Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM02719
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Unable to locate response letter to Fire Department comments on first submittal. Comments repeated below. Need a site utility plan. Unable to determine how sprinkler pipe gets to pump room. Can not run under slab. Unable to locate test header for fire pump. Not sure what a wall mounted roof hydrant is. Clarify. Unable to determine Fire Department Connection location. Please convert number of cylinders of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide into quantities at normal pressure so I can refer to numbers in table of maximum allowable quantities in the IFC. Also, could not find any quantities for oxygen. Verify med gas room is rated. First and second floor areas exceed 52,000 sq. ft. This requires two risers per floor. Should be shown as part as conceptual sprinkler plans. |
| 10/12/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02719 TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING ADDITION SHELL BUILDING SECOND REVIEW 1. PREVIOUS NOTE 9; SHEET S305: NOTE 'A' HAS NOT BEEN REVISED ON THIS SHEET. IS IT PERTINENT? REMOVE OR REVISE. 2. SHEET S-601; DETAIL 21: PROVIDE THE TOP OF STEEL ELEVATION FOR THE LOW BEAM. 3. SHEET S-601; DETAILS 23 AND 24: CLEAR UP THE VERBIAGE AND THE DETAILS. 4. PREVIOUS NOTE 37: DEMOLITION WITHIN THE EXISTING BUILDING HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION OF THIS PROJECT. ARE THE SHEETS D-110, D-111, AND D-120 TO BE INCLUDED UNDER THIS SHELL PERMIT? A NOTE ON SHEET D-111 WAS REMOVED CONCERNING EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR DEMOLITION WORK BEING A PART OF OTHER BID PACKAGES, BUT THAT SAME NOTE REMAINS ON SHEET D-120. IF ANY DEMOLITION IS TO BE PERFORMED ON ANY EXISTING BUILDING UNDER THIS PERMIT NUMBER, PROVIDE VALUATION FOR THAT WORK. 5. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies for the water service to the building are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Provide an agreement from Tucson Water stating that the location shown on sheet P-112.1 is acceptable to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 10/20/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide the size of the drain lines for the water service reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies shown in detail 7/P-502. Reference: Sections 310.4 and 603.3.9, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. The minimum residual water pressure is 15 PSI. Note that some water closets and some appliances (e.g. Haws emergency eyewashes and showers, and Oasis drinking fountains) require minimum residual pressures greater than 15 PSI. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Comment not addressed. Verify that the floor drain referenced in detail 1/P-503 is capable of receiving the discharge of the vacuum pump tank drain without splashing or flooding. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006. 5. Comment not addressed. Show that the relief valve, water solenoid valve, and the heater drain for each of the steam heat exchangers are indirectly-connected to the sanitary drain system such that no steam or liquids over 140 degrees Fahrenheit discharge directly into the drainage system, in compliance with the requirements of Section 810.1, UPC 2006. 6. Comment not resolved. Revise the roof drain sizing based on a storm of 60-minutes duration and a 100-year return period, i.e. 3" per hour. Reference: Section 1101.11.1 and Table 11-1, UPC 2006. [Original comment: Provide calculations to show how the roof drains and horizontal rainwater pipes were sized. Include the effect of side walls draining onto the roof. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.4, UPC 2006.] |
| 10/25/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide drawings M000 (Legends & Symbols) and M142.1 (Area B - Fourth Floor Plan - HVAC Duct). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Comment not addressed. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. |
| 10/27/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02719 5301 E Grant Rd New Wing at TMC Electrical plans denied for following: Item 2 from last review requesting Fault Current Calculations for Distribution Equipment not submitted, (please place on Electrical Plans rather than submit seperately). Item 3 last review requesting a short description of how the installation as a whole complies with NEC 2005 517.17 not submitted. Item 4 last review requesting a specification sheet on Fire Pump Controller not submitted. The following Panels cannot be found in the Panel Schedule Sheets or Riser Diagrams, however they can be found in the Power Plan Sheets, Panels--S2PH,S2PG, S2PB,S3PG,and S3PH. The following Panels cannot be found in the Power Plan Sheets, or the Panel Schedule Sheets, or the Riser Diagrams, Panels---S4LA, S4LLSA, SPHLA, SPHPA, and SPHPEQA. Ray T Majuta Elect Plan Review PDSD, C of Tuc 10/26/11 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/28/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5301 E GRANT RD T11CM02719 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 28, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans appear to meet the requirements of the Development Package. Zoning will stamp and approve the building plan once all other PDSD agencies have approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\bldg\t11cm02719.doc |
| 10/31/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/05/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |