Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM01952
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/19/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved; coordinate the design of the water heater support shown in detail 3/P2.1 with the design shown on the revised structural calculations. [Original comment: Show how the water heater stand in detail 3/p-2.1 is connected to the structure above. Provide calculations to show that the "structure above" will support the weight.] |
| 08/22/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the energy code compliance calculations for the building addition using the construction components described in the drawings (e.g. steel stud walls, not masonry walls or wood-framed walls) and specify the U-factors for the doors and windows along with the solar heat gain coefficient for the glass. [Original comment: Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building addition (envelope) using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.] |
| 08/30/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 08/30/2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/01/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/01/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |