Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM02395
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
09/29/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
09/29/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
10/04/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Need to submit special inspection certifications for approval 2. Kitchen Exhaust Hood Number 2 has been removed from the project. It also needs to be deleted from the structural calculations |
10/04/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the site plan. While zoning acknowledges the building plan for the expansion is in substantial compliance with the site plan the building cannot be approved at this time. The building plans must be approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers first. Also, there appears to be an additional site plan attached to the building plans. It is suggested that the approved site plan be attached and incorporated with the building plan set. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and if applicable approve the plans if the commercial plans reviewers approve the overall building plans. Zoning is willing to review and approve the building plans over the counter when the commercial plans reviewers have approved and stamped the building plans. |
10/04/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | None required as per interpretation from Jim Vogelsberg. |
10/05/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
10/17/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The site plan shows one water meter serving this building but the water demand shown on sheet P2 only considers the plumbing fixtures associated with part of the building. Determine the total demand that will be supported by the water meter and provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 5/8" water meter (Tucson Water has not used ¾" water meters in the past) will be allowed for this project. 2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
10/18/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate how the termination of the roof drain located in the northeast corner of the existing 1-story building will be affected by the installation of the new walk-in cooler. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Revise the drainage fixture units used to determine the size of the gravity grease interceptor using the values in Table 7-3; include all of the fixtures draining to the grease waste system (do not include separate fixture units for the floor sinks, just for the fixtures draining into the floor sinks). Reference: Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006. 3. Provide a specification for the gravity grease interceptor, including the size of the interceptor. Reference: Sections 103.2.3 and 1014.3, UPC 2006. |
10/18/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the tag numbers of the exhaust fans. EF-4 is shown on the mechanical floor plan and on the architectural roof plan, but is not scheduled; EF-3 is on the architectural roof plan and scheduled but not shown on the mechanical floor plan. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. Clarify where detail 109 occurs. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. |
10/19/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
10/25/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED WW/IWC REVIEW & APPROVAL OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR- TOM TOMCHAK- 443-6200 - 5025 W INA RD |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
10/27/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
10/27/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |