Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM02851
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2011 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/07/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T11CM02851 4701 E. 22nd St. Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 09/09/11 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project appears to require a lot split with the adjoining property to the east. Because of the changes required to the parcel to the east, this site plan cannot be approved until the lot split has been approved by the City of Tucson. 2. DS 2-02.2.1.A.8 The parking spaces along the sidewalk where the sidewalk is indicated as 5' in width will require wheel stop curbing or change the sidewalk to a width of 6'-6". 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.9 Provide a detail of the short term bicycle rack and the long term bicycle locker. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.9.3.B.1 Short-term bicycle parking shall be within fifty (50) feet of each public entrance to a building as measured along the most direct pedestrian route (see illustration). The plan indicates 49' to the edge of the bicycle parking spaces. Clearly indicate the location of the long term bicycle parking spaces. 4. DS 2-02.2.1.A.19 Provide dimensions for the future right of way along Swan Road. Dimension the future curb location from the future right of way for both streets. 5. DS 2-02.2.1.A.20 The indicated 3' drainage easement on the property to the north cannot be abandoned on some one else's property. Abandonment can only be for the property indicated. Provide recording sequence numbers for all easements which are to be abandoned. 6. In general note #5, this site is located in a developing area not an established area. Revise 7. In general note #8, revise the parking calc. indicated as "two" hundred to " three" hundred. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T11CM02851.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 09/13/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C3.1 At the Accessible Parking Space detail (Not Numbered) 1. As per ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406, there must be a 3' deep landing clear space at the top of the ramp. Your detail about 1'0" clear from the top of the ramp to the edge of the open door. Please redesign and resubmit with a 3' clear landing. 2. What does the 5.5' dimension refer to? 3. The accessible parking signs must be on the center line of the 8' wide parking space as per DOT requirements. 4. Change note 4 to read as per "ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 EDITION, SECTION 406. The COT DTL 207 is strictly for right of way accessible regulations not private. 5. Show all accessible parking code requirements as per ICC/ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition, Section 502. Provide all required dimensions, markings, aisles, slopes and accessible route access. 6. Show all curb ramp code requirements as per ICC/ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition, Section 406. Provide all required dimensions, slopes, clearances and landings. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/21/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | September 26, 2011 T11CM02851/T11BU01141 Site and Grading Circle K at Swan and 22nd The site and grading plans are not approved as submitted. Please address the following 1. Confirm the project description in the drainage report. Also check the general comments on the plan sheets for typos and artifacts from other projects. 2. The drainage report doesn't seem to take the storm drain system in 22nd Street. Provide discussion of how the storm drains affect the project site. According to the GIS map, a storm drain in 22nd street collects street flows Rosemont Avenue and discharges into wash A. 3. The maximum driveway width at the property line is 30 feet.. Revise the site plan accordingly. ( City Code 25-39) 4. Provide clarification with additional slope indicators to demonstrate onsite watersheds will be directed to the water harvesting areas as indicated on the water harvesting plan. 5. Clearly label all curb radii. Demonstrate the curb returns have a 25-foot radius in accordance with the Transportation access management guidelines. 6. The PDSD GIS map shows storm drain catch basins in the right of way adjacent to the project site. Revise the SWPPP to address control of fugitive sediment relative to the catch basins. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate Loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/28/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/04/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 30" screen is required along 22nd Ave and Swan Rd per LUC 3.7 2-I. Identify screening elements on the site, grading and landscape plans 2. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Provide dimensions for planter adjacent to proposed building on the grading and landscape plans. 3. Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed and revisions are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 10/04/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/20/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |