Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T11CM01352
Parcel: 105110700

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM01352
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/05/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Denied Please include the following fire sprinkler design criteria to the plans.
1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM)
Available from the Fire Department (520) 837-7029 or 837-7030.
2. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R, or NFPA 13D)
3. The hazard classification of the building, including any special hazards.
4. The density required of the water supply.
05/05/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
05/12/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM01352
4362 N Oracle #100
Paradise Restaurant

The electrical plans have been denied for the following:
1. Per City of Tucson Submittal Requirements -- designs exceeding 400 amps and where the available fault current at any new piece of equipment exceeds 22,000amps, a Registered Electrical Engineer (State of Arizona) must seal the plans.
2. Fault current calculations are required on the service and on through any equipment downstream untill brought to a level of 10,000amps or less.
3. The electrical service must be provided first in order to calculate downstream faults levels.
4. The permit for the service needs to be obtained first.
5. Provide information on the CP1 Panel arrangement, in the form of specification sheets. This equipment is required to be listed and approved as required per the NEC.
6. Indicate on the electrical plans that this installation is to comply with the 2005 NEC and current City if Tucson Amendments,
7. Sheet E2.2, circuit K2-20 shown for a freezer door, it is already used for part of a freezer circuit?
8. Sheet E2.2, circuit K1-41 shown as a door alarm,listed as spare in panel?
9. Provide 2006 IECC Lighting Budget calculations for interior.

Ray T Majuta,
Elect Pln Ck,
PDSD,City of Tucson,
5/12/11
Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov
05/13/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied GENERAL
1. Rework the occupancy load calculations to include the outdoor patio dining.
2. There are a couple of sheets that have lettering fonts smaller than our city of Tucson standard of 3/32" for both upper and lower case. Please increase the sizes to 3/32" minimum and resubmit.
3. Please provide structural calculations for the following:
a. All roof top mounted HVAC equipment
4. Please provide a copy of the last approved site development plan.
SHEETS A2.1.A AND EQ2.1
5. Please provide and show accessible seating as required by the 2006 IBC, Sections 1108 and 1109.
SHEET A4.1 AND GADA
6. Generic code copied accessibility details as shown on sheet GADA are not acceptable. The City of Tucson has adopted the 2006 IBC building code which uses Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 1171. 2003 Edition) as the governing accessibility code. Please delete these details as they are not the same as ICC (ANSI 117.1).
7. Please provide all accessibility dimensions, accessories, fixtures and clearances on the actual designed floor plans and interior elevations as required by the 2006 IBC Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition).
8. The men's toilet room needs a 5' diameter turn around clearance in the toilet space proper. See attached revision sketch on detail 11/A4.1 as a suggested solution.
9. The men's room toilet stall door must swing out as per ANSI 604.8.3.
SHEET A4.2
10. Insure the serving line showing detail 12 complies with ANSI, Section 904.5
END OF REVIEW
05/13/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Completed
05/16/2011 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
T11CM01352
4362 North Oracle Road
Tenant Improvement and Expansion for a new restaurant in a shopping center.


TRANSMITTAL: May 16, 2011


COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.


The restaurant is located in the OCR-2 zone in an approved shopping center (DS10-0024).

Clearly depict and dimension the outdoor dinning area. Also dimension the pedestrian passage area. Demonstrate that the outdoor dinning area does not exceed the approved square footage provided, for outdoor dinning, on the Development Plan (DS10-0024).
05/17/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Denied Verify that the new water demand on the existing water supply system will not cause the existing 2" water meter to be overloaded. Tucson Water limits a 2" meter to a maximum demand of 80 GPM. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 2" water meter will be allowed for this project. Reference: Sections 101.5.1, 610.2 and 610.12, UPC 2006 (Note: there is a 2" reduced pressure backflow assembly located downstream of the water meter.)
05/18/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Provide structural calculations for the mounting shelf to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006.
2. Provide information to show that the hub drain complies with Sections 411.1 and 804.1, UPC 2006.
3. Clarify how the floor drains located under the rear portion of the mini-rack ovens are readily accessible. Reference: Section 804.1, UPC 2006.
4. A double check valve is not acceptable for protecting the water supply to a carbonator. Reference: Section 603.4.12, UPC 2006.
5. Clarify the use of the 9D dual check valve for the mop sink faucet; i.e. what is the water supply being protected from? Reference: Sections 602.1 and 603.4.7, UPC 2006.
6. Appliances (e.g. chemical dispensers) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Table 6-3, UPC 2006 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Reference: Sections 602.3, 603.0, and Table 6-2, UPC 2006.
7. Provide approved pressure-absorbing devices (e.g. water hammer arrestors) for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick-acting or solenoid valves. The field-fabricated air chambers implied in note 11, sheet P-2.4 are not approved. Reference: Section 609.10, UPC 2006.
8. Clarify the size of the branch piping for the flush valves. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6.
9. Provide a direct waste connection for the wash and rinse sections of the 3-compartment sink, with an indirect connection for the sanitizing compartment only. Reference: Sections 304.0, 704.3, and 801.2.3, UPC 2006.
10. Specify the size of the proposed gravity grease interceptor, based on the connected fixtures and Table 10-3, UPC 2006. Reference: Section 1014.3.6, UPC 2006.
05/18/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Clarify the ultimate termination point for the condensate drains. Condensate drains may not terminate over a roof drain unless the roof drain terminates at or above grade in an area capable of absorbing the condensate flow without surface drainage. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan, EF-3, to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006.
4. The occupant load used to calculate the required ventilation is not necessarily the same as the occupant load used for calculating exiting requirements. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2006 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type (e.g. ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2004 as modified by the City of Tucson amendments). Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006.
5. Provide justification for the use of a Type II hood over the convection/steamer ovens. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.2, IMC 2006.
6. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type II hood mounted over the ovens is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2006. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006.
05/18/2011 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/02/2011 GERARDO BONILLA OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
06/02/2011 SUE REEVES REJECT SHELF Completed