Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM01609
Parcel: 13613001U

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T11CM01609
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/26/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
Unable to determine location of panic hardware on doors from either plans or specs. Please provide specific information on sheet A5.0.
06/02/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The development plan must be approved first.
06/08/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A0.3; TRASH ENCLOSURE: REFERENCE THE WALL AND FOUNDATION TO STRUCTURAL.
2. SHEET A1.0: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE.
3. SHEET A3.3; ROOF PLAN KEY NOTES: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE ON NOTE 5.
4. SHEET A3.7; FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE ON NOTE 34.
5. SHEET A4.2; WALL SECTION KEY NOTES: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE ON NOTE 24.
6. SHEET A4.3; SECTION 3: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE 20/A6.0 AT THE CANOPY.
7. SHEET A5.1; DETAIL 16: REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN THE NOTE.
8. SHEET S001; FOUNDATION NOTES: NOTE 1 INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT WAS USED IN THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW.
9. SHEET S031; TYPICAL ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL HANGER DETAIL: THIS DETAIL INDICATES JOISTS AND DECK ARE EXISTING. REVISE.
10. SHEET S301; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: INDICATE THE STEEL BEAM SIZE AT THE HIGH WALL, JUST WEST OF GRID E BETWEEN GRIDS 11 AND 12.
11. SHEET S301; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A SECTION 317 CUT ON GRID F JUST NORTH OF GRID 6 IS INCORRECT. IT IS CUT THROUGH A JOIST GIRDER. REVISE.
12. SHEET S301; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A SECTION 317 CUT ON GRID D JUST NORTH OF GRID 6 IS INCORRECT. IT IS CUT THROUGH A JOIST GIRDER. REVISE.
13. SHEET S302; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: ALONG THE EAST AND WEST WALLS, THERE ARE ROOF DRAINS (TWO LOCATIONS) REFERENCING NOTE 4 (ROOF HATCH OPENING). REVISE THE NOTE REFERENCE.
14. SHEET S302; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: A SECTION 315 CUT ON GRID 1 IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
15. SHEET S402; SECTION 116: CALL OUT THE CONTINUOUS 2X KEY.
16. SHEET S501; SECTIONS 201 AND 202: PROVIDE THE STUD GAUGE IN NOTE 5, OR REFERENCE A NOTE.
17. SHEET S603; SECTIONS 338, 339, 340, 341, AND 342: PROVIDE THE STUD GAUGE IN THE SECTION NOTES, OR REFERENCE A NOTE.
18. SHEET S603; SECTION 346: NOTE 5 ON THE UPPER LEFT SIDE OF THE WALL IS INCORRECT. REVISE.
19. GENERAL: THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE NOT LOCATED FOR THIS REVIEW. PROVIDE TWO SETS.
20. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE OR LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED.
21. GENERAL: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATIONS ON SHEET S011.
22. GENERAL: PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE SITE WALLS ON SHEET S021.
23. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
06/09/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide specifications for the temperature mixing valve shown on the plans. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
2. Identify what appears to be a drain connection for a future deck drain directly west of the spa. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
3. Show how the shower drain located in the north bank of the women's shower room is to be drained (also not shown in detail 1/P3.1). Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
4. Clarify the size of the floor drain located in the eastern portion of the pool equipment room; it appears to be called out as both a 3" and a 2" floor drain. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006.
5. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.
6. Show how the proposed individual showers comply with the requirements of Section 418.0, UPC 2006.
7. Show that the net free area of the specified combustion air ducts for the pool equipment room meets the requirements of Section 507.4, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 507.8, UPC 2006.
8. Revise the Pipe Application Schedule in the Project manual to eliminate the use of PVC and ABS for domestic hot or cold water within the building. Eliminate the use of ABS for any domestic water use. Any plastic pipe used for potable water shall be listed as meeting the requirements of NSF 61. Reference: Section 604.0, UPC 2006.
9. If the use of PEX is to be allowed (Pipe Specification 34), provide a branch pipe sizing chart specifically for PEX tubing, based on a friction factor of 3.6 PSI per 100 feet and a maximum velocity of 8 feet per second. Reference: Section 610.0, UPC 2006.
10. Revise the size of the cleanout shown in detail 7/P4.1. Reference: Section 707.11, UPC 2006.
11. Clarify the uses for sinks S-2 and S-3; are they food preparation sinks? Reference: Section 801.2, UPC 2006.
12. The vents shown in the combination waste and vent system as shown in detail 1/P3.2 are too small; each vent for a combination waste and vent system shall be at least one-half of the cross-sectional area of the pipe being vented. (The vents appear to be correctly sized on sheet P1.2, keynote #7.) Reference: Section 910.3, UPC 2006.
13. Revise the length of the trap arm for the floor drain located in room 141 (Juice Bar) to conform to Table 10-1, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 1002.2, UPC 2006.
14. Revise the size of the roof drains and overflow drains per Table 11-1, UPC 2006 (the maximum roof area for a 3" roof drain is 2147 square feet and the maximum roof area for a 4" roof drain is 4613 square feet). Reference: Section 1106.0, UPC 2006.
06/13/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (the correct climate zone is Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006.
2. Clarify the size of the combustion air ducts and flues for the water heaters; they are shown as 4" on sheet M2.1 and as 6" on detail 13/P4.1.
06/13/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
06/14/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied
06/15/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied
06/15/2011 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: LA Fitness
T11CM01609
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 15, 2011


1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the development package has been approved.

3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped development package. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C:\planning\grading\t11cm01609.doc
06/20/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The development plan must be approved first.
06/22/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/28/2011 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/28/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed