Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM01151
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/22/2011 | DROBEY1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 04/25/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to show on drawings all addresses including suite #'s of all areas to be demo'd need to identify on drawings all wastewater plumbing fixtures to be removed in each suite need PCRWRD/3rd fl credit evaluation-Karen-740-6344. |
| 05/05/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A1.0; KEY NOTES: NOTE 3 INDICATES A SOILS ENGINEER MADE RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSING THE EXISTING BASEMENT. IF A REPORT WAS PRODUCED, PROVIDE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW. 2. SHEETS A1.0/A1.1; KEY NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES THERE IS A SOILS REPORT ADDRESSING THE REMOVAL OF CAISSONS. PROVIDE THAT REPORT TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW. 3. SHEET A2.0; KEY NOTES: ON KEY NOTE 6, INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE. 4. SHEET A2.1; KEY NOTES: ON KEY NOTE 6, INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE. 5. SHEET A2.1; DETAILS 04, 06, AND 08 (KEY NOTES 1): INDICATE THE SPECIFIC 2X WOOD FRAMING MEMBER SIZE. 6. SHEET A3.0; ELEVATIONS 03, 04, AND 05: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. SEVERAL OF THE KEY NOTE REFERENCES SHOULD BE REVISED. 7. SHEET A3.2; ELEVATIONS 01 AND 02: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. SEVERAL OF THE KEY NOTE REFERENCES SHOULD BE REVISED. 8. SHEETS S1.1 AND S1.2; DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 3 INDICATES THERE IS A SOILS REPORT ADDRESSING BACKFILL AT THE BASEMENT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW. 9. SHEETS S1.1 AND S1.2; DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES A SOILS ENGINEER MADE RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSING THE EXISTING BASEMENT. IF A REPORT WAS PRODUCED, PROVIDE TO THE CITY OF TUCSON FOR REVIEW. 10. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/13/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |