size for plans is 3/32". especially Sheets E1.2, E5.1, and E7.0.

Raqy T Majuta
Elect Pln Review
PDSD, CoT,
10/30/11
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
10/31/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Please provide special inspection Certifications
2. Please provide an approved site development plan
3. For the purposes of assessing additional plan review fees, please provide a letter summarizing all the deferred submittal items to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose.
SHEET A1.8
4. With exception of the vertical grab bar shown on the side toilet elevation, most all of your toilet elevation mounting details are based upon ADAAG 1994 or a mixture of ADAAG and ANSI. The 2006 IBC uses Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition for all accessibility requitrements.
5. Please provide all accessibile code requirements on the actual designed toilet elevations and comply with the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. Please include all dimensions, accessories, fixtures and clearances.
SHEET A1.2
6. Please provide 1 hour fire rated corridor partitions to match your fire rated doors at hallway 11.
7. At sheets A1.2 and 1.3, revise gerneral note 5, no such detail.
8. Note 38, revise detail to 3/A9.4
9. Note 20, revise detail to 3/A1.7
SHEET A/1.6
10. Revise the detail to 4/A9.5
SHEET A1.7
11. Detail references for 5/A7.1 and 2/A7.1, there is no sheet A7.1. Please rectify.
SHEET A/3.1
12. Please change all ADAAG references to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition.
SHEET A/5.2
13. Key note 20 references to wrong detail, please correct.
SHEET A/8.2
14. Detail 12 is for metal stud construction, this building is wood framed.
SHEET A/9.4
15. At Detail 3:
a. Please provide connections detail to roof trusses including all connections, on center spacing size, quantity/spacing and connection to roof trusses.
b. Call out floor joist and connection detail to their supports.
c. Provide ledger connection anchor to wall.
16. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN AND AT DETAIL 211/S5.1: AT THE ENTRY AREA, PLAN AND DETAIL INDICATE A SHADED AREA FOR PARAPET BRACING. PROVIDE THE DISTANCE THIS BRACING EXTENDS ON THE ROOF.
17. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 108); SHEET P1.3 (DETAIL 1): DIFFERENT DETAILS ARE INDICATED FOR THE WATER HEATER SUPPORT. COORDINATE AS REQUIRED AND PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS.
18. SHEET S4.1; VARIOUS DETAILS: HOW WIDE IS THE STEM WALL? PROVIDE.
19. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 106); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET M5): THE FOOTING SIZE AND REINFORCING INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY.
20. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
END OF REVIEW
11/02/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
11/07/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Sheet G1.0 indicates that this building was designed using both the 2006 International Plumbing Code and the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code; the Plumbing Specifications on sheet P1.3 call for the Arizona State Plumbing Code. These codes are not compatible with each other and only one of the codes should be used. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC.
2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch high. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006.
3. Coordinate the location of the entry point for the water service to the building; sheets C3.1 and P1.1 show different entry locations. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Clarify the proposed design for the mounting shelf for the water heater. The design shown in detail 1/A9.4 is completely different from that shown in detail 1/P1.3. Provide structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
5. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for the water connection to each appliance (note #1, sheet P1.2). Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
6. Revise the size of the under-floor portion of the vents for the floor sinks located in the equipment room and in the sales floor area; the size of that portion of the vent shall comply with the cleanout size requirements of Table 7-6, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006.
7. Revise detail 4/P1.3; an approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings. Reference: Sections 707.4 and 707.6, UPC 2006.
8. Provide an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment of the 3-compartment sink, with a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.
9. Provide a downstream cleanout for the hydromechanical grease interceptor. Reference: Section 707.8, UPC 2006.
10. Provide additional cleanouts in drainage pipe exceeding 100-feet in developed length (see the building sewer on sheet C3.1). Reference: Section 707.4, UPC 2006.
11. Each fixture that is connected to a hydromechanical grease interceptor requires a flow control device unless the grease interceptor is equipped with an integral flow control device. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006.
12. The flow control device for the hydromechanical grease interceptor shall be located in a readily accessible and visible location. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006.
13. No system vent shall be located between a flow control device and a hydromechanical grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006.
11/07/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Revise the size of the condensate drains for the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer evaporators in accordance with Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson (i.e. "When two or more units are tied together, the minimum drain size shall be 1".").
11/07/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
11/17/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied NEED WASTEWATER REVIEW OF LOCATION OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - CHAD AMATEAU - 1ST FLOOR 740-6547
NEED WW/IWC REVIEW 7 APPROVAL OF GREASE TRAP - TOM TOMCHAK 5025 W INA RD 443-6200
NEED 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR DEMO OF EXSISTING BLDG. 740-6602 OR 740-6606

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/30/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/30/2011 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed