Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM01352
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. Terminating a condensate drain over an overflow roof drain is not allowed for the same reason that you are not able to terminate over the roof drains in this building. See Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson for allowable termination locations.[Second comment: Comment not resolved. The note on detail 1/M-4.1 directs the condensate to the roof drain, the note on sheet M-2.1 specifies that the condensate is to go to a roof drain but not to an overflow drain, and note #3 of the rooftop unit schedule calls for the condensate to run to the "nearest sanitary". According to the building shell drawings, the roof drains terminate into the parking lot and are therefore not suitable for termination of the condensate drains. Show the size, route, and termination point for the condensate drains.] [Original comment: Clarify the ultimate termination point for the condensate drains. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Comment not resolved. The use of ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004 as modified by the City of Tucson requires the use of the default occupancy rates shown in Table 6-1, ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004, not the occupancies selected by the architect. [Second comment: Comment not resolved; Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson allows the use of the ASHRAE 62-1-2004 ventilation calculation procedure provided that the default occupant densities and combined outdoor air rates are used. In addition, revise the ASHRAE ventilation calculations to include an air distribution effectiveness value of 0.8 (ceiling supply, ceiling return, warm air greater than 15 degrees Fahrenheit above space temperature). Reference: Section 6.2.2.2, ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004.] [Original comment: The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2006 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type (e.g. ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004 as modified by the City of Tucson amendments). Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |