Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T11CM00977
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/13/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/13/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET TS.1; SHEET INDEX: SHEET P1.0 IS MISSING FROM THIS REVIEW SET. VERIFY. 2. SHEET TS.1; GENERAL NOTES: CHANGE THE ICC/ANSI CODE TO 2003. 3. SHEET C.1; SITE PLAN NOTES (I.B.C. CODE REVIEW): THE OCCUPANT LOAD SHOWN IS FOR THE SANCTUARY ONLY (1120 SF). PROVIDE THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD ON THE DRAWINGS FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING (2304 SF). 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: SHEET A.1: PROVIDE DRINKING FOUNTAIN AND SERVICE SINK ON DRAWINGS. 5. SHEET A.1: PROVIDE DETAIL FOR BRACING TOP OF INTERIOR PARTITION WALLS, INCLUDING BRACING SIZE AND SPACING, AND BRACING CONNECTION TO TOP OF PARTITION WALL AND TO EXISTING STRUCTURE ABOVE. 6. SHEET TS.1: PROVIDE PLUMBING COUNT PER CHAPTER 29 OF THE 2006 IBC AND INCLUDE ON DRAWING. 7. SHEET A.1; ELEVATION 2: DISTANCE TO PAPER DISPENSER SHOULD BE 7"-9" TO CENTERLINE OF DISPENSER PER ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.7. 8. GENERAL: PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF DRAWINGS FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON REVIEW. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/16/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Everlasting Father Christian Church - Parking Reconfig. T11CM00977 Building Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 16, 2011 1. The building plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning can not approve the building plan until the site plan has been approved. 3. Zoning will re-review the building plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C:\planning\grading\t11cm00977.doc |
| 05/20/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/31/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed. Provide floor drains for the restrooms. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not addressed. Show that the restroom floors slope toward the floor drains. Reference: Section 411.2, UPC 2006 3. Comment not addressed. Verify the required minimum water pressure required for the specified water closet is not greater than the 15-PSI used in the water pipe sizing calculations. Revise calculations as necessary. Reference: Section 608.1, UPC 2006. 4. Comment not addressed. The branch piping sizes called out for the urinal flush valve will result in a water velocity greater than 8 FPS. Limit the water velocity to less than 8 FPS for the copper piping. Reference: Sections 610.12 and A 6.1, UPC 2006 and IS 3-2003, Section 2.6. |
| 06/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not addressed; Pima County records list this building as vacant, not an existing church. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation for the proposed occupancy of this building. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Comment not addressed. If air conditioning is supplied to the restrooms, verify that the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans will exhaust all of the air supplied to the restrooms. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2006. |
| 06/06/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. The revised site drawing shows the location of a 2" water meter but it appears to be located on an adjacent parcel. In addition, no reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly is shown. Reference: Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. 2. Comment not resolved; the plumbing plan still indicates that a 5/8" meter is supplying the proposed church. Provide a letter from Tucson Water confirming that the use of a 5/8" water meter will be allowed for this project (there will be 22 fixture units in the building once the minimum plumbing fixtures are added to the plans which equates to a demand of 15 GPM). Note that this is an A-3 (assembly) occupancy. |