Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM01151
Parcel: 12510003F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - T11CM01151
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/22/2011 DROBEY1 FIRE REVIEW Denied
04/25/2011 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Denied need to show on drawings all addresses including suite #'s of all areas to be demo'd
need to identify on drawings all wastewater plumbing fixtures to be removed in each suite
need PCRWRD/3rd fl credit evaluation-Karen-740-6344.
05/05/2011 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. SHEET A1.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 3 INDICATES A SOILS ENGINEER MADE RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSING THE EXISTING BASEMENT. IF A REPORT WAS PRODUCED, PROVIDE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW.
2. SHEETS A1.0/A1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES THERE IS A SOILS REPORT ADDRESSING THE REMOVAL OF CAISSONS. PROVIDE THAT REPORT TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW.
3. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: ON KEY NOTE 6, INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE.
4. SHEET A2.1; KEY NOTES: ON KEY NOTE 6, INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE.
5. SHEET A2.1; DETAILS 04, 06, AND 08 (KEY NOTES 1): INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE.
6. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATIONS 03, 04, AND 05: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. SEVERAL OF THE KEY NOTE REFERENCES SHOULD BE REVISED.
7. SHEET A3.2; ELEVATIONS 01 AND 02: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. SEVERAL OF THE KEY NOTE REFERENCES SHOULD BE REVISED.
8. SHEETS S1.1 AND S1.2; DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 3 INDICATES THERE IS A SOILS REPORT ADDRESSING BACKFILL AT THE BASEMENT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW.
9. SHEETS S1.1 AND S1.2; DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES A SOILS ENGINEER MADE RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSING THE EXISTING BASEMENT. IF A REPORT WAS PRODUCED, PROVIDE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW.
10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
05/13/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/20/2011 DELMA ROBEY OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed