Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM02497
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Fire notes: Separate permits are required for tanks and alarms. |
| 10/17/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide special inspection Certifications 2. Please provide an approved site development plan 3. For the purposes of assessing additional plan review fees, please provide a letter summarizing all the deferred submittal items to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose. SHEET A1.8 4. With exception of the vertical grab bar shown on the side toilet elevation, most all of your toilet elevation mounting details are based upon ADAAG 1994 or a mixture of ADAAG and ANSI. The 2006 IBC uses Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition for all accessibility requitrements. 5. Please provide all accessibile code requirements on the actual designed toilet elevations and comply with the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. Please include all dimensions, accessories, fixtures and clearances. SHEET A1.2 6. Please provide 1 hour fire rated corridor partitions to match your fire rated doors at hallway 11. 7. At sheets A1.2 and 1.3, revise gerneral note 5, no such detail. 8. Note 38, revise detail to 3/A9.4 9. Note 20, revise detail to 3/A1.7 SHEET A/1.6 10. Revise the detail to 4/A9.5 SHEET A1.7 11. Detail references for 5/A7.1 and 2/A7.1, there is no sheet A7.1. Please rectify. SHEET A/3.1 12. Please change all ADAAG references to the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC-ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. SHEET A/5.2 13. Key note 20 references to wrong detail, please correct. SHEET A/8.2 14. Detail 12 is for metal stud construction, this building is wood framed. SHEET A/9.4 15. At Detail 3: a. Please provide connections detail to roof trusses including all connections, on center spacing size, quantity/spacing and connection to roof trusses. b. Call out floor joist and connection detail to their supports. c. Provide ledger connection anchor to wall. 16. SHEET S1.3; DETAIL 15: THIS DETAIL IS FOR METAL STUD WALLS. IS IT APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT? REMOVE IF NOT REQUIRED. 17. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE ON THE PLAN THE LOADS AND THEIR LOCATIONS ON THE ROOF TRUSSES OF THE STORAGE LOFT SUPPORTS. 18. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: A DETAIL REFERENCE AT A MECHANICAL UNIT PLATFORM CALLS OUT 221/S5.2. REVISE (NO DETAIL 221/S5.2). 19. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: AT THE ENTRY AREA, PLAN NOTES INDICATE A SHADED AREA FOR PARAPET BRACING. PROVIDE THE DISTANCE THIS BRACING EXTENDS ON THE ROOF. 20. SHEET S3.1; BOXED NOTE: THE THIRD NOTE REFERENCES DETAIL 15/S1.3 FOR FOUNTAIN WALL FRAMING. REVISE THE NOTE. 21. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 108); SHEET P1.3 (DETAIL 1): DIFFERENT DETAILS ARE INDICATED FOR THE WATER HEATER SUPPORT. COORDINATE AS REQUIRED. 22. SHEET S4.1; VARIOUS DETAILS: HOW WIDE IS THE STEM WALL? PROVIDE. 23. SHEET S4.1 (DETAIL 106); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET M5): THE FOOTING SIZE AND REINFORCING INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS DO NOT MATCH THE CALCULATIONS. CLARIFY. 24. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 10/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet G1.0 indicates that this building was designed using both the 2006 International Plumbing Code and the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code; the Plumbing Specifications on sheet P1.3 call for the Arizona State Plumbing Code. These codes are not compatible with each other and only one of the codes should be used. This review has been made using the 2006 UPC. 2. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum of 3/32-inch high. Reference: Section 106.1.1, IBC 2006. 3. Clarify the proposed design for the mounting shelf for the water heater. The design shown in detail 1/A9.4 is completely different from that shown in detail 1/P1.3. Provide structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 4. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for the water connection to each appliance (note #1, sheet P1.2). Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006. 5. Air chambers are not required by the 2006 UPC but pressure-absorbing devices (i.e. water hammer arrestors) are required for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006. 6. Show the size of the under-floor portion of the vents for the floor sinks located in the equipment room and in the sales floor area. The size of that portion of the vent shall comply with the cleanout size requirements of Table 7-6, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006. 7. Revise detail 4/P1.3; an approved 2-way cleanout fitting is a single fitting, not a field-assembled group of individual fittings. Reference: Sections 707.4 and 707.6, UPC 2006. 8. Provide an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment of the 3-compartment sink, with a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 9. Provide a downstream cleanout for the hydromechanical grease interceptor. Reference: Section 707.8, UPC 2006. 10. Each fixture that is connected to a hydromechanical grease interceptor requires a flow control device unless the grease interceptor is equipped with an integral flow control device. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006. 11. The flow control device for the hydromechanical grease interceptor shall be located in a readily accessible and visible location. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006. 12. No system vent shall be located between a flow control device and a hydromechanical grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1014.2.1, UPC 2006. |
| 10/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/27/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM02497 1395 W Miracle Mile 1. As per City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements, minimum text size is 3/32", see Sheets E1.2, E5.1, and E7.0. Ray T Majuta Electrical Plan Review PDSD, CoT, 10/29/11 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov New Circle K |
| 10/31/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 1395 W. Miracle Mile T11CM02497 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved 3. Due to the numerous comments by other PDSD agencies on the building plan Zoning will approve once all other PDSD agencies have approved. 4. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 11/01/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 4" connection to 8" public sewer per C3.1- need PCRWRD review approval - Chad Amateau 740-6547. need 3rd floor PCRWRD capaciity evaluation - Kurt Stemm 740-6607. need WW/IWC review of grease interceptor - 5025 W Ina Rd 443-6200. need WW 5th fl credit evaluation for bldg demo 740-6602 or 740-6606 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/30/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |