Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM01896
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/22/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Approved site plan required. |
| 06/24/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/29/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A8.0 (ELEVATIONS 4, 5, 6, AND 7); ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE (ROOMS 109, 110, 209, AND 210): CERAMIC TILE IS INDICATED AS A PORTION OF THE WALLS IN THE RESTROOMS, BUT NO NOTES WERE INDICATED IN THE SCHEDULE OR ON THE ELEVATIONS CONCERNING THE HEIGHT OF THE TILE. VERIFY. 2. SHEET S1: NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE OPERABLE PARTITION BEAM, COLUMN, OR FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE. 3. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/29/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed | |
| 07/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Show that the installation of the new plumbing fixtures does not result in the water service to the building being overloaded. Reference: Section 102.4, IPC 2006. |
| 07/06/2011 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. The proposed rooftop heat pump units are not shown in the same locations as they were on roof framing plan of the shell package. Verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. Show the location of FC-A. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006 4. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for FC-A. Reference: Section 307.2, IMC 2006 as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 814.0, UPC 2006. |
| 07/12/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM01896, 1851 S Pantano RD, Two Story Office Electrical denied for following: 1. Provide fault current calculations beginning at 400 A main on through to the individual panels. 2. Where is transformer T1 actually located ? Sheet E2.2 shows T1 transformer on the upper level with a disconnect beside it, this disconnect is not shown on the one line.Is the transformer outside ? If so indicate Nema rating. 3. Provide information on length of transformer secondary conductors, how do they comply with NEC 2005 240.21.C ? 4. Is transformer supported from structure ? If so show detail of support,or if floor mounted please indicate. 5. Lighting sheets , indicate panel designations not just circuit numbers. 6. Power sheets, indicate panel designations not just circuit numbers. Ray Majuta, Elect Pln Ck, PDSD, City of Tucson, 7/14/11, Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/15/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |