Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T11CM00869
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/28/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | need to build public sewer need 3rd floor pcrwrd capacity review- 740-6547- Chad Amateau |
| 03/30/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Fire Comments; Please provide a written response to each and note the page where the correction was made: Sheet A1.02 Please include the following design criteria to the plans. 1. Flow data (static pressure, residual pressure, GPM) Available from the Fire Department (520) 791-4502. 2. The hazard classification of the parts of the building, including any special hazards. 3. The density required of the water supply. 4. The standard to be used in development of sprinkler system. (NFPA 13, NFPA 13R not allowed, even in stairs.) Sheets A1.06x 1. Many sections cannot be read. Sheet A1.20 1. Verify the distance between the sprinklered building and the unsprinklered ramada provides the fire separation required by the IBC to be considered two separate buildings. 2. Site 6 of 9 and L 5 show an exterior exit stair on the west side of the east building. They do not show up in the building elevation 6/A4.51. Show they meet IFC 1023.4 for yard spacing to unsprinklered building. 3. Panic hardware and out swing doors are required from Group A-3 occupancies. Sheets A4.01 and L10 1. Show the pool enclosure required by Arizona Revised Statutes. Sheet A4.52 1. The foam trim over 50 feet in elevation does not meet IBC 2605.2. Please provide listing (ICC ES) for trim. Sheet A6.10 1. The standpipe reference is given as Sheet A6.25; there is no 6.25 in this set. 2. Where is the communication for the areas of refuge required by IFC 1007.6.3? 3. Where are the signs required by IFC 1007.6.5? Sheet A8.01 1. Panic hardware and out swing doors are required from Group A-3 occupancies such as the Club Room. See IFC Sections 1008.1.2 and 1008.1.9. 2. The Computer, Fitness, and Study rooms would more properly be Group B occupancies. Sheets E2.x 1. The heat detectors in the corridors and elevator areas shall be smoke detectors per IFC 907.2. The fire sprinklers shall also control the cross corridor doors. Sheets E2.1x 1. Where is the communication for the areas of refuge required by IFC 1007.6.3? Sheets E 3.0 and E etc. 1. All dwelling units shall be provided with the capability to be equipped with visual alarm notification. See IFC 907.10.1.4. 2. Cooking devices appear to be closer than the 10 feet allowed by IFC 308.3.1. |
| 04/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide envelope energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope using the climate zone for Pima County < 4,000 feet. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the envelope energy compliance of the building. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006 2. Coordinate the dwelling room types shown on the mechanical floor plans with the mechanical room details (sheets M-3.0 through M-3.4). Reference: Section 106.3.1, IMC 2006. 3. Verify that the plans provide a separation of at least ten feet between air intake openings (AHU #1) and exhaust openings (bathroom fans and dryer vents). Reference: 401.4.1, IMC 2006. |
| 04/04/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Due to comments by review staff it appears that the development package site plan will have to be revised. Ensure that the Architectural site plan in the building package is revised to match the revised development plan. 2. While it appears that the building footprints match the unapproved version of the development plan foot prints the actual dimensions could not be verified. The building footprints on the development package are not dimensioned. Include a copy of the footprints from the development package or include it in the development package for review. 3. Ensure that the bicycle parking facilities are depicted on the first-floor plans sheets where applicable. 4. Zoning has reviewed the building plans for zoning requirements. While zoning finds the building plans in substantial compliance with the not-approved development package site the building plans cannot be approved at this time. All building plans must be approved by all commercial plans reviewers and approval of the development package is required. A copy of the approved and stamped development package must be included with the building plans on the next submittal. Also, there is an appeal to the MDR process pending and that must be addressed (prior to zoning approval). 5. Address zoning and all other comments prior to re-submittal of the building plans. |
| 04/04/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a cleanout at the base of each waste stack. Reference: Section 708.3.4, IPC 2006 2. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101.2, 1101.7, 1106.4, and 1107, IPC 2006. |
| 04/05/2011 | RONALD BROWN | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | GENERAL 1. The minimum size font for all drawings is 3/32", upper and lower case. Several sheets in this set are non compliant. Please revise the non-compliant sheets and resubmit. a. Please redo all the A1.06 sheets and make them legible. 2. For the purpose of assessing addition plan review fees, please provide a letter to the building official, Mr. Ron Boose, summarizing all the items for deferred submission. 3. An approved site development plan must be submitted prior to permit issuance. 4. Please provide special inspection certifications for review and approval. 5. Please obtain a health department review. Please provide health department activity number. 5A. Please provide a list of hazardous materials stored in the pool room and their quantities. SHEET A1.02 6. Please revise the Code Summary, Occupancy Classification to include the clubhouse occupancy types of "B" and "A3". 7. Please provide an occupancy load schedule by occupancy use and floor by floor with a total summarization at the end. This includes the "B" and "A3" classifications of the club house. 8. It is noted that the Ramada is not sprinkled. Please verify the building separation and fire resistance ratings as per Chapter 6 and table 602. 9. In the Code Summary list and the Accessibility Compliance Notes, please note that the only recognized accessibility code for this project is the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition). Remove all reference to any other accessibility code. 10. As per a note at the unit tabulations, 5 units are required to be type "A". Please continue the explanation as to the requirements of the 2006 IBC, Section 1107.6.1.2 for type "B" units. 11. Please provide a building analysis for the fire resistance rating requirements for building elements as per table 601. SHEETS A1.03 AND A1.04 12. All accessibility references are incorrect. The only governing accessibility code for this project is the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.2 2003 Edition). 13. Generic code copied details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessibility requirements including dimensions, details and accessories on the actual designed plans and elevations. SHEET A2.01 14. Please show the fence around the pool. SHEET A3.01 15. Note 2 refers to sheet A1.02 for typical interior elevation profiles and notes. It should read A1.03 and A1.04. a. Generic code copied details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessibility requirements as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) including dimensions, details and accessories on the actual designed plans and elevations. 16. Please change note 18 to read "ICC (ANSI 117.1 2003 Edition)". SHEET A3.02 17. DITTO comments 15 and 16. SHEET A3.03 18. DITTO comments 15 and 16. 19. In sure all vertical grab bars are shown as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 604.5.1. SHEET NOS. A3.04, A3.05, A3.06, A.07, A3.07a, A3.09, 20. DITTO comments 15 and 16. SHEET NOS. A3.03, A3.04a and A3.08 21. DITTO comments 18 and 19 SHEET A4.01 22. There is a stair and landing missing on the West side of Stair 2. SHEET A4.11 AND A4.12 23. DITTO comment 22. 24. Please provide pool and fence SHEET A4.11 25. Please show the pool and fence. The fence needs to be detailed showing compliance with the 2006 IBC, Section 3109. 26. DITTO comment 22 SHEET A6.11 27. Please show details of the stair and landing missing on the West side of stair 2. SHEET A8.01 28. Provide panic hardware as per 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.9 for all A3 areas SHEET 8.12 28. Please show the vertical grab bars in the accessible toilet stalls as per ICC (ANSI 117.1), Section 604.5.1. 29. Generic code copied details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessibility requirements as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition) including dimensions, details and accessories on the actual designed plans and elevations. 30. An accessible note refers to sheet A1.02 for typical interior elevation profiles and notes. It should read A1.03 and A1.04. a. Generic code copied details are not acceptable. Please provide all accessibility requirements as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC (ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition). SHEET A9.10 31. Revaluate the fire rating of the walls facing the East and West building as to Table 601. SHEET NUMBERS A4.16, A4.26a and A4.26b: 31A. Reference Note 3: The alternate methods of non-vented attic design are not applicable to commercial apartment projects. They were intended for residential use only. We apologize for any confusion caused as this reference was published on our web site. It is over 10 years old and is not longer relevant or applicable as changes in the code now address this situation. a. All attic venting for this project must comply with the requirements of the 2006 IBC, Section 1203. T11CMOO868/869/870 THE DISTRICT APARTMENTS STRUCTURAL REVIEW BY ERIC NEWCOMB 32. SHEET S0-2; DETAIL 12: DARKEN THE ROOF TRUSSES SO THEY WILL SHOW UP WHEN SCANNED. 33. SHEET S0-2; DETAIL 26: DARKEN THE ROOF TRUSS ON THE SIDE VIEW SO IT WILL SHOW UP WHEN SCANNED. 34. SHEET S0-3A (PLAN 2); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 37): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE U2 BEAM IS 2-2X12, WHILE THE DRAWING INDICATES THE BEAM (2210) IS 2-2X10. CLARIFY AND REVISE THAT BEAM REFERENCE ON ALL PLANS. 35. SHEET S0-3A; FRAMING PLAN 5: PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR BEAM 610 LOCATED IN THE CENTER INTERIOR WALL OF THIS PLAN. IT APPEARS TO BE NEARLY AS LONG AS THE BEAM 2210 (U2) AT THE INTERIOR WALL AND SIMILAR IN LOADING, YET THE BEAM 610 IS A 5 1/4" X 9 1/4" GLULAM, WHILE BEAM 2210 IS 2-2X10. CLARIFY. 36. SHEET S0-3B; FRAMING PLAN 1: PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE TWO BEAMS 616 (5 1/4" X 16" GLULAM) AT THE LOWER LEFT SIDE OF THE PLAN. 37. SHEET S0-3E; FRAMING PLAN 1: PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE THREE BEAMS 612 (5 1/4" X 11 7/8" GLULAM) AT THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR. 38. SHEET S0-3F; PLAN: THE SECTION CUT 24/S9-3 (IN THE UPPER LEFT PORTION OF THE BUILDING) IS INCORRECT (NO SECTION 24). REVISE. 39. SHEET S0-3F; PLAN: SINCE NO TRUSS OR JOIST SIZES ARE INDICATED ON THIS PLAN (ONLY A FLOOR FRAMING NOTE), GIVE SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO THE VARIOUS PLAN SHEETS FOR THE FRAMING SHOWN ON SHEET S0-3F. 40. SHEET S1-1B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 112-119): ARE THESE FOOTINGS LOCATED ON A CALCULATION KEY PLAN? PROVIDE. 41. SHEET S1-1B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ARE CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTINGS F3670, F4676, AND F50100 INCLUDED? PROVIDE. 42. SHEET S1-2B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ARE THESE FOOTINGS LOCATED ON A CALCULATION KEY PLAN? PROVIDE. 43. SHEET S1-2B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ARE CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTINGS F3670, F4676, AND F50100 INCLUDED? PROVIDE. 44. SHEET S1-3B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ARE THESE FOOTINGS LOCATED ON A CALCULATION KEY PLAN? PROVIDE. 45. SHEET S1-3B; STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: ARE CALCULATIONS FOR FOOTINGS F3670, F4676, AND F50100 INCLUDED? PROVIDE. 46. SHEET S2-0; PLANS: ALL OF THE UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATIONS HAVE THE REFERENCE S0-0. REVISE. 47. SHEET S2-1; PLAN: REVIEW AND REVISE ALL OF THE UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT ANY ARE CORRECT. 48. SHEET S2-2; PLAN: REVIEW AND REVISE ALL OF THE UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT ANY ARE CORRECT. 49. SHEET S2-3; PLAN: REVIEW AND REVISE ALL OF THE UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT ANY ARE CORRECT. 50. SHEET S3-0; PLANS: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 51. SHEET S3-1; PLANS: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 52. SHEET S3-2; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 53. SHEET S3-3; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 54. SHEET S4-0; PLANS: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 55. SHEET S4-1; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 56. SHEET S4-2; PLANS: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 57. SHEET S4-3; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 58. SHEET S5-0; PLANS: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 59. SHEET S5-1; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 60. SHEET S5-2; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 61. SHEET S5-3; PLAN: ADD ALL UNIT FRAMING PLAN DESIGNATION REFERENCES. 62. SHEET S7-1 (PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 86): THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE ANY SHEARWALL DESIGNATIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING I. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SHEARWALLS THAT ARE NOT TYPICAL OF THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS AND HAVE NO CALCULATIONS INCLUDED. INDICATE THESE DESIGNS ON THE KEY PLAN. 63. SHEET S7-2 (PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 87): THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN INDICATES TWO SHEARWALL DESIGNATIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING II. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SHEARWALLS THAT ARE NOT TYPICAL OF THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS AND HAVE NO CALCULATIONS INCLUDED. INDICATE THESE DESIGNS ON THE KEY PLAN. 64. SHEET S7-2 (SHEARWALL SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGES 104-108; SHEARWALL 10): THE SHEARWALL SCHEDULE INDICATES LARGER CAPACITY STRAPS AT THE SECOND AND THIRD FLOORS THAN THE CALCULATIONS, AND LARGER CAPACITY HOLDOWNS THAN THE CALCULATIONS. VERIFY. 65. SHEET S7-3 (PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 88): THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN INDICATES TWO SHEARWALL DESIGNATIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR BUILDING III. . PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SHEARWALLS THAT ARE NOT TYPICAL OF THE OTHER TWO BUILDINGS AND HAVE NO CALCULATIONS INCLUDED. INDICATE THESE DESIGNS ON THE KEY PLAN. 66. SHEET S8-1; SECTIONS 7, 8, 9, 10, AND 11: WHERE IS THE THICKENED SLAB POSITIONED IN RELATION TO THE WALL? PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ON THE SECTIONS. 67. SHEET S9-1; SECTION 6: THIS GLUE LAM BEAM IS CONNECTED TO THE COLUMN BELOW BY TOE-NAILING? NO COLUMN CAP CONNECTION? VERIFY. 68. SHEET S9-1; SECTION 6: HOW IS THE COLUMN ABOVE CONNECTED TO THE GLUE LAM BEAM? PROVIDE NOTE. 69. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGES 53-72: ARE THESE COLUMNS LOCATED ON A CALCULATION KEY PLAN? PROVIDE. 70. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; PAGES 22-24: BEAM FB5 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE CALCULATION KEY PLAN. PROVIDE. 71. GENERAL; ALL SHEETS: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE ALL LETTERING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" (UPPER AND LOWER CASE). REVISE. 72. GENERAL; SHEET S0-2: MAKE SURE INFORMATION ON THE FAR LEFT OF THE SHEET STAYS WITHIN THE BORDER SO IT CAN BE EASILY REVIEWED. 73. GENERAL: ALL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY RON BOOSE OR LEERAY HANLY BEFORE THOSE SUBMITTALS WILL BE REVIEWED. 74. GENERAL: IT APPEARS MANY DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND CALCULATION KEY PLAN REFERENCES ARE OMITTED FOR THIS REVIEW. PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION AS REQUIRED FOR FOOTINGS, COLUMNS, BEAMS, JOISTS, WALLS, AND SHEARWALLS. 75. GENERAL: THERE IS A RAMADA STRUCTURE INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS (REFERENCED AS PHASE V). THERE ARE NO STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS OR DRAWINGS FOR THIS STRUCTURE. CLARIFY. 76. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/06/2011 | LEERAY HANLY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 04/06/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 04/06/2011 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/29/2011 | SUE REEVES | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/29/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |