Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM01744
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/05/2011 | STANTEC | 2ND PARTY REVIEW | REVIEW | Denied | August 5, 2011 To: Ron Boose, Building Official City of Tucson Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 Re: Culligan Water - New Warehouse City of Tucson No. T11CM01744 Stantec Project No. 816-30015 (11-013) Plan review for the above-referenced project has been completed, per the 2006 IBC, IMC, IPC, IECC, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, the 2005 NEC, all with local amendments, and the Tucson Outdoor Lighting Code. This letter reflects comments to be addressed with a written response to each of the noted items indicating the action taken. In order to facilitate a shorter back-check time, we request that you please provide revised plans and calculations, clouding any changes that have been made. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The scope of this review covers Architectural, Structural, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittal provided. All portions of the project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. GENERAL: " There are no general comments to be addressed CIVIL: " The following comment been partially addressed. On Civil Sheet 1 of 4 there is a reference to a handicap ramp in front of the building; the reference indicates to look at a detail on Sheet 4 of 4. There is no ramp detail at this location. Please correct. Also, Keynote 14 on Sheet 3 of 4 indicates the location of truncated domes; the location is incorrect [ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13]. Truncated dome strips need to be 24" wide and are placed along the curb line adjacent to the parking area. The written response indicates that the approved civil drawings were corrected; the drawings we received "with approvals" do not show the comment addressed. The detail has been provided; however the truncated domes need to be moved onto the sidewalk [ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13.2]. ARCHITECTURAL: " There are no architectural comments to be addressed. STRUCTURAL: " There are no structural comments to be addressed. MECHANICAL: " There are no mechanical comments to be addressed. PLUMBING: " The following previously made comment has been partially addressed. Civil Sheet 3 of 4 is missing the rim elevation for new Public Manhole # 1 on Gunter Road, however based on the surrounding spot elevations it appears that the manhole's rim elevation will be slightly higher than the finish floor elevation of the new building. A back water valve is required [2006 IPC Sec. 715.1 as amended]. Sheet P1.0 makes reference to Detail 227 on Sheet P2.2; however Sheet P2.2 has not been revised to add this detail. Detail 227 has been added to Sheet P2.2, however the detail shows a cleanout which sweeps against the direction of the sewer flow; cleanouts must allow cleaning in the direction of the sewer flow [2006 UPC Sec. 707.6]. ELECTRICAL: " There are no electrical comments to be addressed. -End of Review- If you have any questions, please call (520) 750-7474. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Joel Svoboda Associate JES:jes Attachments: none |
| 08/10/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/15/2011 | SREEVES1 | WATER | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/16/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |