Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM02499
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/27/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. MUST be on sealed architectural plans. (State Board of Technical Registration requirement) 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030. 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. FYI, code review analysis is on sheet C0.2, not sheet C1.0 as stated in response letter. |
| 10/27/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Can not approve the building plans for permit without an approved site development plan. 2. Deferred submittal letter is not included with the resubmittal package. 3. Please provide special inspection certifications. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/28/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1900 W SPEEDWAY BL T11CM02499, T11CM02500 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 28, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development plan has been approved by all PDSD agencies. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11cm02499.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: |
| 11/04/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
| 11/07/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. A change in the size of a drainage pipe, for which a larger cleanout is required, must be provided with the required size cleanout. [Original comment: Provide cleanouts sized per Section 707.11, UPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved. Neither detail 4/A4.0 nor sheet P1.2 provides the size of the scuppers. See Section 1101.12.2.1, UPC 2006 for scupper sizing instructions. Again, the "scupper overflow drain" shown in detail 4/A4.0 only provides overflow protection for the collector box, not for the roof and it is also undersized for that purpose. [Original comment: Clarify the arrangement of the scuppers and overflows noted on sheet P1.2 and coordinate with the architectural detail 4/A4.0 (the "scupper overflow drain" shown in detail 4/A4.0 only provides overflow protection for the collector box, not for the roof). Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1101.11.1, and Table 11-1, UPC 2006.] |
| 11/08/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/08/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need 3rd floor PCRWRD review of location/method of connection to public sewer - Chad Amateau- 740-6547 need public sewer manhole tap permit - Yvonne Suarez - 740-6733 need 3rd floor capacity review - Kurt Stemm - 740-6607 need to abandon portion of on-site 6" public sewer need WW/IWC reivew & approval of e/one extreme series pre-packaged triplex grinder pump station model WH483 per utility plan C2.1 - Tom Tomchak - 5025 W Ina rd - 443-6200 need DEQ review & approval of lift station - David Amash - 33 N stone 7th floor - 243-7400 |
| 11/18/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building plans will be reviewed once an approved Development Plan is provided; D11-0026. Verify conformance between the 2 plan sets. |
| 11/29/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/30/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |