Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T11CM00819
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/29/2011 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/10/2011 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. GENERAL: INCLUDE A FULL SIZE SITE PLAN WITH THE SUBMITTAL DRAWINGS. 2. SHEET 1.1; WALL TYPE SCHEDULE: FOR THE THREE NEW METAL STUD WALL TYPES, PROVIDE THE STUD GAUGE. IS THE NOTE ON DETAIL B (ON THAT SHEET) TYPICAL GAUGE FOR ALL STUDS? VERIFY. 3. SHEET 1.1; KEYNOTES: KEYNOTE 2 COULD NOT BE LOCATED ON THE PLAN. VERIFY. 4. SHEET 1.1 (WALL TYPE SCHEDULE); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEETS 8 AND 10): THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET 1.1 INDICATES METAL STUD WALLS, WHILE THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS (SHEET 3.3) INDICATE WOOD STUDS. CLARIFY AND REVISE. 5. SHEET 3.0; STANDARD STRUCTURAL NOTES: UNDER THE "GENERAL" HEADING, NOTE 2E INDICATES A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WAS USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT. PROVIDE THAT REPORT FOR REVIEW BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. 6. SHEET 3.1 (FOUNDATION PLAN); FOUNDATION KEYNOTES: NOTE 2 INDICATES A 4X6 WOOD POST, WHILE NOTE 3 (TYPICAL AT WOOD POSTS) INDICATES THE HOLDOWN ANCHOR ON A DOUBLE STUD. CLARIFY. 7. SHEET 3.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); ROOF KEYNOTES: NOTE 4 INDICATES T.O.B. AND T.O.L. ELEVATIONS. ARE THOSE PERTINENT TO THESE PLANS? CLARIFY AND PROVIDE ELEVATIONS IF REQUIRED. 8. SHEET 3.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: AT THE SOUTH WALL OF THE ADDITION, A SECTION 17/3.3 IS CUT. THERE IS NO DETAIL 17 ON 3.3. CLARIFY. 9. GENERAL: PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 05/16/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/16/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Joints in copper tubing installed under a concrete floor slab within a building shall be brazed, with wrought copper fittings. Reference: Section 609.3.2, UPC 2006. 2. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans for the addition. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Show the dimensions of the scuppers, downspouts, and other drainage components. Reference: Section 1101.11, UPC 2006. |
| 05/16/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope (Pima County < 4,000 feet). Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections 101.4 and 104.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2006. 2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the mechanical equipment and provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Section 503.2, IECC 2006. 3. Provide balancing data for the new supply diffusers located over the pharmacy counter. Reference: Section 403.3.4, IMC 2006. |
| 05/23/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/24/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2011 | DELMA ROBEY | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |