Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM02699
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO SHOW LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER. NEED RD FLOOR PCRWRD REVIEW OF LOCATION/METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER- CHAD AMATEAU- 740-6547 MAY NEED PUBLIC SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR PUBLIC SEWER ALTERATIONS- YVONNE SUAREZ - 740-6733 NEED PCRWRD 3RD FLOOR CAPACITY REVIEW - KURT STEMM - 740-6534 NEED WASTEWATER IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL - TOM TOMCHAK - 5025 W INA RD - 4436200 |
| 08/29/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/30/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 09/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet (see also sheet M6.0.3; the town of Pima is located in Graham County). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 09/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Show the water and drain piping for fixture P-7 on the riser diagram on sheet P2.1.4. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Show that the restroom floors (rooms 106 and 108) slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 3. Provide specifications to show how the proposed solar water storage tank and the heat exchangers within the tank comply with the requirements for indirect water heaters and protection of the potable water system. Reference: Sections 506.4 and 603.4.4.1, UPC 2006. 4. Specify how the Industrial Cold Water piping and outlets are to be identified. Reference: Section 601.2, UPC 2006. 5. Provide indirect waste piping for the discharges of the reduced pressure backflow preventer located on the mezzanine to an approved indirect waste receptor. Reference: Sections 603.3.7, 603.3.9, and 803.0, UPC 2006. 6. Provide the specifications for the expansion tank for the domestic hot water system, ET-3, as noted on sheet M6.1.2. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 608.3, UPC 2006. 7. Revise the submitted water pressure calculations using the minimum daily water pressure (46 PSI according to sheet C0.1, Private Water Notes). Reference: Section A3.3, UPC 2006. 8. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the pressure drop due to the water meter and to the reduced pressure backflow preventer. Reference: Section 610.2, UPC 2006. 9. The branch piping sizes shown for the flush valve-water closets will result in water velocities greater than 8 FPS (1.6 GPF in 4 seconds = 24 GPM). Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. 10. Verify that the horizontal portions of the plumbing vents do not exceed 1/3 of the total allowable vent length shown in Table 7-5, UPC 2006. 11. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH-8, 2382.27') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2382.90'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 12. Clarify the size of the discharge pipe for the sump pump, SP-1; it is shown as 2" on sheet P2.1.1 but is 3" on sheet P2.1.4. 13. Show the installation of the check valve and the gate (or ball) valve for the sump pump, SP-1. Reference: Section 710.4, UPC 2006. 14. Provide vent piping of sufficient size to comply with Section 904.1, UPC 2006. Vents located upstream from pumps, ejectors, backwater valves, or other devices that obstruct the free flow of gases between the building sewer and the outside atmosphere shall not be used for meeting the required cross-sectional vent area. 15. Clarify how the specified industrial waste interceptor complies with the requirements of Section 1017.1, UPC 2006 which requires the installation of an oil or flammable liquid interceptor. 16. Gravity grease interceptors shall be vented on the sewer side of the interceptor. Reference: Section 1009.4, UPC 2006. 17. Show all of the natural gas-fired equipment served by the natural gas piping system; provide all of the connected loads and the developed lengths from the meter to the gas-fired appliances. If using Table 12-8, UPC 2006, the value in the Length column for the main gas line shall be greater than or equal to the length of pipe from the meter to the furthest gas outlet. Clarify the gas requirements for the ("Single Packaged Air Conditioner Gas/Electric") rooftop unit, RTU-1. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 1209.1.1, and 1209.1.2, UPC 2006. 18. If the manufacturer does not incorporate a sediment trap ("dirt leg") within the gas-fired equipment, provide a sediment trap as close to the equipment (UH-1, UH-2, RTU-1, and EC-2) as possible. Reference: Section 1212.7, UPC 2006. |
| 09/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Needs approved site development plan. 2. Needs Special Inspection Certificates. 3. For the purpose of additional review fee assessment, please provide a letter to the building offical listing all items of deferred submittals. SHEET A1.1 4. Coordinate and update this plan as per the approved site development plan. SHEET A1.1.2 5. Ditto comment 4 for all site details. SHEET A4.1 6. At detail 2: a. Please show all required accessibile toilet requirements as per the 1994 ADAAG: i.e. all dimensions, accessories, fixtures and clearances as per Sections 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, 4.19, 4.21, 4.22 AND 4.23. b. The urinal width is non compliant with Section 4.2.4.2 and Fig 4(e). c. Please show how the 5' diameter turning radii shown in both toilet rooms have the proper height clearance as required by sections 4.2.3, 4.2.4.1 and Fig 3 (a). d. With the waste receptor positioned in front of the shower, the required 36" clearance is not met as per Section 4.21.2 and Fig 35 (a). e. Please provide a shower seat and grab bars as per Sections 4.21 and Fig 35 (a). f. The door to toilet room 109 is non compliant as it swings into the clear space of the water closet, Section 4.22.2. SHEET A5.1 7. Detail 22, not all of these details are compliant with the 1994 ADAAG: a. Water cooler non compliant with Section 4.1.3 (10) (a) b. Lavatory clearance noncompliant with 4.19 and Fig 31 c. For the purpose of accuracy and ADAAG compliance, please delete all these typical details and provide all accessibility requirements directly on the actual designed toilet plan and elevations. Please include all dimensions, accessories and fixtures and clearances. 8. All counter top lavatories are non compliant with required ADAAG clearance as per Section 4.19 and fig 31. SHEET A7.1 9. Detail 6 shows 20 risers @ 7" which equals a total height of 10'-8". Detail 7 shows a floor to floor height of 10'-10". Please reconcile. T11CM02699 STREET CAR MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS 10. SHEET S2.1.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S3.1 (DETAIL 1): THE DETAIL REFERENCES THE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR THE FOOTING WIDTH. THE WALL ON GRID A HAS NO FOOTING MARK. PROVIDE. 11. SHEET S2.1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: IS THE TOP OF THE FOOTING FROM GRID F TO THE NORTH TYPICALLY 96'-6"? INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN. MANY DETAILS REFERENCE THE FOUNDATION PLAN. 12. SHEET S2.1.2; FRAMING PLAN: THERE ARE FOUR BEAMS SOUTH OF GRID H BETWEEN GRIDS 3 AND 7 NOTED AS B6 IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS. THE WEST BEAM IS DENOTED AS A W16X36 (PER THE CALCULATIONS), BUT THE NEXT THREE BEAMS TO THE EAST ARE DENOTED AS W16X26. VERIFY. 13. SHEET S2.1.2; FRAMING PLAN: IS THE TYPICAL DETAIL CUT 17/S5.1 ON GRID F CORRECT? VERIFY. 14. SHEET S2.1.2 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.2 (DETAIL 13): THE DETAIL DOES NOT INDICATE THE W16X31 FRAMING INTO THE COLUMN. VERIFY. 15. SHEET S2.1.3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL 9): THE DETAIL INDICATES 8" OF BEARING AT A W8-W12, AND 12" OF BEARING AT A W18. ON THE PLAN WHERE THIS DETAIL IS CUT (CURVED BEAMS), THERE IS A W16 AND A W21. INDICATE THE BEARING LENGTH ON THE DETAIL FOR THESE BEAMS. CHECK THE MASONRY PIERS (16" WIDTH) FOR ADEQUATE BEARING LENGTH FOR THE BEAMS (WHERE TWO BEAMS ARE BEARING ON ONE PIER). 16. SHEET S2.1.3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S2.1.4 (ELEVATION A): THE FRAMING PLAN KEYNOTE 16 INDICATES A MAN DOOR, BUT THE ELEVATION DOES NOT SHOW IT. VERIFY. 17. SHEET S2.1.3 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL 13): IS THE DETAIL CUT 13/S5.1 (NEAR GRIDS 2 AND F) CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION? IS IT SIMILAR? VERIFY. 18. SHEET S2.1.3; KEYNOTES: IS KEYNOTE 4 INDICATED ON THE PLAN? VERIFY. 19. SHEET S3.1; DETAIL 10: WHAT IS THE 8" DIMENSION FROM THE WALL FACE? EXPLAIN ON THE DETAIL. 20. SHEET S3.2; DETAIL 6: SHOULD THE NUMBER OF DIAGONAL BARS BE NOTED AS 4? VERIFY. 21. SHEET S5.1; DETAILS 1 AND 2: PROVIDE THE LOCATION (ELEVATION) OF WHERE THE WALL CHANGES TO 6" MASONRY. 22. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 09/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | ACCESSIBLE REVIEW TO BE INCLUDED IN BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| 09/12/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02699 290 E 8th ST Street Car Maint Bldg The electrical plans have been denied for the following: 1. Please provide information on the 13.8KW EUSERC Service in the form of a specification sheet. 2. Notate on Sheet E4.1 that the 1200 AMP Service MCS SES will be tested in acordance with 2005 NEC 230.95, and written documentation to be provided to the AHJ . 3. Indicate on Sheet E3.1 that egress doors to electrical equipment rooms to comply with NEC 110.26(C)2. 4. There is not sufficient information to review the OCS System, this system should either be notated on plan that it is to be seperately reviewed under a different permit in the future, or provide sufficient information in order to review. 5. The TPSS Building appears to be a type of Manufactured Building with the equipment already built in, if this is the case would this building be supported by a National Listing or such? Ray Majuta Elect Pln Ck,PDSD< City of Tucson, 9/11/11 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/13/2011 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/13/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Floodplain use permit required. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/30/2011 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/30/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |