Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T11CM00843
Parcel: 12709011E

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T11CM00843
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/22/2011 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approved
03/22/2011 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Clarify the termination of the exhaust fan - does it really stick out 30" outside of the building?
2. Exhaust ducts that are positively-pressurized shall not be located in a return air plenum.
3. Show that the 1300 cfm of exhaust can be compensated with sufficient makeup air to the space.
03/22/2011 RAY MAJUTA ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied T11CM00843

1. Water Heater on Mech Plan not in panel schedule.
2. Circuit P1A-27 on plan is part of a 3/pole circuit, and circuit 28 not on power plan.

R.T> Majuta
PDSD, City of Tucson,
Elect PLn Ck
3/22/11
520/837/4988
03/22/2011 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Approved
03/22/2011 RONALD BROWN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
03/22/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
03/22/2011 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Clarify the installation of the sink, P1. In riser diagram A it is shown with a conventional vent and a 2" waste line connecting to a main drain line but details 201 and 205 show two versions of air admittance valves being used. In the plumbing floor plan the 2" waste is connecting to the 2" waste riser for the existing sink - a wet vent?
03/22/2011 DAVE MANN FIRE REVIEW Approved
03/22/2011 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Passed
03/22/2011 BETH GRANT COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
04/04/2011 CAGUILA1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review