Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - T11CM02497
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Circle K @ Miracle Mile & Flowing Wells T11CM02497 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Zoning acknowledges that a lot split and combo is proposed. Based on the Assessor's information the parcel to the south, 107-06-040B, was spilt in February of 2011 but not processed through City of Tucson Planning and Development Services. That said, the previous split and the proposed split/combo would need to be processed and approved prior to approval of the site plan. 3. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a fully dimensioned detail that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B 6 & 7D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 For the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking provide a detail that includes; materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; specific type of rack. See LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B for layout requirements. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Remove the reference to D.S. 2-09 from keynote 7 as this development standard is no longer applicable. 5. Provide the plan on the site plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Per LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B two (2) Long-Term bicycle parking spaces are required. Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B are met. 6. Zoning acknowledges that this comment was not clear. Remove the fuel canopy from the Floor Area Ration calculation. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.3 The proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) does not include the Fuel Canopy. Revise the FAR calculation. 7. This comment was not addressed. For your information the propose sign location within the future right-of-way and future sight visibility triangle does not require a Development Standards Modification Request. Provide a note on the plan stating "ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE MS&R AREA (FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY) MUST BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF STREET WIDENING AT NO EXPENSE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON, AS REQUIRED BY ARTICLE 1, DIVISION 26 OF THE TUCSON ZONING CODE." 8. Depending on how the above comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm02497 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 10/06/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Show the street improvements along Flowing Wells Road per the discussions with Richard Leigh of Permits and Codes on all the plans and in the drainage statement. Paul Machado COT/PDSD |