Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM02378
Parcel: 13405118Q

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM02378
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/04/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Fire Comments:

Sheets 1.0 and 1.1 The wall of the stair enclosures must be one hour around the enclosed storage on both stair ways. See IFC 1009.5.2.

Sheet 8.1 Doors 111A and 114A need to be one hour.

Sheet 1.0 and all first floor plan sheets. Door 111A must be moved outside of the stair enclosure per IFC 1009.5.2.
08/05/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. For the purpose of additional plan review assessment, please provide a summary of your deferred submittals to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose.
2. Please provide 2 sets of the latest approved site development plan.
3. At Stairs Numbers 112 and 113:
a. Both stairs require a 1 hour rated enclosure with fire rated doors.
b. The storage under the stairs must also be a fire rated enclosure as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1109.5.3.
c. Access to stair storage 111 must be outside the stair enclosure as per Section 1009.5.3.
4. Please provide hi/low water dispensers per each floor as required by the 2006 IBC, Chapter 29, Section 1109.5.1 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 602.4.
5. At Sheet 1.2:
a. As stated on sheet 0.1, the governing accessible code is as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter, ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. Please replace all ADAAG references with the above correct governing accessible code for this project.
b. Please delete detail A and show all accessible requirements (dimensions, clearances, accessories, signage and etc.) on the large scale floor plan and interior elevations.
c. Please correct all included ADAAG accessible requirements shown on the large scale floor plan and interior elevations to that of the ICC/ANSI 117.1 accessible code requirements. Please do not forget to add in the vertical grab bar at the toilet side.
6. Please provide attic venting as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1203.2.
7. Please provide special inspector certifications as outlined on sheet S0.0 for review and approval.
8. Covered patios and covered balconies are items for construction cost valuation. These were not included in the original valuation during the approval to submit review. They have now been added. A total square footage of 2,684 s.f. was calculated for additional valuation. Please confirm this area number and if you do not agree, please call for a review and adjustment.

STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB
9. SHEET S1.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAILS 5a, 5b, AND 5c): THE FOOTING SCHEDULE ON THE PLAN INDICATES THE NORTH AND SOUTH INTERIOR WALLS HAVE AN F2 FOOTING (2'-4" X 2'-0" GRADE BEAM), WHILE THE DETAILS INDICATE A 2'-4" X 2'-1" GRADE BEAM. CLARIFY.
10. SHEET S1.0; COLUMN SCHEDULE: UNDER THE C1 NOTES, ADD THE SPECIFIC DETAIL REFERENCE.
11. SHEET S1.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE DETAIL CUT AT THE EAST END OF THE NORTH COVERED WALK SHOULD INDICATE IF IT IS SIMILAR TO 4a OR 4b, OR BOTH. VERIFY.
12. SHEET S2.0; FRAMING PLAN: THE SOUTH EXTERIOR WALL OF THE 'FUTURE TENANT IMPROVEMENT' (ROOM 102) HAS TWO UNMARKED SHEAR WALLS (SW1). REVISE.
13. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL 13): THE DETAIL INDICATES 4X8 JOISTS, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES 4X10. CLARIFY.
14. SHEET S2.0 (FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL 14): DETAIL 14 INDICATES A STUD BEARING WALL, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A BEAM. CLARIFY.
15. SHEET S2.0; BEAM SCHEDULE: THE NOTE INDICATES TO 'PROVIDE STANDARD CAMBER BASED ON R=3500". CLARIFY.
16. SHEET S3.0 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 38): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE BEAM B-12 IS A 5 1/8 X 21 GLB, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES 5 1/8 X 18 GLB (B4 CONT.). CLARIFY.
17. SHEET S3.0; BEAM SCHEDULE: THERE ARE TWO BEAMS MARKED B5 IN THE SCHEDULE. REVISE.
18. SHEET S3.0; TRUSS PROFILES: THERE IS A T4 INDICATED ON THE PLAN, BUT NOT IN THE PROFILES. VERIFY.
19. SHEET S3.0; TRUSS PROFILES: T6 COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY.
20. SHEET S3.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S5.0 (DETAIL 15): DETAIL 15 CUT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING IS NOT CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION. THE DETAIL INDICATES JOISTS BEARING ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL, WHILE THE DETAIL CUT IS AT A WALL PARALLEL TO THE JOISTS. VERIFY.
21. SHEET S3.0 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET S5.1 (DETAIL 5): DETAIL 5 CUT AT THE NORTH WALL OF THE ELEVATOR IS NOT CORRECT AT THIS LOCATION. THE DETAIL INDICATES JOISTS PARALLEL TO THE WALL, WHILE THE DETAIL CUT IS AT A JOIST BEARING WALL. VERIFY.
22. SHEET S5.2; DETAIL 8: REVISE THE NOTE FOR THE BEAM.
23. SHEET S6.0; DETAIL 9: REFERENCE IS MADE TO DETAIL 3/S6.0 FOR A VERTICAL MASONRY CONTROL JOINT. IS THAT REFERENCE CORRECT? VERIFY.
END OF REVIEW
08/09/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied does nor include future blds #2 & #3
need to show location/method of connection to public sewer
need 3rd floor PCRWRD review of capaciiity & 3rd floor PCRWRD review of location/method of location to public sewer
08/16/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied
08/18/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope. Reference: Section 101.4, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006.
08/18/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide plumbing sheet P1.0. Reference: Section 103.2.2, UPC 2006.
2. Correct the plumbing plan and isometric labels on sheets P1.1 and P2.0. Reference: Section 103.2.2, UPC 2006.
3. Revise the water pressure calculations to include the static lift for the fixtures on the second floor. Reference: Section 610.1, UPC 2006.
4. Clarify detail 206 (i.e. where does it occur?). Reference: Section 103.2.2, UPC 2006.
5. Provide the dimensions for the roof scuppers. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006.
6. Provide calculations to show that the size of the overflows in the roof drain collector boxes have drainage capacities equal to minimum required scuppers. Reference: Section 1101.11.2.2.1, UPC 2006.
08/18/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Show the location of the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow assembly on the drawings and indicate their sizes. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
08/29/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
08/31/2011 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved