Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM02344
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/27/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S110; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 5 INDICATES TO "SEE DRAWINGS" FOR WPG #1 AND WPG #2. CLARIFY WHAT DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET S210; DETAIL 2: THERE SHOULD BE EXISTING DRILLED CONCRETE SHAFTS INDICATED ON THIS DETAIL. VERIFY. 3. SHEET S310; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A NEW W12X19 BEAM IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN SOUTH OF GRID 4 AND WEST OF GRID A. IF IT IS NEW, PROVIDE DETAILS (OR REFERENCE) FOR NEW BEAM CONNECTION TO EXISTING BEAMS, AND FOR EXISTING BEAMS TO THE NEW BEAM. 4. SHEET S310 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S410 (DETAIL 2): DETAIL 2 INDICATES A C8 PER PLAN, BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE THE C8 SIZE. CLARIFY. 5. SHEET S310 (KEYNOTE 7); SHEET S410 (DETAIL 4): DETAIL 4 INDICATES A HSS6X4X1/4 PIPE SUPPORT, WHILE KEYNOTE 7 INDICATES A HSS4X4X1/4. CLARIFY. 6. SHEET S310; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTES 6 AND 8 INDICATE TO "SEE DRAWINGS" FOR WPG #1 AND WPG #2. CLARIFY WHAT DRAWINGS. 7. SHEET S310; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE 4100# UNIT SUPPORT BEAMS DO NOT HAVE A SIZE INDICATED. PROVIDE. 8. SHEET S310; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN WHERE SUPPORT BEAM SIZES ARE NOT INDICATED. REVISE. 9. SHEET S310; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: THE PIPING SUPPORTS INDICATED ON THE PLAN SOUTH OF GRID 4 AND WEST OF GRID A ARE REFERENCED AS EXISTING. ARE THESE NEW OR EXISTING? VERIFY. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 08/09/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/11/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/11/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/11/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide plans with legible background information (the submitted drawings are too light to be successfully scanned). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 2. Provide calculations to show that the specified machinery room ventilation system complies with Section 1105, IMC 2006. 3. Provide specifications for the piping materials, piping joints, and connections being used (e.g. hydronic and refrigerant relief piping). Reference: Section 1202.1, IMC 2006. 4. Keynote 6 on sheet MH112 calls for a minimum separation of 20 feet for the refrigerant relief pipe terminations and the relief/intake hoods but one termination point is shown only 16 feet form an existing relief hood. 5. Revise the HVAC insulation specification to include the maximum conductivity (k, BTU per inch/h · ºF) allowable for each type of allowable pipe insulation. Reference: Section 102.1, IECC 2006. 6. Revise the insulation specification for heating hot water piping to comply with the requirements of Table 503.2.8, IECC 2006. |
| 08/15/2011 | RSHERRY1 | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | No new plumbing fixtures. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/24/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |