Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T11CM01218
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Miracle Court Studio Galleries T11CM01218 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 6, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance due to a change of use for the areas of change on the site plan. 2. This comment was not addressed; show the setback dimension on the plan. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It appears that there are existing covered walk-ways, (dashed lines shown on the site plan) that encroach in the parking area access lanes (PAALs). Per Ordinance #10886 LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.1.a A one (1) setback is required to an open structure, such as a carport or covered pedestrian access path as measured from the closest part of the structure or roof overhang. Show the required setback on the plan. 3. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 Per D.S 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicle travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. That said sidewalks along the PAALs must be physically separated from the PAAL. 4. It is not clear how this comment was fully addressed. A continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is shown near the southwest corner of Retail Units 9, 10, 11. It is not is this is concrete existing or new. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 D.S. 2-08.3.1 A continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route will be provided to all pedestrian circulation paths located in any adjacent streets. Provide a sidewalk to 14th Avenue. If there is no sidewalk within the right-of-way along 14th Avenue the sidewalk will be provided to the property line along 14th Avenue. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 There are vehicle gates shown on the plan demonstrate on the plan how a vehicle could maneuver on site and exit if the gates were closed. 6. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 Based on the most current aerial photos the "EXISTING MONUMENT SIGE TO REMAIN" called out under "SITE PLAN KEY NOTES: is actually a pole sign. Provide the size and height of this existing sign. 7. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.19 As Miracle Mile is shown on the City of Tucson's Major Street and Routes Map as an Arterial Route with a future width of 150' show the future right-of-way on the site plan along with the dimensions. 8. This comment was not fully addressed. Both food service and retail sales have subject to sections. Provide the subject to sections on the plan. "FACILITIES AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE STORGE" is not a use listed in the LUC. If this is storage for one of the other uses shown on the plan than the parking would be calculated at the same ratio as the use. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the existing and proposed use on the site plan. The existing and proposed use should be listed as uses shown within the LUC. As a mixed use is proposed provide all proposed used on the plan along with the correct development designators and any subject sections. 9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the development designators for both proposed uses. Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5 and General Merchandise Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A 10. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 The vehicle parking calculation is not correct. Until comment 8 above is addressed the vehicle parking calculation cannot be verified. 11. This comment was not addressed, see comment 8 above. D.S. 2-02.2.2.A.4 Please clarify what the proposed "STORAGE" areas are to be used for. If this storage area is for either the retail or food service uses called out on the plan than it is parked as part of that use. If it is separate Commercial or Personal Storage than provide a parking calculation that meets the requirements of Ordinance #10886 LUC Section 3.3.4.2. 12. As this plan has not been approved remove all revision clouds from the plan. 13. Depending on how the above comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm01218 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 06/08/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 20, 2011 T11CM01218 Site Plan Review 1. Revise the notation on Miracle Mile to indicate a future right-of-way dimension of 150 feet (75 foot half right-of-way.) Also indicate that Miracle Mile is an MS&R arterial. Even though Andy McGovern has indicated that future widening is unlikely, the current MS&R plan lists the future dimension as 150 feet. This must be reflected on the plan until the plan is revised. 2. Gated entries are now proposed for the project site. Show how vehicles that enter the site while the gates are locked will be able to turn around and leave without having to back into adjacent streets. 3. Clarify the proposed location for the solid waste container. In the latest aerial photos, the container is shown within the area shown as parking along the south boundary. If the container will be serviced from the location shown on the plans, show the dimensions of the container and the service area. Show the access to the container as well. It appears in the aerial photos that the mobile home park across the alley from the project parcel uses a dumpster located within the alley outside of the existing fence for this parcel. Please clarify this situation. 4. Clarify the location of curbs and paved areas on the site plan. Provide notes or labels as necessary. |
| 06/28/2011 | RICK MYERS | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/05/2011 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 12/05/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |