Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM01609
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/11/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/12/2011 | SREEVES1 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | NEED TO BUILD PUBLIC SEWER- NEEPUBLIC SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT- 740-6733= NEED HOLD HARMLESS LETTER FOR PUBLIC SEWER NEED TO PERMIT ON-SITE 8" PRIVATE SEWER- NEED COPY OF PLAN FOR BASE MAP UPDATE- NEED DEQ REVIEW & APPROVAL IF OVER 3000 GAL/DAY FOR SITE- (243-7400) NEED 3RD FLOOR PCRWRD REVIEW OF CAPACITY, LOCATION & METHOD OF CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER |
07/18/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/25/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: LA Fitness T11CM01609 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until all other PDSD agencies have approved the building plan 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11cm01609.doc |
07/25/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide specifications for the temperature mixing valve (MV-3) shown on the plans. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006. 3. Comment not resolved. Section 418.0 requires that the shower valves conform to the requirements of ASSE 1016; include this in your specifications. [Original comment: Show how the proposed individual showers comply with the requirements of Section 418.0, UPC 2006.] 4. Comment not resolved; the net free open area does not appear to include the effect of screens, louvers, or grilles. (Note that Chapter 7, IMC 2006 does not pertain to natural gas-fired appliances; see either the 2006 UPC or the 2006 IFGC.) [Original comment: Show that the net free area of the specified combustion air ducts for the pool equipment room meets the requirements of Section 507.4, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 507.8, UPC 2006.] 5. Comment not addressed. Revise the Pipe Application Schedule in the Project manual to eliminate the use of PVC and ABS for domestic hot or cold water within the building. Eliminate the use of ABS for any domestic water use. Any plastic pipe used for potable water shall be listed as meeting the requirements of NSF 61. Reference: Section 604.0, UPC 2006. 6. Comment not addressed. If the use of PEX is to be allowed (Pipe Specification 34), provide a branch pipe sizing chart specifically for PEX tubing, based on a friction factor of 3.6 PSI per 100 feet and a maximum velocity of 8 feet per second. Reference: Section 610.0, UPC 2006. 7. Comment not addressed. Revise the size of the cleanout shown in detail 7/P4.1. Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006. 8. Comment not resolved. The northern-most vent has been corrected but the vent shown at the south end of the combination waste and vent system needs to be corrected. In addition, the vent through the roof is currently shown as 2"; it needs to be at least 3". Reference: Sections 905.4 and 910.3, UPC 2006. [Original comment: The vents shown in the combination waste and vent system as shown in detail 1/P3.2 are too small; each vent for a combination waste and vent system shall be at least one-half of the cross-sectional area of the pipe being vented. (The vents appear to be correctly sized on sheet P1.2, keynote #7.) Reference: Section 910.3, UPC 2006.] |
07/25/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not addressed. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (the correct climate zone is Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. |
07/27/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The Development Package must be approved first. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
08/04/2011 | SUE REEVES | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
08/04/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |