Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM00845
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/30/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. SHEET A0.00; PROJECT DATA: UNDER 'APPLICABLE CODES', REVISE THE BUILDING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL CODES FROM 'NONE' TO PERTINENT CODES. 2. SHEET A0.00; PROJECT DATA: UNDER 'APPLICABLE CODES', REVISE THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE TO ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003. 3. SHEET A0.1.2; WALL SCHEDULE (E8): THE DESCRIPTION LISTS THE GYPSUM BOARD AS 5/5". REVISE. 4. SHEET A0.1.2; WALL SCHEDULE (L4): FINISH THE DESCRIPTION. 5. SHEET A0.1.2; DOOR SCHEDULE (MATERIALS AND ACCEPTABLE PRODUCTS): REVISE THE LETTERING AND NUMBERING SYSTEM FOR CLARIFICATION. 6. SHEET A0.2.0; PLAN: MOVE THE DIMENSION BETWEEN GRIDS H AND J OUT OF THE BOXED NOTE. 7. SHEET A0.2.1; PLAN: IS KEY NOTE 308 NEAR GRIDS 4 AND J, GRIDS 4 AND D, AND GRIDS 9 AND J CORRECT? VERIFY. 8. SHEET A2.1.1; BUILDING SECTION: AT THE SKYLIGHTS (TWO LOCATIONS), FLIP THE TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS. 9. SHEET A3.1.0; SECTIONS 1 AND 2: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE METAL STUDS FOR NOTE 86. 10. SHEET A3.1.1; SECTIONS 1, 2, AND 3: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE METAL STUDS FOR NOTE 86. 11. SHEET A3.1.2; SECTIONS 2 AND 3: PROVIDE THE SPACING OF THE METAL STUDS FOR NOTE 86. 12. SHEET A4.0.0; DETAIL 7: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT ALL LETTERING BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. REVISE THE TABLE AND NOTES AS REQUIRED. 13. SHEET A4.0.0; DETAIL 9: A DETAIL 1/A4.0.2 IS REFERENCED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL. THIS DETAIL HAS BEEN OMITTED. CLARIFY. 14. SHEET A4.0.0; DETAIL 4: A DETAIL 11/A4.0.2 IS REFERENCED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE GLASS. THIS DETAIL HAS BEEN OMITTED. CLARIFY. 15. SHEET A4.0.0; DETAIL 4: A DETAIL 1/A4.0.2 IS REFERENCED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL. THIS DETAIL HAS BEEN OMITTED. CLARIFY. 16. SHEET A4.0.0; DETAIL 2: A DETAIL 1/A4.0.2 IS REFERENCED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL. THIS DETAIL HAS BEEN OMITTED. CLARIFY. 17. SHEET A4.0.1: THIS SHEET IS MISSING FROM THE REVIEW SET. THERE ARE REFERENCES ON SHEET A4.0.0 (DETAILS 2, 7, AND 9) FOR THAT SHEET. PROVIDE. 18. SHEET A4.0.2; DETAIL 4: REVISE THE NOTE 'PROVIDE DIAGONAL BRACE TO STRUCTURE ABOVE AS REQUIRED'. INCLUDE A REFERENCE TO A SPECIFIC DETAIL. 19. SHEET A4.0.3; DETAILS 2 AND 8: DARKEN THE DETAIL. 20. SHEET A4.8.1; DETAIL 2: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT ALL LETTERING BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 21. SHEET H-1; ELEVATION: PER THE ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, FIGURE 604.5.1, A VERTICAL GRAB BAR IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE. 22. SHEET H-1; ELEVATIONS: FINISH THE ELEVATIONS, INCLUDING THE DOOR SIGNAGE. 23. SHEET H-1; NOTES: REMOVE THE TABLE IN THE NOTES, OR PROVIDE INFORMATION IN THAT TABLE. 24. SHEET H-2; PUBLIC TELEPHONE TABLE NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT ALL LETTERING BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 25. SHEET H-2; HI/LOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT ALL LETTERING BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 26. SHEET H-2; FIRE LANE AND ENTRY SIGNS: THE CITY OF TUCSON STANDARDS REQUIRE THAT ALL LETTERING BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. 27. SHEET H-3; DETAIL 1: ADD THE VERTICAL GRAB BAR AT THE WATER CLOSET. 28. GENERAL: THERE ARE NOTES (208 AND 209 ON SHEET A0.1.1; AT THE ESCALATOR ON SHEETS A0.2.0 AND A0.2.1) THAT REFER TO STRUCTURAL. WHERE ARE THESE STRUCTURAL REFERENCES? VERIFY. 29. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 04/07/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a design for the mounting shelf for the water heater along with structural calculations to show that the water heater is safely supported. Reference: Sections 310.0 and 314.5, UPC 2006. 2. Show how the temperature of the hot water supply to the public lavatories is controlled. Reference: Section 413.1, UPC 2006 and Section 504.3, IECC 2006. 3. The temperature and pressure relief piping from a water heater shall not terminate into a water heater pan. (Note that a floor-level mop sink is an approved termination point for a T&P relief with an air gap.) Reference: Sections 508.5 and 608.5, UPC 2006. 4. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the valves, expansion tank, and vacuum relief. Reference: Sections 103.2.3, 605.5, 608.3, and 608.7 UPC 2006. 5. Based on a developed pipe length of 400 feet and Table 402.4 (2), IFGC 2006, the existing 4" gas main and the existing section of 3" gas pipe are undersized for the proposed gas loads. Reference: Section 402, IFGC 2006. |
| 04/08/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2011 | RAY MAJUTA | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | T11CM00845 4510 N Oracle TI Retail Electrical plans denied for following: 1.Provide 2006 IECC Budget Lighting Calculations for interior.Provide number of total fixtures to be used. 2.The equipment grounds for the secondary sides of the 112.5 kva transformers are sized incorrectly,they are required to be sized per 250.66 of the NEC rather than 250.122. 3. The equipment grounds on the secondary side of the 75 kva transformers are in the same situation as item #2 above. 4. Provide information on the fault current limiting protection that will be required on the MDS, for feeders. 5. Indicate on electrical plans that this job is to be installed under the requirements of The 2005 NEC,and City of Tucson Amendments. Ray Majuta, Elect Plan Review, PDSD, City of Tucson, 4/12/11 Ray.majuta@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/11/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Specify the minimum resistance (R-value) of the duct insulation to be used on this project. Reference: Section 503.2.7, IECC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Provide structural calculations to verify that the existing roof is capable of supporting the installation of the roof top units. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2006. 3. Provide calculations demonstrating adequate ventilation. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2011 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 05/03/2011 | SUE REEVES | REJECT SHELF | Completed |