Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - T11CM00979
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2011 | SREEVES1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/11/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments: No square footage can be added to unsprinklered A-2 with occupant load over 100. See IFC Chapter 9. |
| 04/11/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: T11CM00979 1220 E. Prince Rd Site Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 04/14/11 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan for the proposed expansion of a restaurant must meet the criteria of DS 2-02 for a site plan. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. The following comments may change based upon what has been previously approved. 2. The proposed development in the front of the existing structure must meet the criteria for the MS&R future widening. Provide a future site plan showing how this site will meet code once the widening takes place along with a copy of the recorded MS&R covenant or design this project to meet the future widening requirements. 3. DS 2-02.2.1.A.2 On the site plan provide the legal description of the property. There appears to have been multiple splits and combination of parcels done on this property. Provide a history of the splits and combos. Additional comments may apply based on information provided. The boundaries shown on the site plan do not match the county assessors maps in regards to the carport/garage in the southeast corner. Clarify. If this carport/garage has been incorporated into this site, clearly indicate that the project to the south (condominiums) has adequate parking for the number of residences. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.4 Provide a location map which meets the minimum requirements of D.S. 2-05.2.1.D, show the subject property approximately centered in the one (1) square mile area, identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses, section, township and range, north arrow and scale. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.6 For the existing building provide overall dimensions, height, overhangs, canopies and use on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.8 Provide a width dimension for all vehicle parking spaces located adjacent to any wall or fence. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.B.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. The above applies tow parking spaces as well as the 3 parking spaces for the neighboring office. These parking spaces will also require a cross access agreement to be provided. Provide recording information on the plan. The parking spaces along both the east and west property lines will require wheel stops to be provided in order to prevent damage to the fence and or overhanging the property line. Provide a dimensioned standard parking space detail. The number of provided parking spaces does not meet the number of required parking spaces. A Board of Adjustment variance may be required. It appears that parking spaces may be located within an ingress/egress easement along the south property line. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 Bicycle parking will be required for the expansion if no bicycle parking is provided per the last approved site plan. Clearly indicate the location of the required long term and short term parking with detail of racks and parking spaces. See the new LUC Sec.3.3.8 for requirements of bicycle parking. (ordinance 10866) 8. DS 2-01.2.1.A.10 Provide both existing and future sight visibility triangles. 9. DS 2-01.2.1.A.11 Provide dimensions for the PAALs along the south side of the building. Does not appear to meet the minimum 24'. PAALs may be required along the south property line for access easement. 10. DS 2-01.2.1.A.12 Provide a pedestrian circulation path connecting from the building to the sidewalk in the right of way along Prince Rd. 11. DS 2-01.2.1.A.20 Provide the location and recording information for all existing and proposed easements. See the final plat for the condominium project to the south which has ingress and egress easements on this property for access to the carport/garage. Book 58 Page 91. 12. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.13 If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 13. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 Show the existing zoning of the adjacent parcels, including those across streets and alleys. 14. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.31 Provide the proposed use on the plan "Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5". 15. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\T11CM00979.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 04/22/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Four parking accessible spaces are required by Table 1106.1 for a total of 83 parking spaces. Please provide two additional accessible parking spaces. One of those must be "Van Accessible". 2. Provide an accessible route to the Prince Road right of way. Include all marked crossings as required in compliance with the 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 106, 405, 406, 406.12 and 406.14. 3. Identify the accessible route and show slope compliance with ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 403.3. 4. Provide large scale details of the accessible parking layouts showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, slopes, curb/sidewalk ramps, signage and access to the accessible route. 5. Provide a large scale signage details including "Van Accessible" signage and their locations. END OF REVIEW] |
| 05/02/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Goldstein, Roumbos, Petrick & Assoc,DATE: May 2, 2011 6380 E. Tanque Verde Rd. #100 Tucson, Arizona 85715 Subject: Guadalajara Grill, 1220 E. Prince Rd. Site plan T11CM00979 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement. The Site Plan (SP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Provide a site plan per the COT Development Standard No. 2-02.0 Site Plan Content and Specifications. 3. Provide general notes per D.S. 2-02.0. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 7. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. It appears that the service vehicle cannot back up without running into an existing parking space. The service vehicle must have a 14'x40' clear area in which to maneuver. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. If both quantities are zero, the quantities shall be called out on the cover sheet. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. It appears if the keynotes were mixed up. Re-check the call outs and re-label as required. 11. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0. Per the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan, 6' sidewalks are required in the public r/w. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 15. Show Site plan number (T11CM00979) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. or provide a document from Environmental Services approving the plan as-is. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. 20. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 21. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 22. A grading permit may be required for this project dependant on the cut and fill quantity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1220 E. Prince Rd. Site |
| 05/03/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the next upstream and downstream manholes g. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/04/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Provide a copy of the last approved site and landscape plans. The proposed development in the front of the existing structure must meet the criteria for the MS&R future widening. Provide a future site & landscape plans showing how this site will meet code once the widening takes place along with a copy of the recorded MS&R covenant or design this project to meet the future widening requirements. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed, and appropriate revisions. are reflected on the landscape plan. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/04/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/23/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/23/2012 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |