Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM01154
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/21/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/02/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET EC-1; NOT IN SCOPE OF WORK: NOTE 4 INDICATES FOOTINGS ARE NOT IN MADISON'S SCOPE OF WORK, WHILE THE CALCULATIONS INCLUDE THE FOOTING DESIGN. CLARIFY AND REVISE. 2. SHEET FC-1: PROVIDE NOTES FOR CONCRETE AND REINFORCING DESIGN STRENGTHS, OR REFERENCE ANOTHER SHEET FOR THIS INFORMATION. 3. SHEET FC-1: REFERENCE THE ALLOWABLE SOIL PRESSURES USED FOR DESIGN, AND INCLUDE THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT NUMBER. 4. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/04/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The minimum opening height for a scupper is 4". Reference: Section 1101.11.2.1, UPC 2006. 2. Provide a cleanout at the base of each vertical roof drain leader prior to its connection with the horizontal storm drain. Reference: Section 1101.12.2, UPC 2006. |
| 05/06/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/13/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 05/13/2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the building plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next building plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 05/17/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/17/2011, The building plan shall be approved after the approval of the Development Plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 08/08/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |