Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T11CM00884
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/09/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. With a 1250-pound operating weight, structural calculations are required to show that installation of the Airdyne Refrigeration GP-9 Glycol-pak system will not jeopardize the structural integrity of the building. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. [Show the location, size, and operating weight for the Airdyne Refrigeration GP-9 Glycol-pak system. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; sheet m1 still shows RTU-5 supplying 2935 CFM to the space. A 5-ton unit typically supplies about 2000 CFM. Also, verify if the existing RTU is capable of supporting the 1558 CFM of outside air as called for in the ventilation calculations. [Clarify the balancing requirements for the existing rooftop heat pumps. Note #10 on sheet m1 indicates a total air flow for a 10-ton unit, not a 5-ton unit. In addition, the outside air requirement shown in note #10 does not agree with the outdoor air calculations. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved; sheet m1 still shows RTU-4 supplying at least 2660 CFM to the space (one of the supply diffusers is unlabeled). A 4-ton unit typically supplies about 1600 CFM. Also, verify if the existing RTU is capable of supporting the 1082 CFM of outside air as called for in the ventilation calculations. [Verify the capacity of RTU-4; it is shown as a 5-ton heat pump on sheet m1 but the shell drawings indicate that it is a 4-ton heat pump. Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006.] 4. Comment not resolved; revise the exhaust fan airflow shown in the ventilation calculations to coordinate with the exhaust fan specifications. [Coordinate the balancing requirements for the restrooms. Each restroom exhaust fan (EF-2?) is shown with an air flow of both 75-CFM (Outdoor Air Calculations) and 90-CFM (Exhaust Fan Schedule). Since the supply air is shown as 150-CFM, both exhaust air flows are incorrect. Reference: Sections 403.2.1 (4) and 403.3, IMC 2006.] |
| 05/09/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Comment not resolved. The submitted calculations indicate that either a 4-inch, 14-gauge stud or a 6-inch, 20-gauge stud is required to support the water heater platform but the only wall sections in the plan-set are for 3.625-inch, 20 gauge studs. Determine also if the finish materials (e.g. sheet rock) can accommodate the projected deflection of the studs. [Revise the design for the mounting shelf for the water heater to show how the shelf and water heater are to be "anchored to the wall in an approved manner." Provide structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 303.1 and 308.1, IPC 2006.] 2. Comment not resolved; contact either Doug Kirkland (443-6202) or Tom Tomchak (443-6217) at the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department to determine if a grease interceptor is required. They have required other yogurt shops to provide interceptors in the past. [Verify that a grease interceptor will not be required for this activity by the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department. Reference: Section 701.5, IPC 2006.] 3. Comment not resolved. The 3" horizontal drain running south from the hand sink (P3) along the west wall of the suite requires a 3" cleanout. [Revise the size of the cleanouts based on the size of the drainage piping they serve. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2006.] |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2011 | SUE REEVES | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 05/13/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |