Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM02719
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Need a site utility plan. Unable to determine how sprinkler pipe gets to pump room. Can not run under slab. Unable to locate test header for fire pump. Not sure what a wall mounted roof hydrant is. Clarify. Unable to determine Fire Department Connection location. Please convert number of cylinders of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide into quantities at normal pressure so I can refer to numbers in table of maximum allowable quantities in the IFC. Also, could not find any quantities for oxygen. Verify med gas room is rated. First and second floor areas exceed 52,000 sq. ft. This requires two risers per floor. Should be shown as part as conceptual sprinkler plans. |
| 09/07/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies for the water service to the building are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Provide an agreement from Tucson Water stating that the location shown on sheet P-112.1 is acceptable to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 09/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide drawings M000 (Legends & Symbols) and M142.1 (Area B - Fourth Floor Plan - HVAC Duct). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 3. Provide the installed weight of the mechanical equipment. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 4. Show how the fan coils are being connected to the building structure and provide calculations to show that the building structure is not being adversely affected. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
| 09/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the size of the drain lines for the water service reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies shown in detail 7/P-502. Reference: Sections 310.4 and 603.3.9, UPC 2006. 2. The minimum residual water pressure is 15 PSI. Note that some water closets and some appliances (e.g. Haws emergency eyewashes and showers, and Oasis drinking fountains) require minimum residual pressures greater than 15 PSI. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 3. Provide water pressure and water pipe sizing calculations. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006. 4. Revise detail 4/P-502 to provide an indirect connection using an airgap rather than an airbreak. Reference: Section 801.5, UPC 2006. 5. Verify that the floor drain referenced in detail 1/P-503 is capable of receiving the discharge of the vacuum pump tank drain without splashing or flooding. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006. 6. Indirect waste receptors shall not be installed in a closet or cupboard (see detail 2/P-503). Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006. 7. Show that the relief valve, water solenoid valve, and the heater drain for each of the steam heat exchangers are indirectly-connected to the sanitary drain system such that no steam or liquids over 140 degrees Fahrenheit discharge directly into the drainage system, in compliance with the requirements of Section 810.1, UPC 2006. 8. Provide calculations to show how the roof drains and horizontal rainwater pipes were sized. Include the effect of side walls draining onto the roof. Reference: Sections 1101.11 and 1106.4, UPC 2006. |
| 09/09/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02719 TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER WEST WING ADDITION SHELL BUILDING REVIEW 1. SHEET S-202; EC ENTRANCE FOUNDATION PLAN: WHY IS THIS PLAN INCLUDED IN THIS REVIEW SET? REMOVE IF IT IS NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT. 2. SHEET SD-200; FOUNDATION DEMOLITION PLAN: CLARIFY ON THIS SHEET WHAT IS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND WHAT IS TO REMAIN. IS 'TBR' TO BE REMOVED. ADD A PLAN NOTE. 3. SHEETS S-300, S-302, S-304, AND S-306; FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE FRAMING AROUND THE SLAB OPENINGS (ON THE PLAN, OR REFERENCE A NOTE). FOR THIS SUBMITTAL, MECHANICAL WEIGHTS SHOULD BE DETERMINED, ALLOWING FOR A FRAMING DESIGN. 4. SHEETS S-300, S-301, S-302, S-303, S-304, S-305, S-306, S-307, S-308, SD-301, S-600, AND S-603: WHY ARE THERE CLOUDED REVISIONS ON THESE SHEETS? THIS IS THE INITIAL REVIEW. 5. SHEET S-300; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ON GRID LINE 5, JUST WEST OF GRID LINE K, REFERENCES A SEAT ON THE COLUMN. VERIFY THIS NOTE. 6. SHEETS S-300, S-302, AND S-304; FRAMING PLAN: IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THESE PLANS, THERE IS A SYMBOL INDICATING AN ELEVATION 2 ON SHEET S-700. SHOULD THIS BE E? WHAT IS THE REFERENCE TO ELEVATION 4-a? 7. SHEET S-301; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE JUST ABOVE GRID LINE 6 INDICATES AN ANGLE 3X2X3/16 'X'-BRIDGING BETWEEN BEAMS. SHOW THESE ANGLES ON SECTION 1/S-603, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 8. SHEET S-301; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE EAST OF GRID LINE M AND NORTH OF GRID LINE 5 INDICATES A SLIP CONNECTION FOR AN EXISTING W18 BEAM TO A NEW COLUMN. PROVIDE A DETAIL, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 9. SHEETS S-301, S-303, S-305, S-307, AND S-308: IS NOTE 'A' PERTINENT TO THESE SHEETS? VERIFY. 10. SHEET S-302; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES 20/S-601. THERE IS NO DETAIL 20 ON SHEET S-601. CLARIFY. 11. SHEET S-303; FRAMING PLAN: ADD A NOTE TO THE SHADED AREA BETWEEN GRID LINES 5 AND 7 AND GRID LINES K AND K.8 IN REFERENCE TO THE CONCRETE SLAB. 12. SHEET S-303; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ABOVE GRID LINE 5 INDICATES AN ANGLE 3X2X3/16 'X'-BRIDGING BETWEEN BEAMS. SHOW THESE ANGLES ON SECTION 12/S-601, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 13. SHEET S-304; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE NEAR GRID LINE J AND GRID LINE 6 INDICATES AN ANGLE 4X3X1/4 FRAME BETWEEN BEAMS. SHOW THESE ON A SECTION, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 14. SHEET S-306; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ABOVE GRID LINE 5 INDICATES AN ANGLE 3X2X3/16 'X'-BRIDGING BETWEEN BEAMS. SHOW THESE ANGLES ON SECTION 14/S-601, OR REFERENCE A DETAIL. 15. SHEET S-306; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ABOVE GRID LINE 2 AND WEST OF GRID LINE K REFERENCES A DETAIL 9/S-600. THERE IS NO DETAIL 9 ON SHEET S-600. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET S-306; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT AT THE NORTH WALL INDICATES 20/S-601. THERE IS NO DETAIL 20 ON SHEET S-601. CLARIFY. 17. SHEET S-307; FRAMING PLAN: A NOTE ABOVE GRID LINE 4 AND GRID LINE 2 AND WEST OF GRID LINE K REFERENCES A DETAIL 9/S-600. THERE IS NO DETAIL 9 ON SHEET S-600. CLARIFY. 18. SHEET S-307; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL CUT AT THE SOUTH WALL INDICATES 22/S-601. THERE IS NO DETAIL 22 ON SHEET S-601. CLARIFY. 19. SHEET S-308; SECTION 1: SOME OF THE NOTES NEED TO BE DARKENED. 20. SHEET S-309; FRAMING PLAN: WHY IS THIS PLAN INCLUDED IN THES REVIEW SET? REMOVE IF NOT IN THIS PROJECT. 21. SHEET SD-301; DEMOLITION PLAN: CLARIFY ON THIS SHEET WHAT IS TO BE DEMOLISHED AND WHAT IS TO REMAIN. IS 'TBR' TO BE REMOVED? ADD A PLAN NOTE. 22. SHEET SD-301; DEMOLITION PLAN: ON GRID LINE 1 JUST BELOW GRID LINE E, REVISE THE SECTION CUT 2/SD-301 TO MATCH OTHER SECTION CUTS. 23. SHEET SD-301; DEMOLITION PLAN: A NOTE BELOW GRID LINE D ON GRID LINE 2 INDICATES TO SEE A DETAIL WHERE THE NEW W14X22 IS BELOW AN EXISTING BEAM. SPECIFY WHICH DETAIL. 24. SHEET SD-301; DEMOLITION PLAN: A NOTE BELOW GRID LINE B ON GRID LINE 2 INDICATES TO CONNECT A W14 TO THE BOTTOM OF AN EXISTING W12. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR REFERENCE TO A DETAIL. 25. SHEET SD-301; DEMOLITION PLAN: A NOTE BELOW GRID LINE A AND WEST OF GRID LINE 1 INDICATES TO CONNECT AN EXISTING W18X55 TO A NEW COLUMN WITH A SLIP CONNECTION. PROVIDE A DETAIL OR REFERENCE TO A DETAIL. 26. SHEET SD-303; DEMOLITION PLAN: ON GRID LINE 1 JUST BELOW GRID LINE E, REVISE THE SECTION CUT 1/SD-301 TO MATCH OTHER SECTION CUTS. 27. SHEET SD-303; DEMOLITION PLAN: MATCH THE GRID LINE INDICATORS (4 SIDED) FROM GRID LINES F TO G.4 AND GRID LINES .08 TO 1.8 TO MATCH THE TYPICAL INDICATORS (6 SIDED). 28. SHEET SD-303; DEMOLITION PLAN: INDICATE ON THE PLAN ALL STEEL JOISTS ARE EXISTING. 29. SHEET S-600; DETAIL 1: INDICATE THE WELD REQUIRED FOR THE BENT PLATE TO THE BEAM AND THE STIFFENER PLATE TO THE BEAM, OR REFERENCE A NOTE OR DETAIL. 30. SHEET S-602; LINTEL SCHEDULE: IS THIS SCHEDULE REQUIRED? 31. SHEET S-700; FRAMING PLAN B: THE TRELLIS ELEVATION REFERENCE SHOULD BE C. VERIFY. WHAT IS THE REFERENCE TO ELEVATION 4-a? 32. SHEET S-700; FRAMING PLAN D: THE TRELLIS ELEVATION REFERENCE SHOULD BE E. VERIFY. WHAT IS THE REFERENCE TO ELEVATION 5-a? 33. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE KEY PLANS IN THE CALCULATIONS, INDICATING THE COLUMN REFERENCE ID NUMBER FOR ALL COLUMNS. PROVIDE A SUMMARY LISTING OF ALL THE COLUMN REFERENCE NUMBERS ALONG WITH THE RESPECTIVE SIZES FOR EACH BUILDING LEVEL. 34. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE KEY PLANS IN THE CALCULATIONS, INDICATING THE BEAM REFERENCE ID NUMBER FOR ALL BEAMS. PROVIDE A SUMMARY LISTING OF ALL THE BEAM REFERENCE NUMBERS ALONG WITH THE RESPECTIVE SIZES FOR EACH BUILDING LEVEL. 35. GENERAL: PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. 36. GENERAL: THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS DO NOT FOLLOW THE ORDER LISTED IN THE SHEET INDEX ON G-001. CLARIFY. 37. GENERAL: DEMOLITION WITHIN THE EXISTING BUILDING HAS NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS PROJECT IS FOR THE NEW WEST WING SHELL STRUCTURE ONLY. PROVIDE A VALUATION FOR ALL DEMOLITION WORK WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS, AND IT WILL BE INCLUDED UNDER THIS PERMIT. 38. GENERAL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. SOME PLAN NOTES AND DETAIL NOTES DO NOT MEET THAT STANDARD. REVISE. 39. GENERAL: PROVIDE THE SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS REQUIRED TO ENSURE ALL SPECIAL INSPECTORS ARE CERTIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. 40. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/13/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to permit T11CM01448 FIRST |
| 09/19/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02719 5301 E Grant Rd,Tucson Az. West Wing Addition to TMC Provide following information in order to complete review: 1. It is my understanding that these plans are submitted in order to obtain a permit for the shell building of the West Wing. This is to include all electrical equipment concerning the distribution system for the shell. In review of the plans I find a complete one line diagram showing the distribution begining on Sheet E1201.1 thur E1205.1, and some locations on E315.1 1st floor Electrical Room. The one line diagram shown on Sheets E1200.1, E1201.1, E1202.1, E1203.1, E1204.1 and El205.1 appears to be complete, however not all equipment is shown on the electrical floor plans. All Switchgear Distribution Centers, transformers, panels, UPS, Imaging, and other electrical equipment are required to be shown for location. Please provide a floor by floor plan showing all electrical equipment shown on the one line diagram. Commercial Submittal Requirements for the City of Tucson request the following on the floor plans: A. Location of all outlets, fixtures, switches, appliances, panels, motors, disconnects, electrical equipment and service. B. Assign circuit and feeder identification to electrical equipment along with conductor and conduit requirements. The floor plans also allows for the reviewer to check clearances about electrical equipment. 2. Provide a fault current anyslis for electrical equipment. 3. Provide a short detailed discription of how the service complies with 2005 NEC 517.17 , with existing and new service and feeders. 4. Sheet E315.1 shows the Fire Pump location, Sheet E1201.1 shows the feeder and OCP. Provide a specification sheet on the Fire Controller, and indicate on this sheet "Installation to comply with NFPA 20". 5. Sheet E1201.1, ATS-2 used twice, one should be ATS-3. 6. Sheet E1200.1, AST-1 shown feeding Distribution Pnl DR-81LLS with 4 1/0's,6 grd, should be 4 600kcmil's,2grd. 7. Sheet E1202.1, CHWP 1 and 2, HWP 1 and 2, at 77 and 52 amps are fused at 30 and 20 amps. How does the VFD do this ? 8.Sheet E315.1, how will the two 400 amp CB's and the 1200 amp CB's for the transformers have the required clearance in front of them ? 9. Sheet E-315.1, one of the 500 kva transformers should be identified as T-DR83-PB. Please reply to each item listed individually and indicate how addressed. Provide these plans that I have reviewed along with your re-submittal, for my information, I have outlined what I have checked on these. Ray T Majuta, Elect Plan Review,PSDS, City of Tucson, 9/23/2011 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/19/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 5301 E GRANT RD T11CM02719 Site Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 19, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans appear to meet the requirements of the Development Package. Zoning will stamp and approve the building plan once all other PDSD agencies have approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\bldg\t11cm02719.doc |
| 09/21/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Will stamp after all approved. |
| 09/21/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/07/2011 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/07/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |