Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU
Permit Number - T11CM00991
Review Name: RESIDENTIAL - BLDG/ZONING-WALKTHRU
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/05/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 04/07/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul: Planning Technician PROJECT: T11CM00991 4874 East 13th Street Carport & storage room additions to SFR TRANSMITTAL: June 27, 2011 COMMENTS: The following comments are for the purpose of applying for a variance before the Board of Adjustment. The site is in the R-1 Zone (LUC Section 2.3.4.2.A.1.). The Development Designator is "G" (LUC Section 3.2.3.1.B). The Perimeter Yard Indicator is AA (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The request for variance is for a reduced setback and driveway length along the north property line. The request for the variance also includes reductions to the side yard setbacks. The minimum setback is twenty (20) feet to the property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A). The minimum driveway length is eighteen (18) feet to the property line from the front door of the garage (LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.2.a). The proposed driveway length is fifteen (15) feet, six (6) inches to the property line. The minimum setback is the greater of six (6) feet or two-thirds (2/3) the height (H) of the structure's wall facing any interior lot property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). The required setback for the covered patio addition on the rear of the SFR along the east property line is six (6) feet. The proposed setback is three (3) feet. The required setback for the shed additions and the carport addition to the west property line is six (6) feet (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.B and 3.2.6.4). The proposed setback is one (1) foot, six (6) inches to the west property line for the shed addition and three (3) feet for the carport addition. The detached sheds along the east property line, and the ramada along the west property line, no longer require permits for the location only. The large shed in the south-east corner shall require a building permit. (See the residential reviewer for building code concerns.) |
| 04/07/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | NPPO | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/05/2011 | CPIERCE1 | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |