Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Permit Number - T11CM00977
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/16/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/16/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Everlasting Father Christian Church - Parking Reconfig. T11CM00977 Site Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 Per LUC Section 3.2.6.3 Where an unbroken section of a wall or a building is not parallel with the lot line, the required perimeter yard may be applied to the average width; however, such perimeter yard shall not be narrower at any point than half the required width, nor narrower at any point than three (3) feet. That said show dimensions at the southwest and southeast corners of the building to the property line. If the setback dimension from the southwest corner of the building to the property is less than 5'-3" a Design Development Option (DDO) is required for setback. 3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.It does not appear that the proposed church building meets street perimeter yard future setback. Currently there are discussions in regards to the future right-of-way (R|OW) for Grande Ave. which may effect this project. Connect Jose Ortiz, COT Transportation and/or Craig Gross PDSD to see if this discussion has been completed. If the future ROW remains at 100' than a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) will be required for a building encroaching into the Sight-Visibility-Triangle (SVT) D.S. 3-01.5.1.A.1. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 The Short-term bicycle parking detail shall include a fully dimensioned layout that meets the requirement of Ordinance 10886 LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 & .8. 5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.9 It does not appear that the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking meets the requirements of Ordinance 10886 LUC Section 3.3.9.3.B.1. Demonstrate on the plan how this LUC Section is met. 6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The back-up spur located on the south end of the southern most parking does not meet the 6'-0" requirement of Ordinance #10886 LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D. 7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.28 The zoning shown on the west side of Grande Ave. is not correct. The zoning should be listed as O-3 & C-1. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\site\2011\t11cm00983 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan. |
| 05/25/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City of Tucson Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission for use of the right of way 2. A 5' wall is required to screen adjacent residential properties from vehicle use area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include with re-submittal DDO approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/26/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: BRAMIC Design Group DATE: June 2, 2011 6255 N. Cam. Primera Alta Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Everlasting Christian Church, 450 N. Grande Ave. Site plan T11CM00977 (Second Review) T14S, R13E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. It appears that the drawing is not to scale although it is labeled 1"=20'. Therefore I was not able to determine whether the service vehicle's approach and turning radii were sufficient to approve. Other comments may be warranted when the properly scaled plans have been re-submitted. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/450 N. Grande Ave Site 2 |
| 06/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to verify the location and size of the water meter. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |