Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM01665
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/10/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Per 2006 IFC, fire sprinklers required for A-2 occupancies with an occupant load greater than 100. Please indicate on site plan method of supply sprinkler system. Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030. 2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D) 3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards. 4. The density required of the water supply. |
| 06/20/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. TERESA'S MOSAIC CAFE - WITH EXISTING GREASE INTERCEPTOR - FORMERLY PC - ANNEXED INTO COT 02/11/97 - DP 14/53 - EXISTING SEWER CONNECTION TO ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER PV98-035 ON ADJACENT PROPERTY PER SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT DKT10340 PG445 2. DISHWASHER, SPEED BAR, HAND SINK & BEER TAP DRAIN TO BE INDIRECT TO 2" FLOOR SINK 3. PARTIAL COUNT - EXISTING KITCHEN PLUMBING FIXTURES TO RAMAIN - (30FU'S PER ARCHITECT) 4. NEED WASTEWATER 5TH FLOOR CREDIT EVALUATION FOR REMOVAL OF 3 - 2" FS'S & SINK PER DEMO DRAWINGS PD1.0 & P2.0 |
| 06/21/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET S2.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LARGE AND SMALL STEEL TREE FOOTINGS. 2. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 2): THE BEAM DENOTED AS B2 ON THE PLAN WAS NOT LOCATED IN THE CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE. 3. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); DETAIL 221: NOTE 2 ON DETAIL 221 INDICATES A LEDGER, BUT GIVES NO SIZE. THE FRAMING PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE A LEDGER SIZE. PROVIDE. 4. SHEET S3.1; FRAMING PLAN: AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER FRAMING, IS THE 1 3/4" X 14" LVL FASCIA (NOTE 26) SUPPORTING THE J1 JOISTS (ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE EXTERIOR WALL)? VERIFY AND PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE FASCIA. 5. SHEET S3.1 (FRAMING PLAN); PLAN NOTES: NOTE 28 INDICATES TO REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL FOR THE STEEL TREES. THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS ON SHEET A5.1 REFERENCE STRUCTURAL. STRUCTURAL DETAILS 109 AND 110 INDICATE TREE MATERIALS. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE STEEL TREE DESIGNS. 6. SHEET S4.1; DETAILS 109 AND 110: BOTH DETAILS INDICATE A 3/16" WELD TYPICAL. WHAT DOES THIS WELD PERTAIN TO? CLARIFY. 7. SHEET A2.1; ADA CLEARANCE: ARE THE ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS ELEVATION EXISTING OR BEING ADDED TO THE EXISTING RESTROOMS? CLARIFY. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE A SEATING LAYOUT, INCLUDING SEATING/STANDING SPACES, INDICATING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1109.11, ARE MET. 9. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE OR LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/21/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 06/22/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: MOSAIC Cafe T11CM01665 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11cm01665.doc |
| 06/27/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Building Plan will be stamped approved once a stamped approved site plan is provided. The Site Plan is still in review status with a denial from Zoning. Once all comments are addressed Engineering will stamp the building plan approved. |
| 06/28/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/29/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify the location of the condensate pump for the new walk-in cooler; if it is located on the roof, how does the condensate get to it? 2. Clarify the orientation of the cleanouts shown for the condensate drains. 3. Clarify the termination for the condensate drains for the walk-in cooler and AC-2. |
| 06/29/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify detail 201, i.e. where does it occur? 2. Revise the size of the indirect waste pipe from P-5 from 1" to at least the size of the specified 1-1/2" trap. Reference: Sections 311.5 and 803.0, UPC 2006. 3. Provide material standards for all plumbing fixtures being provided by others. Reference: Section 401.1, UPC 2006. 4. Provide cleanouts for the indirect waste pipe from P-5 per Sections 707.4 and 707.5, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 803.0, UPC 2006. 5. Provide a trap for indirect waste pipes that exceed five feet in length but are less than fifteen feet long. Reference: Section 803.0, UPC 2006. 6. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. All roof areas shall be drained by roof drains, scuppers, or gutters. Provide dimensions of scuppers, downspouts, etc. Reference: Section 1101.11.1, UPC 2006. 7. Clarify the natural gas piping system. One existing AC unit is noted as having an input of 60 CFH on the Gas Meter Load table but 72 CFH on the Gas Diagram and on sheet P1.2. Also, the natural gas piping system is noted as having a developed length of 120 feet but the longest noted length is shown as 93 feet. 8. Revise the size of the existing natural gas main serving the water heater and the cook line; it is called out as 1-1/2" serving 647 CFH at 85 feet. |
| 07/01/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/15/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |