Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM01629
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: Sheets G1.4 and A8.0. Doors 110, 111, 109 etc. from rooms used for over 50 occupants for educational puroses are required to have panic hardware. See IFC 1008.1.9. |
| 06/02/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/10/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET g1.0; INDEX: SHEET g1.3 IS IDENTIFIED AS "CODE ANALYSIS WEST BUILDING", AND SHEET g1.4 IS IDENTIFIED AS "CODE ANALYSIS EAST BUILDING". REVISE. 2. SHEET g1.3 (PLUMBING FIXTURES TABLE); SHEET g1.4 (CODE ANALYSIS): THE OCCUPANCY LOAD ON g1.3 IS LISTED AS 860 OCCUPANTS (PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT IS BASED ON THIS FIGURE), WHILE THE OCCUPANCY LOAD ON g1.4 IS LISTED AS 1180. CLARIFY AND REVISE THE PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTS AS REQUIRED. 3. SHEET s1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES: IS THERE MASONRY ON THIS PROJECT? REMOVE IF NOT REQUIRED. 4. SHEET s1.0; STRUCTURAL NOTES: EXCEPT FOR THE STRUCTURAL STEEL TUBE COLUMNS, IS THERE OTHER STRUCTURAL STEEL ON THIS PROJECT? REMOVE IF NOT REQUIRED. 5. SHEET s2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 49): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE DSW2 HAS 228.19 LB./FT. SHEAR, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES IT IS A SW1 (155 LB./FT. CAPACITY). CLARIFY. 6. SHEET s2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 50): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE DSW3 HAS 175.41 LB./FT. SHEAR, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES IT IS A SW1 (155 LB./FT. CAPACITY)/ CLARIFY. 7. SHEET s2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): THE CALCULATIONS SHOW 6361 LB. OF SHEAR TO BE RESISTED BY A SHEAR WALL (INDICATED AS SW3 ON THE PLAN), BUT THERE IS NO WALL DESIGNATION ON THE KEY PLAN. IS THIS DSW4? VERIFY. 8. SHEET s2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 31): THE CALCULATIONS SHOW 5323 LB. OF SHEAR TO BE RESISTED BY A SHEAR WALL (INDICATED AS SW2 ON THE PLAN), BUT THERE IS NO WALL DESIGNATION ON THE KEY PLAN. IS THIS DSW5? VERIFY. 9. SHEET x1.2; DETAIL 5: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE FOR THE SCOUR PAD. 10. SHEETS a5.0, a6.0, a6.1, AND a6.2 (KEY NOTE 3.4); SHEETS s2.0 AND s2.1 (FOUNDATION NOTE 2): THE ARCHITECTURAL NOTE INDICATES THE CONCRETE BUILDING SLAB IS 5" THICK, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL NOTE INDICATES 4". CLARIFY. 11. SHEET a7.1; ELEVATION 9: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE COUNTER FOR THE ACCESSIBLE SINK PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.3. 12. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE OR LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 13. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 06/20/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | 1. HIGH SCHOOL - " NEW BUILDING SPACE" NO DEMO - WITHIN NEW ASSUMED PROPERTY LINES PER SITE ANALYSIS G1.3 2. CONNECTING TO EXISTING 8" PUBLIC SEWER WITH A 4" ON SITE PRIVATE SEWER 3. NEED COPY OF RICK ENGINEERING DRAWING "C3" FOR 4" ON-SITE PRIVATE SEWER FOR BASE MAP UPDATE - (IF OVER 3000 GL / DAY NEED DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT) 4. NEED 3RD FLOOR PCRQRD REVIEW & APPROVAL OF CAPACITY - CHAD AMATEAU 740-6547 5. NEED IWC/ REVIEW & APPROVAL OF ACID NEUTRALIZATION TANK FRO SCIENCE ROOM LABS - TOM TOMCHAK - 443-6200 - 5025 W. INA RD |
| 06/21/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/23/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/23/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/24/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide the size of the scupper draining the roof over the resource room (114); detail 15/A9.1, referenced in the keynote, does not apply to scuppers. 2. When calculating the required scupper sizes, include the effect of adjacent vertical walls per Section 1106.4, IPC 2006 and the area of the parapet, which drains onto the roof. 3. Provide cleanouts for the acid waste system, located not more than 100 feet apart and sized for the pipe they serve. Reference: Sections 708.3 and 708.7, IPC 2006. 4. Correct the size of the gas pipe serving AC-7, and the gas pipe serving AC-8 and the gas turret in room 111. Correct the total gas load on the gas meter serving the west building. 5. Detail 3/P4.0 calls for the T&P relief (and I assume the flue gas condensate) to be terminated over a mop sink. Where is the mop sink? |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/19/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |